throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 21 Filed 07/01/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 193
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.; and ATI
`TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD.; TCL
`INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS (H.K.) LIMITED;
`TCL ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS LIMITED;
`TCL TECHNOLOGY GROUP CORPORATION;
`TTE CORPORATION; TCL HOLDINGS (BVI)
`LIMITED; TCL KING ELECTRICAL
`APPLIANCES (HUIZHOU) CO. LTD.;
`SHENZHEN TCL NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO.,
`LTD.; TCL MOKA INTERNATIONAL
`LIMITED; TCL SMART DEVICE (VIETNAM)
`CO., LTD; MANUFACTURAS AVANZADAS
`SA DE CV; TCL ELECTRONICS MEXICO, S
`DE RL DE CV; TCL OVERSEAS MARKETING
`LTD.; and REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`C. A. NO. 2:22-CV-00134
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`TCL’S SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER
`OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiffs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC (collectively,
`
`“AMD”) filed the Complaint in this action on May 5, 2022 (Dkt. 1) against, among others,
`
`defendants TCL Industries Holdings Co. Ltd., TCL Industries Holdings (H.K.) Limited, TCL
`
`Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL Technology Group Corporation, TTE Corporation, TCL
`
`Holdings (BVI) Limited, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd., Shenzhen TCL
`
`New Technologies Co., Ltd.—correct name TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.—, TCL MOKA
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 21 Filed 07/01/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 194
`
`International Limited, and TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd, Manufacturas Avanzadas SA
`
`de CV, TCL Electronics Mexico, S de RL de CV, and TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.
`
`(collectively, “TCL”).
`
`AMD alleges to have served six of the TCL entities on May 17 and May 18, 2022.
`
`(Dkt. 11‒16.) AMD believes that the service on these six entities was proper, whereas TCL
`
`disputes that this service was proper. AMD has not yet served the remaining seven TCL entities.
`
`On June 7, 2022, TCL filed a first unopposed application for extension of time for the six
`
`served TCL entities to respond to the Complaint. (Dkt. 17.) The Court granted the first
`
`unopposed application, and the current deadline for response to the Complaint is July 7, 2022.
`
`TCL and AMD have reached an agreement whereby TCL will waive service of the
`
`complaint for all TCL entities in exchange for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint
`
`to August 22, 2022.
`
`Based on the foregoing, TCL moves for a second unopposed extension of time to answer
`
`or otherwise respond to the Complaint for an additional 45 days, to and through August 22,
`
`2022.1 The requested extension is not sought for any improper purpose and would not unduly
`
`prejudice any part or suit. In fact, the collective 75 days of extension of time to answer for the
`
`earliest allegedly served TCL entities is less than the 90-day extension of time that would be
`
`provided under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 for waiver of service by a foreign entity.
`
`Counsel for TCL has conferred with counsel for AMD. This motion is unopposed.
`
`Therefore, TCL requests the Court extend the time to answer or otherwise respond to the
`
`Complaint to and through August 22, 2022.
`
`1 The 45-day period counting from July 7, 2022 ends on August 21, 2022, a Sunday. Hence,
`TCL seeks an extension of time to the following business day, August 22, 2022.
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 21 Filed 07/01/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 195
`
`Dated: July 1, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Kyle R. Canavera
`John P. Schnurer, TX Bar No. 24072628
`JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com
`Kyle R. Canavera, CA Bar No. 314664
`KCanavera@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11452 El Camino Real, Ste 300
`San Diego, California 92130-2080
`
`Attorneys for Defendants TCL Industries
`Holdings Co., Ltd.; TCL Industries Holdings
`(H.K.) Limited; TCL Electronics Holdings
`Limited; TCL Technology Group Corporation;
`TTE Corporation; TCL Holdings (BVI) Limited;
`TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co.
`Ltd.; Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co., Ltd.;
`TCL Moka International Limited; TCL Smart
`Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd; Manufacturas
`Avanzadas SA de CV; TCL Electronics Mexico, S
`de RL de CV; and TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 21 Filed 07/01/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 196
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on July 1, 2022 on all counsel of record, via the Court’s CM/ECF
`
`system.
`
`/s/ Kyle R. Canavera
`Kyle R. Canavera
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket