`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
` §
` §
` §
` §
` §
`
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is the Motion to Expedite Consideration of Defendants’ Opposed Motion
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
`LP, and ASTRAZENECA UK LTD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`Under Entry of Judgment Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 52(b) and 59(e) to Amend or Add
`
`Findings of Fact and Alter or Amend the Judgment (ECF No. 499) (the “Motion to Expedite”)
`
`filed by Plaintiff Seagen Inc. (“Seagen”). (Dkt. No. 506). In the Motion to Expedite, Seagen
`
`requests that the Court expedite its consideration of Defendants’ Opposed Motion Under Federal
`
`Rules of Civil Procedure 52(b) and 59(e) to Amend or Add Findings of Fact and Alter or Amend
`
`the Judgment (Dkt. No. 499) (the “Motion to Amend”). (Dkt. No. 506 at 2). Seagen contends that
`
`the apparent purpose of the Motion to Amend is “simply to delay the final disposition of this case
`
`at the district court level and effectively disrupt the appellate process.” (Id.). Seagen filed the
`
`Motion to Expedite as opposed. (Id. at 4).
`
`Having considered the Motion to Expedite, and noting the lack of compelling reasons
`
`contained therein that would necessitate the Court’s expeditious review, the Court finds that the
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 507 Filed 10/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21633
`
`Motion to Expedite should be and hereby is DENIED. The Court will address the Motion to
`
`Amend in due course and consistent with the Court’s other obligations.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 2nd day of October, 2023.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
