throbber
Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 225 Filed 11/11/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 8499
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`Defendant, and
`
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
`LP and ASTRAZENECA UK LTD.,
`
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW SEAGEN’S RENEWED MOTION TO
`COMPEL DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.’S PRODUCTION OF DEVELOPMENT
`DOCUMENTS AND FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 37 [DKT. 187]
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 225 Filed 11/11/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 8500
`
`Plaintiff Seagen Inc. (“Seagen”) and Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd. (“Daiichi Sankyo
`
`Japan”) have reached an agreement to resolve the dispute raised in Seagen’s Renewed Motion to
`
`Compel Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.’s Production of Development Documents and for Relief Under
`
`Rule 37 (Dkt. No. 187) (“Motion”) as follows:
`
`DSC represents that it has searched the files of Drs. Masuda, Morita, Miyazaki, and
`
`Kasuya, and produced all responsive documents to Seagen’s revised requests, including to the
`
`extent any such documents exist: (1) documents that show how DSC developed its protocols for
`
`conjugating the DS-8201 linker to cysteine amino acids and (2) how it selected the components in
`
`the DS-8201 linker from December 2009 until January 2012.
`
`Based on this representation, Seagen has agreed to withdraw the Motion and respectfully
`
`requests leave of Court to do so.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 11, 2021
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`By: Melissa R. Smith
`Michael A. Jacobs
`MJacobs@mofo.com
`Matthew A. Chivvis
`MChivvis@mofo.com
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`425 Market Street
`San Francisco, California 94105
`Telephone: 415.268.7000
`Facsimile: 415.268.7522
`
`Bryan Wilson
`BWilson@mofo.com
`Pieter S. de Ganon
`PdeGanon@mofo.com
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`755 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1018
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 225 Filed 11/11/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 8501
`
`Telephone: 650.813.5600
`Facsimile: 650.494.0792
`
`Melissa R. Smith
`Texas State Bar No. 24001351
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: 903.934.8450
`Facsimile: 903.934.9257
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`T. John Ward, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 00794818
`jw@wsfirm.com
`Charles Everingham IV
`Texas State Bar No. 00787447
`ce@wsfirm.com
`Andrea L. Fair
`Texas State Bar No. 24078488
`andrea@wsfirm.com
`WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC
`1507 Bill Owens Parkway
`Longview, Texas 75604
`Telephone: 903.757.6400
`Facsimile: 903.757.2323
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Seagen Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 225 Filed 11/11/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 8502
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 11th day of November, 2021.
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`I hereby certify that the Parties have met and conferred regarding this Motion on November
`
`10, 2021. This motion is unopposed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket