`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`Defendant, and
`
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
`LP and ASTRAZENECA UK LTD.,
`
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO SEAGEN’S NOTICE OF RIPENESS
`ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF POST-TRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE
`
`Plaintiff Seagen Inc. (“Seagen”) filed a notice with the Court on May 4, 2022 stating that
`
`“Seagen’s Motion for Entry of Post-Trial Briefing Schedule (Dkt. No. 390) is ripe for decision.”
`
`Dkt. 397. Seagen’s position that its motion for entry is ripe for decision is inconsistent with the
`
`Court’s order of April 28, 2022, which granted Defendants Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited,
`
`AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, and AstraZeneca UK Ltd.’s (collectively, “Defendants”)
`
`Motion for Expedited Briefing on its Motion to Stay Pending Post-Grant Review in order to
`
`“facilitate the Court’s simultaneous review of the parties’ outstanding motions.” Dkt. 395.
`
`Defendants will be filing a reply in support of its motion to stay on Wednesday, May 11, 2022,
`
`after which time, barring any further sur-reply from Seagen, both motions will be ready for the
`
`Court’s simultaneous review.
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 400 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 15544
`
`Dated: May 9, 2022
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /s/ Preston K. Ratliff II
`
`Deron R. Dacus
`State Bar No. 00790553
`The Dacus Firm, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas, 75701
`+1 (903) 705-1117
`+1 (903) 581-2543 facsimile
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`J. Mark Mann
`State Bar No. 12926150
`mark@themannfirm.com
`MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, Texas 75652
`(903) 657-8540
`(903) 657-6003 (fax)
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Company,
`Limited
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Preston K. Ratliff II
`Ashley N. Mays-Williams
`Paul Hastings LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`(212) 318-6000
`
`Jeffrey A. Pade
`Paul Hastings LLP
`2050 M Street NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`(202) 551-1700
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Company,
`Limited
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 400 Filed 05/09/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 15545
`
` /s/ David Berl
`
`Jennifer Parker Ainsworth
`Texas State Bar No. 00784720
`WILSON, ROBERTSON & CORNELIUS, P.C.
`909 ESE Loop 323, Suite 400
`Tyler, Texas 75701
`Phone: (903) 509-5000
`Facsimile: (903) 509-5092
`
`Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendants AstraZeneca
`Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca UK Ltd
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`David I. Berl
`Thomas S. Fletcher
`Jessamyn Berniker
`Jessica L. Pahl
`Kathryn Kayali
`Kevin Hoagland-Hanson
`Angela X. Gao
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: (202) 434-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
`
`Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendants AstraZeneca
`Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca UK Ltd
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 400 Filed 05/09/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 15546
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who have consented to
`
`electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via electronic mail on May 9,
`
`2022.
`
`/s/ Preston K. Ratliff II
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
