throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00089-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
`
`
`
`
`
`DANNY NORRIS COLEMAN
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`VS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TYSON FOODS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`


`§ CASE NO.


`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
`
`NOW COMES DANNY NORRIS COLEMAN, Plaintiff, complaining of TYSON FOODS,
`
`INC., Defendant, and for cause of action would show the Court the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff is a resident of Shreveport, Caddo Parrish, Louisiana.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant, TYSON FOODS, INC., is an Arkansas Corporation licensed to do business
`
`in Texas with business locations in Texas, and can be served with citation by serving its registered
`
`agent for service, The Corporation Company at 124 West Capitol Ave; Suite 1900, Little Rock, AR
`
`72201.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Tyson Foods, Inc. is subject to this Court’s specific personal jurisdiction under due
`
`process and the Texas Long Arm Statue. Defendant has minimum contacts within the State of Texas
`
`and the Eastern District of Texas, and Defendant’s contacts with the State of Texas resulted in Plaintiff
`
`sustaining injuries while working at a Tyson Food, Inc. plant located in Center, TX. The amount in
`
`controversy exceeds Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000).
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00089-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`4. Venue is proper in this District Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). This district is a
`
`judicial district in which a substantial part of the incident that is the subject of the action took place;
`
`and is one in which Defendant is subject to the Court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to this action.
`
`
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`5.
`
`On or about March 19, 2019 in Center, Shelby County, Texas, Plaintiff was working
`
`as an employee at Tyson Food, Inc., located at 1019 Shelbyville St, operating a piece of machinery
`
`used to cut chickens that he had been instructed to use by his supervisor, Sedrick Thomas.
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff had never worked on this particular machine in the approximately three years
`
`he had worked at Tyson. When he was instructed to work on this machine Plaintiff did not receive
`
`training or supervision on how to properly and safely operate this equipment with which he was
`
`unfamiliar.
`
`7.
`
`The Plaintiff was operating said machine, when suddenly and without warning,
`
`Plaintiff’s glove became caught in the saw mechanism of the machine causing injury.
`
`8.
`
`As a result of this incident, Plaintiff sustained injuries including the loss of three
`
`fingers.
`
`
`
`
`
`CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`9.
`
`At the time and on the occasion above-described, the Defendant, TYSON FOODS,
`
`INC., was guilty of the following acts of negligence:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Failure to properly train Plaintiff how to appropriately and safely operate the
`a.
`machine in question.
`
`Failure to properly and adequately supervise Plaintiff in the operation of the
`b.
`machine in question.
`
`Failure to provide Plaintiff proper safety equipment including proper gloves to
`c.
`prevent an incident of this nature
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00089-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Failure to properly maintain the equipment in question which resulted in
`d.
`Plaintiff’s injuries.
`
`Defendant knew, or should have known, failing to adequately train and
`e.
`supervise Plaintiff in the operation of said equipment could have resulted in an incident
`and injuries of this nature, yet failed to do so.
`
`10. Each of the above-described acts of negligence of Tyson Food, Inc.’s proximately
`
`caused the occurrence in question and resulting injuries and damages to the Plaintiff.
`
`
`GROSS NEGLIGENCE
`
`
`
`
`11.
`
`The wrong done by Defendant and/or their agents, servants, and officers was
`
`aggravated by the kind of conduct for which the law allows imposition of exemplary damages, in the
`
`Defendant’s conduct, when viewed objectively from Defendant’s standpoint at the time of the
`
`conduct, involved an extreme degree of risk, considering the probability and magnitude of the
`
`potential harm to others, and Defendant was actually, subjectively aware of the risk involved, but
`
`nevertheless proceeded with conscious indifference to the rights, safety, or welfare of others
`
`
`
`DAMAGES
`
`12.
`
`As a result of the above described negligence, the Plaintiff, DANNY NORRIS
`
`COLEMAN has been injured in the following respects:
`
`a. Past physical pain, suffering, and mental anguish;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`b. Hospital, medical, doctor, ambulance and pharmaceutical bills incurred in the past;
`
`c. Physical impairment to the person of the Plaintiff that has been incurred in the past;
`
`d. Physical pain, suffering, and mental anguish that the Plaintiff will, in all reasonable
`medical probability, suffer in the future;
`
`e. Hospital, doctor, medical, and pharmaceutical bills which the Plaintiff will, in all
`reasonable medical probability, incur in the future;
`
`f. Physical impairment to the person of the Plaintiff which, in all reasonable medical
`probability, she will suffer in the future;
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00089-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`g. Loss of earnings and earning capacity in the past;
`
`
` h. Loss of earning capacity in the future;
`
`
`
`
`i. For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper
`
`
`
`INTEREST
`
`13.
`
`The Plaintiff hereby seeks all Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest in the
`
`maximum amounts as allowed by law on each separate and individual element of damage.
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF'S LIFE EXPECTANCY
`
`14.
`
`According to the United States Life Tables, 2018 National Vital Statistics Reports;
`
`Vol. 69, No. 12, Plaintiff has a life expectancy of 20.3 years and Plaintiff intends to use a certified
`
`copy of the United States Life Tables, 2018 National Vital Statistics Reports; Vol. 69 No. 12, and
`
`offer same into evidence at the time of trial.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff hereby requests a trial by jury.
`
`PRAYER
`
`WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff respectfully prays that upon a final
`
`hearing she have judgment against the Defendant, Tyson Food, Inc. for the injuries and damages he
`
`sustained in an amount exceeding $75,000.00 (Seventy Five Thousand Five Hundred and 0/100)
`
`DOLLARS; for pre-judgment interest; for all costs of suit, and for such other and further relief,
`
`general and special, legal and equitable, to which HE may be entitled to receive
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00089-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BADDERS LAW FIRM, PC
`4002 North Street
`
` Nacogdoches, Texas 7596
`
`(936) 564-6181 (telephone)
`
`(936)564-8095 (facsimile)
`
`badders@badderslaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ - Jeff B. Badders
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________
`JEFF B. BADDERS
`State Bar No. 01496850
`badders@badderslaw.com
`Matthew Hancock
`State Bar No. 24072138
`Matt.h@badderslaw.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00089-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6
`Case 2:21-cv-00089—JRG Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket