`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
` §
` §
` §
` §
` §
`
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is Seagen Inc.’s (“Seagen”) Renewed Motion to Compel Daiichi Sankyo
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
`LP, and ASTRAZENECA UK LTD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`
`
`Co., Ltd.’s Production and Development Documents and for Relief Under Rule 37 (the “Motion”).
`
`(Dkt. No. 234). On December 20, 2021, the Court held a telephonic hearing on the Motion. This
`
`Order sets forth the Court’s rulings announced on the record during said hearing.1
`
`As set forth on the record, Mr. Morita will undergo a second deposition in Japanese. Such
`
`deposition shall not exceed six (6) hours. (Hearing Tr. at 13:13–20). The parties also agreed to
`
`undertake limited supplemental reports of their technical experts to address the newly produced
`
`lab notebooks and Mr. Morita’s first deposition. Such supplemental reports shall not exceed five
`
`(5) pages. The supplemental reports must be exchanged with enough time to file any challenges
`
`before the January 6, 2022 deadline to file Daubert motions. Subject to these limitations, the Court
`
`left the logistics and timing of the exchange to the parties. (Hearing Tr. at 16:23–17:15). In light
`
`
`1 As of the filing of this Order, the transcript for the December 20,2021 telephonic hearing had not been uploaded to
`the docket. Accordingly, citations to the transcript are notated by “Hearing Tr.”
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 251 Filed 01/04/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 8727
`
`of these agreements, Seagen’s Motion was DENIED-AS-MOOT as to the discovery relief sought
`
`in the Motion. However, the Court noted that it was not resolving Seagen’s request for sanctions,
`
`and accordingly that aspect of Seagen’s Motion was CARRIED. (Hearing Tr. at 19:13–19, 19:22–
`
`20:3, 21:9–15).
`
`Also before the Court was Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd.’s (“DSC”) Unopposed Motion
`
`to Redact Confidential Information from the Motion Hearing Transcript (the “Motion to Redact”).
`
`(Dkt. No. 236). After discussion on the Motion to Redact, counsel for DSC withdrew the Motion
`
`to Redact. (Hearing Tr. at 24:1–17). DSC also filed an Unopposed Motion to Withdraw the
`
`Motion to Redact. (Dkt. No. 250). Accordingly, the Motion to Withdraw the Motion to Redact is
`
`GRANTED and the Motion to Redact is WITHDRAWN.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 4th day of January, 2022.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
