`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiff Seagen Inc.’s (“Seagen”) Motion to Withdraw Motion to
`
`Compel Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.’s Discovery Responses and Production (the “Motion to
`
`Withdraw”). (Dkt. No. 92). In the same, Seagen informs the Court that Defendant Daiichi Sankyo
`
`Co., Ltd. (“DSCL”) has agreed to produce certain documents and moves to withdraw its Motion
`
`to Compel Daiichi Sankyo Co., Limited’s Discovery Responses and Production (the “Motion to
`
`Compel”) (Dkt. No. 79). Having considered the Motion to Withdraw, and noting that it is
`
`unopposed, the Court is of the opinion that the same should be and hereby is GRANTED.
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Seagen’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 79) is
`
`WITHDRAWN.
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of May, 2021.
`
`