Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 310 Filed 02/12/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 10948
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendant,
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, and
`ASTRAZENECA UK LTD,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`SECOND AMENDED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`It is hereby ORDERED that the following schedule of deadlines is in effect until further
`
`order of this Court:
`
`DATE
`
`NEW DATE
`
`EVENT
`
`April 4, 2022
`
`March 7, 2022
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall,
`Texas
`
`* If a juror questionnaire is to be used, an
`editable
`(in Microsoft Word
`format)
`questionnaire shall be jointly submitted to
`the Deputy Clerk in Charge by this date.1
`
`1 The Parties are referred to the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Use of Juror Questionnaires in
`Advance of Voir Dire.
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 310 Filed 02/12/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 10949
`
`DATE
`
`NEW DATE
`
`EVENT
`
`February 28, 2022
`
`February 24, 2022
`
`February 22, 2022
`
`February 21, 2022
`
`February 22, 2022
`
`February 21, 2022
`
`February 14, 2022
`
`in
`*Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m.
`Marshall, Texas before Judge Rodney
`Gilstrap
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached
`During Meet and Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer
`on any outstanding objections or motions in
`limine. The parties shall advise the Court of
`any agreements reached no later than 1:00
`p.m. three (3) business days before the
`pretrial conference.
`
`*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed
`Jury Instructions, Joint Proposed Verdict
`Form, Responses to Motions in Limine,
`Updated Exhibit Lists, Updated Witness
`Lists, and Updated Deposition Designations
`
`for Daily
`*File Notice of Request
`Transcript or Real Time Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of
`court proceedings is requested for trial, the
`party or parties making said request shall
`file a notice with the Court and e-mail the
`Court Reporter, Shawn McRoberts, at
`shawn_mcroberts@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`February 14, 2022
`
`File Motions in Limine
`
`February 14, 2022
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in
`limine
`to
`issues
`that
`if
`improperly
`introduced at trial would be so prejudicial
`that the Court could not alleviate the
`prejudice by giving appropriate instructions
`to the jury.
`
`Serve Objections
`Disclosures
`
`to Rebuttal Pretrial
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 310 Filed 02/12/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 10950
`
`(*) indicates a deadline that cannot be changed without showing good cause. Good cause is
`not shown merely by indicating that the parties agree that the deadline should be changed.
`
`ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`
`Mediation: While certain cases may benefit from mediation, such may not be appropriate
`for every case. The Court finds that the parties are best suited to evaluate whether mediation will
`benefit the case after the issuance of the Court’s claim construction order. Accordingly, the Court
`ORDERS the parties to file a Joint Notice indicating whether the case should be referred for
`mediation within fourteen days of the issuance of the Court’s claim construction order. As a
`part of such Joint Notice, the parties should indicate whether they have a mutually agreeable
`mediator for the Court to consider. If the parties disagree about whether mediation is appropriate,
`the parties should set forth a brief statement of their competing positions in the Joint Notice.
`
`Summary Judgment Motions, Motions to Strike Expert Testimony, and Daubert
`Motions: For each motion, the moving party shall provide the Court with two (2) hard copies of
`the completed briefing (opening motion, response, reply, and if applicable, sur-reply), excluding
`exhibits, in D-three-ring binders, appropriately tabbed. All documents shall be single-sided and
`must include the CM/ECF header. These copies shall be delivered to the Court within three (3)
`business days after briefing has completed. For expert-related motions, complete digital copies of
`the relevant expert report(s) and accompanying exhibits shall be submitted on a single flash drive
`to the Court. Complete digital copies of the expert report(s) shall be delivered to the Court no later
`than the dispositive motion deadline.
`
`Indefiniteness: In lieu of early motions for summary judgment, the parties are directed to
`include any arguments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their Markman briefing, subject to
`the local rules’ normal page limits.
`
`Lead Counsel: The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-11(a)(1), which provides that
`“[o]n the first appearance through counsel, each party shall designate a lead attorney on the
`pleadings or otherwise.” Additionally, once designated, a party’s lead attorney may only be
`changed by the filing of a Motion to Change Lead Counsel and thereafter obtaining from the Court
`an Order granting leave to designate different lead counsel.
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 310 Filed 02/12/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 10951
`
`Motions for Continuance: The following excuses will not warrant a continuance nor
`justify a failure to comply with the discovery deadline:
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;
`
`The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day,
`unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special
`provision for the parties in the other case;
`
`The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it
`was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.
`
`Amendments to the Docket Control Order (“DCO”): Any motion to alter any date on
`the DCO shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion to amend the DCO shall
`include a proposed order that lists all of the remaining dates in one column (as above) and the
`proposed changes to each date in an additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a date
`the proposed date column should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). In other words,
`the DCO in the proposed order should be complete such that one can clearly see all the remaining
`deadlines and the changes, if any, to those deadlines, rather than needing to also refer to an earlier
`version of the DCO.
`
`Proposed DCO: The parties’ Proposed DCO should also follow the format described
`above under “Amendments to the Docket Control Order (‘DCO’).”
`
`Joint Pretrial Order: In the contentions of the parties included in the Joint Pretrial Order,
`the Plaintiff shall specify all allegedly infringed claims that will be asserted at trial. The Plaintiff
`shall also specify the nature of each theory of infringement, including under which subsections of
`35 U.S.C. § 271 it alleges infringement, and whether the Plaintiff alleges divided infringement or
`infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. Each Defendant shall indicate the nature of each
`theory of invalidity, including invalidity for anticipation, obviousness, subject-matter eligibility,
`written description, enablement, or any other basis for invalidity. The Defendant shall also specify
`each prior art reference or combination of references upon which the Defendant shall rely at trial,
`with respect to each theory of invalidity. The contentions of the parties may not be amended,
`supplemented, or dropped without leave of the Court based upon a showing of good cause.
`
`.
`
`So Ordered this
`Feb 12, 2022
`
`