`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. 2:20-cv-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SEAGEN, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff
`v.
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
` Defendant,
`
`ASTRAZENECA
`PHARMACEUTICALS LP and
`ASTRAZENECA UK LTD,
`
` Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`
`MINUTES FOR MARKMAN HEARING
`HELD BEFORE U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE RODNEY GILSTRAP
`August 27, 2021
`
`
`OPEN: 09:02 AM
`
`
`
`
`
`ADJOURN: 12:07 PM
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF:
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT:
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENORS:
`
`TECHNICAL ADVISOR:
`
`LAW CLERK:
`
`
`
`
`COURT REPORTER:
`
`COURTROOM DEPUTY:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`See attached
`
`See attached.
`
`See attached.
`
`Shane Nelson
`
`Jim Lomeo
`Lee Matalon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Shawn McRoberts, RMR, CRR
`
`Andrea Brunson, CP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TIME
`09:02 AM Court opened.
`09:03 AM Counsel announced ready for hearing.
`
`MINUTES
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 149 Filed 08/27/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 7593
`
`TIME
`09:05 AM
`
`MINUTES
`The Court began hearing claim construction argument on a claim by claim basis.
`Presented argument on behalf of Plaintiff: Mr. Matthew Chivvis.
`Presented argument on behalf of Defendant: Mr. Preston Ratliff.
`Presented argument on behalf of Intervenors: Mr. David Berl.
`10:26 AM Recess.
`10:38 AM Court reconvened.
`10:39 AM Court continued hearing claim construction argument.
`12:07 PM Arguments concluded.
`12:07 PM
`Court took claim construction under submission.
`12:07 PM
`Court adjourned.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
