throbber
Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 230 Filed 11/16/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 8551
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`









` §
` §
` §
` §
` §
`
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd.’s (“DSC”) Motion to Compel the
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
`LP, and ASTRAZENECA UK LTD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Deposition of Clay Siegall, Ph.D (Dkt. No. 178), Seagen Inc.’s (“Seagen”) Motion to Compel the
`
`Deposition of Sunao Manabe (Dkt. No. 186), and Seagen’s Motion to Compel Depositions of
`
`Toshinori Agatsuma, Yuki Abe, Yuji Kasuya, and Koji Morita (Dkt. No. 188).1 On November
`
`10, 2021, the Court held oral argument on the aforementioned motions. This Order sets forth the
`
`Court’s rulings announced on the record during said argument.
`
`As set forth on the record, DSC’s Motion to Compel the Deposition of Clay Siegall, Ph.D
`
`(Dkt. No. 178) is DENIED-IN-PART and GRANTED-IN-PART. (Dkt. No. 228 at 15:20–16:5).
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that DSC may depose Dr. Siegall by written deposition of no more
`
`than four questions regarding the reason the collaboration between DSC and Seagen failed.
`
`
`1 Dkt. No. 188 was withdrawn for all named individuals except Dr. Koji Morita. (Dkt. Nos. 223, 227)
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 230 Filed 11/16/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 8552
`
`As set forth on the record, Seagen’s Motion to Compel the Deposition of Sunao Manabe
`
`(Dkt. No. 186) is DENIED. (Dkt. No. 228 at 15:17–19).
`
`As set forth on the record, the remaining dispute on Seagen’s Motion to Compel
`
`Depositions of Toshinori Agatsuma, Yuki Abe, Yuji Kasuya, and Koji Morita (Dkt. No. 188) is
`
`GRANTED-AS-MODIFED. (Dkt. No. 228 at 33:11–23). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that
`
`Dr. Morita is to be deposited virtually (i.e., via remote deposition) in Japanese with the ability of
`
`a translator to assist the witness either in the United States or another country of his choosing
`
`where his deposition is permissible. Said deposition shall occur within twenty-one (21) days from
`
`the date of the oral argument and last no more than eight (8) hours, including translation time.
`
`Also before the Court is Seagen’s Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record with
`
`Deposition of Dr. Naito in Support of Motions to Compel (the “Motion to Supplement”). (Dkt.
`
`No. 222). Having resolved the underlying motions to compel, Seagen’s Motion to Supplement is
`
`hereby DENIED-AS-MOOT.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16th day of November, 2021.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket