`#: 14755
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et
`al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS,
`LLC, d/b/a XFINITY, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Lead Case No. 2:23-cv-00059-JRG
`Member Case No. 2:23-cv-00062-JRG
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER SUSTAINING COMCAST’S OBJECTION
`TO THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION DENYING
`COMCAST’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`Before the Court is Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable
`
`Communications Management, LLC, Comcast of Houston, LLC, and Comcast Corporation’s
`
`(collectively, “Comcast”) Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report & Recommendation
`
`Denying Comcast’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the “Objection”).
`
`Having considered the Objection, the Report & Recommendation, related briefing, and
`
`relevant authorities, the Court concludes that the Objection should be SUSTAINED.
`
`It is hereby ORDERED that Comcast’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,
`
`Dkt. No. 85, is GRANTED.
`
`