throbber
Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 117 Filed 07/12/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 4488
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00337-JRG
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT DEPOSITION OF
`DR. TRAIL AFTER CLOSE OF CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY
`
`Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited respectfully moves for leave to conduct a
`
`deposition after close of claim-construction discovery of Plaintiff’s expert regarding claim
`
`construction, Dr. Pamela Trail. The Court recently granted an unopposed motion extending the
`
`close of claim-construction discovery from July 2, 2021, to July 12, 2021. Defendant is now
`
`requesting, and Plaintiff has now agreed to, an extension to Tuesday, July 27, 2021, to take the
`
`deposition of Dr. Pamela Trail. Good cause exists here, as the parties and witness were unable to
`
`complete this deposition earlier due to scheduling issues and require additional time for Plaintiff
`
`to plan for travel to the deposition, which Defendant intends to conduct in person. The requested
`
`extension will not affect any other deadlines in this matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 117 Filed 07/12/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4489
`
`
`
`Dated: July 12, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ G. Blake Thompson______________
`G. Blake Thompson
`State Bar No. 24042033
`blake@themannfirm.com
`J. Mark Mann
`State Bar No. 12926150
`mark@themannfirm.com
`MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON
`201 E. Howard St.
`Henderson, Texas 75654
`(903) 657-8540
`(903) 657-6003 (fax)
`
`
`Deron R. Dacus
`State Bar No. 00790553
`The Dacus Firm, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas, 75701
`+1 (903) 705-1117
`+1 (903) 581-2543 facsimile
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi
`Sankyo Company, Limited
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Preston K. Ratliff II
`Joseph M. O’Malley, Jr.
`Ashley N. Mays-Williams
`Paul Hastings LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`(212) 318-6000
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi
`Sankyo Company, Limited
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 117 Filed 07/12/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4490
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service are being served this 12th day of July, 2021, with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ G. Blake Thompson______________
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`The undersigned certifies that Defendant’s counsel has conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel
`
`pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h) and that the foregoing motion is unopposed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Deron R. Dacus______________
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket