`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiff Seagen Inc.’s (“Seagen”) Unopposed Motion for Extension of
`
`Time to Respond to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. 24) and Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.
`
`22) (the “Motion for Extension”). (Dkt. No. 44). In the Motion for Extension, Seagen requests a
`
`seven (7) day extension of its deadline to respond to Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.’s
`
`(“DSCL”) Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Lack of
`
`Personal Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 22) and Motion to Transfer Under 28
`
`U.S.C. § 1404 to the District of Delaware (the “Motion to Transfer”) (Dkt. No. 24). DSCL is
`
`unopposed. The Court previously granted a fourteen (14) day extension of the same deadline. After
`
`due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion for Extension should be and hereby
`
`is GRANTED.
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Seagen’s deadline to respond to the Motion to Dismiss
`
`and the Motion to Transfer is extended up to and including February 10, 2021. Absent
`
`extraordinary circumstances, the parties should not expect a further extension of this deadline.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 43 Filed 01/31/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 287
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`So Ordered this
`Jan 31, 2021
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
