`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
` §
` §
` §
` §
` §
`
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.’s (“DSC”) Unopposed Motion to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
`LP, and ASTRAZENECA UK LTD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`
`
`Withdraw Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Japan’s Motion to Compel Seagen Inc.’s Discovery
`
`Production (Dkt. No. 221); Plaintiff Seagen Inc. (“Seagen”), DSC, and Defendant-Intervenors
`
`AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca UK Ltd.’s (collectively, “AstraZeneca”)
`
`Unopposed Motion to Withdraw and Partially Withdraw Motions to Compel Regarding
`
`Depositions [Dkt.188 and 213] (Dkt. No. 223); Seagen, DSC, and AstraZeneca’s Unopposed
`
`Motion to Withdraw Motions to Compel Regarding Privilege Issues [Dkt. 201, 202, 211] (Dkt.
`
`No. 224); and Seagen, DSC, and AstraZeneca’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Seagen’s
`
`Renewed Motion to Compel Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.’s Production of Development Documents
`
`and for Relief under Rule 37 [Dkt. 187] (Dkt. No. 225) (collectively, the “Motions to Withdraw”).
`
`Having considered the Motions to Withdraw, and noting their joint and unopposed nature, the
`
`Court is of the opinion that they should be and hereby are GRANTED.
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 227 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 8509
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that DSC’s Motion to Compel Seagen Inc.’s Discovery
`
`Production (Dkt. No. 179), Seagen’s Renewed Motion to Compel Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.’s
`
`Production of Development Documents and for Relief under Rule 37 (Dkt. No. 187), Seagen’s
`
`Motion to Compel Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd to Produce Alleged Common Interest Agreement and
`
`Withheld Documents (Dkt. No. 201), Seagen’s Motion to Compel AstraZenca To Produce
`
`Responsive Communications with DSC and Other Documents over Which Privilege Claims Have
`
`Been Waived (Dkt. No. 202), AstraZeneca’s Motion to Compel Seagen to Produce Documents
`
`and Testimony over Which Privilege Has Been Waived (Dkt. No. 211), and AstraZeneca’s Motion
`
`to Compel Seagen to Produce Dr. Peter Senter’s Arbitration Testimony and Related Materials
`
`(Dkt. No. 213) are WITHDRAWN. Further, Seagen’s Motion to Compel Depositions of
`
`Toshinori Agatsuma, Yuki Abe, Yuji Kasuya, and Koji Morita (Dkt. No. 188) is PARTIALLY
`
`WITHDRAWN with respect to Toshinori Agatsuma, Yuki Abe, and Yuji Kasuya. The Court will
`
`issue a separate order resolving the remaining motions to compel as announced during the
`
`November 10, 2021 motions hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`So Ordered this
`Nov 12, 2021
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
