`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
`and ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
` Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO.,
`LTD., ET AL.,
` Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP
`
`Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion To Stay Case Pending Resolution Of Parallel
`
`U.S. International Trade Commission filed by Defendants TCL Industries Holdings (H.K.) Co.,
`
`Ltd., TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL Technology Group Corporation, TTE Corporation,
`
`TCL Holdings (BVI) Limited, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd., Shenzhen
`
`TCL New Technologies Co., Ltd.—correct name Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.—,
`
`TCL MOKA International Limited, TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., Manufacturas
`
`Avanzadas SA de CV, TCL Electronics Mexico, S de RL de CV, and TCL Overseas Marketing
`
`Ltd. (collectively, “TCL”). Dkt. No. 36.
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a), a court shall stay a civil action “at the request of a party
`
`to the civil action that is also a respondent in the proceeding before the [ITC]” until the ITC
`
`proceeding is final with respect to same issues in the civil action. Id. Therefore, because TCL is a
`
`party to this action and a respondent in the ITC proceeding that involves substantially the same
`
`patents, products, parties, and issues, the Court GRANTS TCL’s motion (Dkt. No. 36). It is
`
`therefore ORDERED that the case is stayed with respect to TCL pending resolution of the ITC
`
`proceeding.
`
`