`14163
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS,
`LLC, d/b/a XFINITY, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`Lead Case No. 2:23-cv-00059-JRG
`Member Case No. 2:23-cv-00062-JRG
`
`COMCAST’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
`MOTION TO COMPEL ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY ON COMCAST’S
`SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OUT OF TIME
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7(k), Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast
`
`Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, and Comcast of Houston,
`
`LLC (together, “Comcast”) move for leave to file its Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel
`
`Additional Discovery on Comcast’s Supplemental Disclosures (the “Opposition”) out of time
`
`(Dkt. Nos. 323 and 324). The Court specially set the deadline to file the Opposition to be 12:00
`
`p.m. CST on February 13, 2025 (Dkt. No. 315). Comcast inadvertently filed its Opposition and
`
`attachments after the noon deadline. Comcast apologizes for the error and respectfully requests
`
`the Court grant leave to file its Opposition out of time. Comcast sought confirmation from
`
`counsel for Plaintiff that it does not oppose but did not receive a response before filing the
`
`instant motion for leave. A Proposed Order granting this Motion is attached for the Court’s
`
`convenience.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 325 Filed 02/13/25 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:
`14164
`
`Dated: February 13, 2025
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ David J. Lisson
`Deron Dacus (State Bar No. 00790553)
`THE DACUS FIRM, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, TX 75701
`Tel:
`(903) 705-1117
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
`Ashok Ramani (CA Bar No. 200020)
`David J. Lisson (CA Bar No. 250994)
`James Y. Park (CA Bar No. 343659)
`Keon Zemoudeh (CA Bar No. 343023)
`900 Middlefield Road, Suite 200
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`ashok.ramani@davispolk.com
`david.lisson@davispolk.com
`james.park@davispolk.com
`keon.zemoudeh@davispolk.com
`
`Alena Farber (NY Bar No. 5896170)
`450 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10017
`alena.farber@davispolk.com
`
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
`Thomas G. Saunders (DC Bar No. 503012)
`2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20037
`thomas.saunders@wilmerhale.com
`
`Lauren Matlock-Colangelo
`(NY Bar No. 5771340)
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich Street
`New York, NY 10007
`lauren.matlock-colangelo@wilmerhale.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants Comcast Corporation,
`Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast
`Cable Communications Management, LLC, and
`Comcast of Houston, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 325 Filed 02/13/25 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:
`14165
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on February 13, 2025 a true and correct copy of the
`
`above and foregoing document has been served on all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David J. Lisson
`David J. Lisson
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`Comcast sought confirmation from counsel for Plaintiff that it does not oppose but did
`
`not receive a response before filing the instant motion for leave.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David J. Lisson
`David J. Lisson
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
