Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 07/01/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 201
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.; and ATI
`TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD.; TCL
`INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS (H.K.) LIMITED;
`TCL ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS LIMITED;
`TCL TECHNOLOGY GROUP CORPORATION;
`TTE CORPORATION; TCL HOLDINGS (BVI)
`LIMITED; TCL KING ELECTRICAL
`APPLIANCES (HUIZHOU) CO. LTD.;
`SHENZHEN TCL NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO.,
`LTD.; TCL MOKA INTERNATIONAL
`LIMITED; TCL SMART DEVICE (VIETNAM)
`CO., LTD; MANUFACTURAS AVANZADAS
`SA DE CV; TCL ELECTRONICS MEXICO, S
`DE RL DE CV; TCL OVERSEAS MARKETING
`LTD.; and REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`C. A. NO. 2:22-CV-00134
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO MOVE TO STAY AND TO SERVE
`INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`Plaintiffs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC (collectively,
`
`“AMD”) and Defendants TCL Industries Holdings Co. Ltd., TCL Industries Holdings (H.K.)
`
`Limited, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL Technology Group Corporation, TTE
`
`Corporation, TCL Holdings (BVI) Limited, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd.,
`
`Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co., Ltd.—correct name TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.—,
`
`TCL MOKA International Limited, and TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd, Manufacturas
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.; and ATI
`TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD.; TCL
`INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS (H.K.) LIMITED;
`TCL ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS LIMITED;
`TCL TECHNOLOGY GROUP CORPORATION;
`TTE CORPORATION; TCL HOLDINGS (BVI)
`LIMITED; TCL KING ELECTRICAL
`APPLIANCES (HUIZHOU) CO. LTD.;
`SHENZHEN TCL NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO.,
`LTD.; TCL MOKA INTERNATIONAL
`LIMITED; TCL SMART DEVICE (VIETNAM)
`CO., LTD; MANUFACTURAS AVANZADAS
`SA DE CV; TCL ELECTRONICS MEXICO, S
`DE RL DE CV; TCL OVERSEAS MARKETING
`LTD.; and REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`C. A. NO. 2:22-CV-00134
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO MOVE TO STAY AND TO SERVE
`INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`Plaintiffs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC (collectively,
`
`“AMD”) and Defendants TCL Industries Holdings Co. Ltd., TCL Industries Holdings (H.K.)
`
`Limited, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL Technology Group Corporation, TTE
`
`Corporation, TCL Holdings (BVI) Limited, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd.,
`
`Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co., Ltd.—correct name TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.—,
`
`TCL MOKA International Limited, and TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd, Manufacturas
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 07/01/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 202
`
`
`
`Avanzadas SA de CV, TCL Electronics Mexico, S de RL de CV, and TCL Overseas Marketing
`
`Ltd. (collectively, “TCL”) have reached an agreement to extend certain deadlines in the instant
`
`action, and AMD and TCL hereby seek an order by the Court entering the AMD’s and TCL’s
`
`agreement as follows:
`
`I.
`
`On May 5, 2022, AMD filed the Complaint in this action (Dkt. 1). AMD filed a parallel
`
`investigation in the United States International Trade Commission, which was instituted on June
`
`1, 2022, In re Matter of Certain Graphics Systems, Components Thereof, and Digital Televisions
`
`Containing the Same, No. 337-TA-1318. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a), TCL has a right to seek
`
`a mandatory stay of this action due to the parallel ITC Investigation up to and through July 1, 2022.
`
`II.
`
`On June 14, 2022, the Court set a scheduling conference for this case, which is scheduled
`
`to occur on July 19, 2022 (Dkt. 18 (“Order”)). Pursuant to the Order, the deadline for AMD to
`
`comply with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 (Infringement Contentions) is July 5, 2022 and the deadline for TCL
`
`to comply with P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 (Invalidity Contentions) and to comply with the Standing Order
`
`Regarding Subject-Matter Eligibility Contentions is August 30, 2022.
`
`III.
`
`AMD and TCL agree that extensions are appropriate for the foregoing deadlines to seek a
`
`stay of present proceeding and to serve substantive contentions in order to allow parallel
`
`proceedings to move forward in the ITC Investigation, and to give the parties further time to
`
`determine whether a stay of this case is appropriate.
`
`IV.
`
`AMD and TCL request the Court to enter an order extending the foregoing deadlines as
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 07/01/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 203
`
`
`
`follows:
`
` That the deadline for TCL to seek a mandatory stay of this case be extended by
`
`three weeks to July 22, 2022, a motion on which AMD will join TCL if filed by
`
`the extended deadline;
`
` That the deadline for AMD to comply with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 (Infringement
`
`Contentions) be extended by three weeks to July 26, 2022;
`
` That the deadline for TCL to comply with P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 (Invalidity
`
`Contentions) and to comply with the Standing Order Regarding Subject-Matter
`
`Eligibility Contentions be extended by three weeks to September 20, 2022.
`
`Current Deadline New Deadline
`July 1, 2022
`July 22, 2022
`
`July 26, 2022
`
`Description
`Deadline for TCL to seek a mandatory stay of this
`case
`Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement
`Contentions)
`September 20, 2022 Comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 (Invalidity
`Contentions)
`September 20, 2022 Comply with Standing Order Regarding Subject-
`Matter Eligibility Contentions
`
`July 5, 2022
`
`August 30, 2022
`
`August 30, 2022
`
`
`
`V.
`
`The Parties do not file this Joint Motion for the purpose of delay, but rather to allow the
`
`Parties to adequately address the issues associated with the pending Contentions and in order that
`
`justice be done.
`
`
`
`Dated: July 1, 2022
`
`
`By: /s/ Eric H. Findlay
`Eric H. Findlay
`State Bar No. 00789886
`Brian Craft
`State Bar No. 04972020
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Kyle R. Canavera
`John P. Schnurer, TX Bar No. 24072628
`JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com
`Kyle R. Canavera, CA Bar No. 314664
`KCanavera@perkinscoie.com
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 07/01/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 204
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11452 El Camino Real, Ste 300
`San Diego, California 92130-2080
`
`Attorneys for Defendants TCL Industries
`Holdings Co., Ltd.; TCL Industries Holdings
`(H.K.) Limited; TCL Electronics Holdings
`Limited; TCL Technology Group Corporation;
`Tte Corporation; TCL Holdings (BVI) Limited;
`TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co.
`Ltd.; Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co.,
`Ltd.; TCL Moka International Limited; TCL
`Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd; Manufacturas
`Avanzadas SA de CV; TCL Electronics Mexico,
`S de RL de CV; and TCL Overseas Marketing
`Ltd.
`
`
`
`FINDLAY CRAFT, P.C.
`102 N. College Ave. Suite 900
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: (903) 534-1100
`Fax: (903) 534-1137
`Email: efindlay@findlaycraft.com
`Email: bcraft@findlaycraft.com
`
`Michael T. Renaud
`James M. Wodarski
`Michael J. McNamara
`Adam S. Rizk
`William Meunier
`Marguerite McConihe
`Matthew A. Karambelas
`Catherine Xu
`Tianyi Tan
`MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS
` GLOVSKY AND POPEO PC
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`617-542-6000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI
`Technologies ULC
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record have met and conferred in
`
`accordance with Local Rule CV-7(h) and the parties jointly request the relief sought herein.
`
`
`
`/s/ Eric H. Findlay
` Eric H. Findlay
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 07/01/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 205
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on July 1, 2022 on all counsel of record, via the Court’s CM/ECF
`
`system.
`
`/s/ Eric H. Findlay
`Eric H. Findlay
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
