throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 53 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 804
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.; and ATI
`TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD.; TCL
`INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS (H.K.) LIMITED;
`TCL ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS LIMITED;
`TCL TECHNOLOGY GROUP CORPORATION;
`TTE CORPORATION; TCL HOLDINGS (BVI)
`LIMITED; TCL KING ELECTRICAL
`APPLIANCES (HUIZHOU) CO. LTD.;
`SHENZHEN TCL NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO.,
`LTD.; TCL MOKA INTERNATIONAL
`LIMITED; TCL SMART DEVICE (VIETNAM)
`CO., LTD; MANUFACTURAS AVANZADAS
`SA DE CV; TCL ELECTRONICS MEXICO, S
`DE RL DE CV; TCL OVERSEAS MARKETING
`LTD.; and REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`C. A. NO. 2:22-CV-00134
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORAL HEARING REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
`MOTION FOR DISCRETIONARY STAY OF REMAINDER OF ACTION PENDING
`FINAL DETERMINATION BY THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`OF INVESTIGATION NO 337-TA-1318
`
`Defendant Realtek Semiconductor Corp. (“Realtek”) respectfully requests an oral hearing
`
`that addresses Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion for Discretionary Stay of Remainder of Action
`
`Pending Final Determination By the International Trade Commission of Investigation No. 337-
`
`TA-1318 (Dkt. 37). On August 5, 2022 Realtek filed a Response (Dkt. 43) and on August 12,
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 53 Filed 08/25/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 805
`
`2022, Plaintiffs’ reply (Dkt. 45) was filed. Realtek believes oral argument will assist the Court
`
`in making its determination on this pending motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 25, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ G. Blake Thompson
` By:
`
` G. Blake Thompson
`
` State Bar No. 24042033
`
` blake@themannfirm.com
`
` J. Mark Mann
`
` State Bar No. 12926150
`
` mark@themannfirm.com
` MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON
` 201 E. Howard St.
` Henderson, Texas 75654
` (903) 657-8540
` (903) 657-6003 (fax)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 53 Filed 08/25/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 806
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
` I certify that on August 24, 2022, I conferred with counsel for Plaintiffs by email and
`
`they have advised they are unopposed to the filing of this motion.
`
`/s/ G. Blake Thompson
`G. Blake Thompson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered
`
`electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record,
`
`on this 25 day of August, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ G. Blake Thompson
`
`G. Blake Thompson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket