`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendant,
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
`LP, and ASTRAZENECA UK LTD
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG
`
`ORDER
`
`The Court issues this Order sua sponte. On January 28, 2022, Defendant Daiichi Sankyo
`
`Co., Ltd. (“DSC”) filed its Response in Opposition to Seagen, Inc.’s (“Seagen”) Motion for Leave
`
`to use Certain Documents in Co-Pending Arbitration (“DSC’s Opposition”). (Dkt. No. 278).
`
`DSC’s Opposition raises serious allegations regarding an alleged violation of the Court’s
`
`Discovery Order and Protective Order. (E.g., id. at 1, 5–7) (“In sum, Seagen repeatedly violated
`
`the Court’s Discovery Order and Protective Order by quoting, displaying, providing, summarizing,
`
`describing, and referencing the contents of the Texas Discovery Material.”). The Court takes
`
`these allegations seriously, and the Court will not hesitate to issue sanctions if it finds its orders
`
`have been ignored.1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that if DSC believes Seagen has
`
`engaged in sanctionable conduct regarding the Court’s Discovery Order and Protective Order,
`
`it shall move for sanctions no later than February 10, 2022. Said motion shall
`
`1 See CEATS, Inc. v. TicketNetwork, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01470, 2021 WL 3738847 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2021).
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 286 Filed 02/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 10728
`
`unambiguously describe the allegedly sanctionable conduct and circumstances related thereto,
`
`supported by accompanying exhibits (if applicable), and not exceed ten (10) pages in length.
`
`Should DSC file such motion, Seagen may file a response in opposition no later than
`
`February 17, 2022. Seagen’s response shall not exceed ten (10) pages in length. No reply or
`
`sur-reply shall be filed without advanced leave from the Court. Should, however, despite the
`
`language employed by DSC in its Opposition, an affirmative motion for sanctions not be
`
`filed by DSC on or before February 10, 2022, then the Court will consider such allegations to
`
`be unfounded and proceed to consider Seagen’s Motion without the cloud imposed by DSC’s
`
`strong words.2
`
`2 Said another way, DSC needs to fish or cut bait.
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 2nd day of February, 2022.
`
`