throbber
Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 281 Filed 01/22/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:
`13515
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et
`al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS,
`LLC, D/B/A XFINITY, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Lead Case No. 2:23-cv-00059-JRG
`Member Case No. 2:23-cv-00062-JRG
`
`
`THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT NOTICE REGARDING
`PRETRIAL AGREEMENTS
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Touchstream Technologies, Inc. (“Touchstream”) and Defendants Comcast
`
`Cable Communications, LLC, et al. (“Comcast”) jointly submit this third supplemental notification
`
`of agreements further narrowing disputes in advance of the pretrial conference on January 23,
`
`2024.1
`
`
`
`Attached as Exhibits A1 (Joint Exhibit List), A2 (Touchstream’s Non-Joint Exhibit
`
`List), and A3 (Comcast’s Non-Joint Exhibit List) are the parties’ revised exhibit lists, which reflect
`
`the parties’ further narrowing of objections. Also attached as Exhibit B is the parties’ revised day
`
`
`1 The parties’ proposed jury instructions remain unchanged from the joint submission on
`December 16, 2024. See Dkt. No. 222, Ex. B.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 281 Filed 01/22/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:
`13516
`
`1 deposition designations and objections, which reflect the parties’ further narrowing of
`
`designations, counter-designations, and objections thereto. The parties have agreed to the exhibits
`
`on the Joint Exhibit List only insofar as they are not excluded by the Court’s rulings on the parties’
`
`motions to strike and motions for summary judgment, and the parties reserve the right to object to
`
`any exhibits currently on the Joint Exhibit List as well as any deposition designations should the
`
`Court grant any of those motions.
`
`Although the parties preserve their objections to the exhibits and designations in Exhibits
`
`A1, A2, A3, and B that are implicated by their motions in limine, the parties have removed certain
`
`objections because Magistrate Judge Payne has resolved them in his rulings on the parties’ Motions
`
`in Limine.
`
`Specifically, while Comcast objects to the admissibility of PTX-020, PTX-021, PTX-
`
`022, PTX-024, PTX-026, PTX-027, PTX-029, PTX-031, PTX-032, PTX-033, PTX-085, JTX-
`
`018, JTX-020, JTX-021, JTX-022, JTX-023, JTX-024, JTX-027, JTX-063, JTX-064, DTX-029,
`
`DTX-031, DTX-032, DTX-035, DTX-041, DTX-044, DTX-050, DTX-051, DTX-054, DTX-056,
`
`and DTX-078, as well as certain deposition testimony of Jamie Cohen, Tony Werner, Jeffrey
`
`Pinard, Linda Yaccarino, Gil Beyda, Michael Rinzler, and Rajiv Lulla under Fed. R. Evid. 402
`
`and 403 for the reasons stated in Comcast’s Motion in Limine No. 3, those objections have been
`
`resolved in the ruling on that motion. Similarly, while Comcast objects to DTX-083, as well as
`
`certain deposition testimony of Anandhan Subbiah and Sharon Cilione-Berger, under Fed. R. Evid.
`
`402 and 403 for the reasons stated in Comcast’s Motion in Limine No. 2, those objections have
`
`been resolved in the ruling on that motion. Finally, while Comcast objects to PTX-009, as well as
`
`certain deposition testimony of Ernest Pighini and Scott Manning, under Fed. R. Evid. 402 and
`
`403 for the reasons stated in Comcast’s Motion in Limine No. 4, those objections have been
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 281 Filed 01/22/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:
`13517
`
`resolved in the ruling on that motion.
`
`Furthermore, Touchstream has withdrawn objections to certain exhibits and deposition
`
`testimony in view of the Court’s rulings on the Motions in Limine. Touchstream has also
`
`withdrawn certain affirmative designations for the deposition of Tony Werner based on the Court’s
`
`ruling on Comcast’s Motion in Limine No. 1.
`
`The parties have further agreed that Touchstream’s authentication and foundation
`
`objections to DTX-017 will be deferred until foundation can be laid through a trial witness.
`
`Touchstream also notes that Comcast’s FRE 602 objections to Mr. Tony Werner’s
`
`deposition designations at 122:20-123:7, 125:5-9, 126:6-13, and 126:19-24 were raised the day
`
`before the parties’ January 23, 2025, pre-trial conference. Comcast previously dropped its FRE
`
`602 objection to the designated testimony at 126:6-13 and has not previously raised FRE 602
`
`objections to the rest of the cited testimony. Comcast has added these objections because the
`
`designated testimony relates to PTX-033, which Touchstream had previously withdrawn from its
`
`exhibit list and which it added back to the exhibit list on January 20, 2025.
`
`
`
`The parties reserve the right to amend, supplement, or modify these proposed materials
`
`as the case proceeds toward trial and as the parties continue to meet and confer regarding these
`
`materials in an attempt to further remove disputed issues.
`
`Date: January 22, 2025
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Ryan Dykal s
`Lead Counsel
`
`Ryan D. Dykal (pro hac vice)
`Jordan T. Bergsten (pro hac vice)
`Mark Schafer (pro hac vice)
`Philip A. Eckert (pro hac vice)
`Anita Liu (TX State Bar No. 24134054)
`BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
`1401 New York Ave, NW
`
`/s/ Ashok Ramani s
`Lead Counsel
`
`Ashok Ramani (CA Bar No. 200020)
`David J. Lisson (CA Bar No. 250994)
`James Y. Park (CA Bar No. 343659)
`Keon Zemoudeh (CA Bar No. 343023)
`DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
`900 Middlefield Rd., Suite 200
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 281 Filed 01/22/25 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:
`13518
`
`Washington, DC, DC 20005
`(t) 202-274-1109
`rdykal@bsfllp.com
`jbergsten@bsfllp.com
`mschafer@bsfllp.com
`peckert@bsfllp.com
`aliu@bsfllp.com
`
`John Michael Lyons (pro hac vice)
`Sabina Mariella (pro hac vice)
`Sophie Roytblat (pro hac vice)
`BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
`55 Hudson Yards, 20th Floor
`New York, NY 10001
`jlyons@bsfllp.com
`smariella@bsfllp.com
`sroytblat@bsfllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Melissa Smith
`(TX State Bar No. 24001351)
`GILLAM & SMITH LLP
`303 S. Washington Ave.
`Marshall, TX 75670
`(t) 903-934-8450
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ashok.ramani@davispolk.com
`david.lisson@davispolk.com
`james.park@davispolk.com
`keon.zemoudeh@davispolk.com
`
`Alena Farber (NY Bar No. 5896170)
`DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
`450 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10017
`alena.farber@davispolk.com
`
`Deron Dacus (State Bar No. 00790553)
`THE DACUS FIRM, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, TX 75701
`Tel:(903) 705-1117
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`Thomas G. Saunders (NY Bar No. 4429387)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
`DORR LLP
`2100 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
`Washington, DC 20007
`thomas.saunders@wilmerhale.com
`Lauren E. Matlock-Colangelo (NY Bar No.
`5771340)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
`DORR LLP
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich St
`New York, NY 10007
`lauren.matlock-colangelo@wilmerhale.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants Comcast Cable
`Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable
`Communications Management, LLC, Comcast of
`Houston, LLC, and Comcast Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket