`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendant,
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP,
`AND ASTRAZENECA UK LTD.,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00337-JRG
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED’S
`UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION FROM THE MOTION HEARING TRANSCRIPT
`
`Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited (“Daiichi Sankyo Japan”) respectfully submits
`
`this Unopposed Motion to Redact Confidential Information from the Motion Hearing Transcript.
`
`Daiichi Sankyo Japan respectfully requests specific limited portions of the transcript from the
`
`November 10, 2021 motion hearing be redacted and moves to seal those portions of the transcript.
`
`These portions of the transcript discuss non-public, highly confidential information that would
`
`potentially harm the Parties if such highly confidential information were made public. The specific
`
`portions of the transcript for which redactions are requested are as follows:
`
`Page 11, lines 4-7, 8-10, 16-18, 22-24;
`
`Page 12, lines 9-10;
`
`Page 13, lines 22-24;
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 236 Filed 12/07/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 8595
`
`Page 14, lines 19-22;
`
`Page 17, lines 24-25;
`
`Page 18, lines 1-2, 4-10, 12-14, 23-25;
`
`Page 19, lines 1, 5-15, 18-19, 22-24;
`
`Page 20, lines 13-16;
`
`Page 21, lines 11-12;
`
`Page 24, lines 1-5, 7-8, 12-14, 22-24, 25;
`
`Page 25, line 1;
`
`Page 26, lines 13-22;
`
`Page 27, lines 13-15, 23-24;
`
`Page 28, lines 19-20;
`
`Page 29, lines 7-8, 12-14, 15-16, 22-23;
`
`Page 31, lines 8-18, 20-25; and
`
`Page 32, lines 1-3, 6-11.
`
`Daiichi Sankyo Japan respectfully requests the Court redact these portions of the public
`
`transcript.
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 236 Filed 12/07/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 8596
`
`Dated: December 7, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ G. Blake Thompson
`
`Deron R. Dacus
`State Bar No. 00790553
`The Dacus Firm, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas, 75701
`+1 (903) 705-1117
`+1 (903) 581-2543 facsimile
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`J. Mark Mann
`State Bar No. 12926150
`mark@themannfirm.com
`G. Blake Thompson
`State Bar No. 24042033
`blake@themannfirm.com
`MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON
`201 E. Howard St.
`Henderson, Texas 75654
`(903) 657-8540
`(903) 657-6003 (fax)
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi
`Sankyo Company, Limited
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Preston K. Ratliff II
`Joseph M. O’Malley, Jr.
`Ashley N. Mays-Williams
`Paul Hastings LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`(212) 318-6000
`
`Jeffrey A. Pade
`Paul Hastings LLP
`2050 M Street NW Washington,
`DC 20036
`(202) 551-1700
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi
`Sankyo Company, Limited
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 236 Filed 12/07/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 8597
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who have consented to
`
`electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via electronic mail on December
`
`7, 2021.
`
`/s/ Preston K. Ratliff II
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`I hereby certify that the Parties have met and conferred regarding this motion via email on
`
`December 6, 2021. This motion is unopposed.
`
`/s/ Preston K. Ratliff II
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
