`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`Defendant, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00337-JRG
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
`LP and ASTRAZENECA UK LTD.,
`
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED
`BRIEFING ON ITS MOTION TO STAY PENDING POST-GRANT REVIEW
`
`In accordance with Local Rule CV-7(e), Defendants Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited,
`
`AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, and AstraZeneca UK Ltd. (collectively, “Defendants”) move
`
`for expedited briefing on its Motion to Stay Pending Post-Grant Review (Dkt. No. 392). To
`
`facilitate the Court’s simultaneous review of the Parties’ respective outstanding motions (see also
`
`Dkt. No. 390), Defendants respectfully request that the Court order Plaintiff Seagen Inc.
`
`(“Seagen”) to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Post-Grant Review (Dkt. No. 392)
`
`on or before May 4, 2022. Seagen does not oppose this motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 394 Filed 04/27/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 15453
`
`
`Dated: April 27, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
` /s/ Preston K. Ratliff II
`Deron R. Dacus
`Texas State Bar No. 00790553
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`THE DACUS FIRM, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas 75701
`Telephone: 903.705.1117
`Facsimile: 903.581.2543
`
`J. Mark Mann
`Texas State Bar No. 12926150
`mark@themannfirm.com
`G. Blake Thompson
`Texas State Bar No. 240420033
`blake@themannfirm.com
`MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON
`201 E. Howard Street
`Henderson, Texas
`Telephone: 903.357.8540
`Facsimile: 903.657.6003
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi Sankyo
`Company, Limited
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Preston K. Ratliff II
`Ashley N. Mays-Williams
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10166
`Telephone: 212.318.6000
`
`Jeffrey A. Pade
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`2050 M Street NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`Telephone: 202.551.1700
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi Sankyo
`Company, Limited
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 394 Filed 04/27/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 15454
`
`
`
`/s/ Thomas S. Fletcher
`Jennifer Parker Ainsworth
`Texas State Bar No. 00784720
`WILSON, ROBERTSON
`& CORNELIUS, P.C.
`909 ESE Loop 323, Suite 400
`Tyler, Texas 75701
`Phone: (903) 509-5000
`Facsimile: (903) 509-5092
`
`Attorney for Intervenor-Defendants
`AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and
`AstraZeneca UK Ltd.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`David I. Berl
`Thomas S. Fletcher
`Jessamyn Berniker
`Jessica L. Pahl
`Kathryn Kayali
`Kevin Hoagland-Hanson
`Angela X. Gao
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: (202) 434-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
`
`Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendants
`AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and
`AstraZeneca UK Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 394 Filed 04/27/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 15455
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in
`
`compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who are
`
`deemed to have consented to electronic service on this the 27 day of April, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Preston K. Ratliff II
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`I hereby certify that the Parties have met and conferred via email regarding this Motion on
`
`April 27, 2022. This Motion is unopposed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Preston K. Ratliff II
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
