`14846
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP
`
`
` §
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et
`al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`Before the Court is the Corrected Joint Motion for Leave to Serve Supplemental Expert
`
`Reports (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Touchstream Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and
`
`Defendants Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Spectrum
`
`Management Holding Company, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises, LLC, Spectrum Gulf
`
`Coast, LLC, Charter Communications, LLC (collectively, “Defendants” and with Plaintiff, the
`
`“Parties”). (Dkt. No. 354.) In the Motion, the Parties argue that good cause exists to serve
`
`supplemental damages expert reports to provide accurate damages calculations in view of the
`
`Court’s pretrial rulings. (Id. at 3.) The Parties further argue that good cause exists for the Court to
`
`grant Defendants leave to replace PTX-044, which is an interrogatory response, with a recent
`
`supplemental interrogatory response. (Id. at 4.) Finally, the Parties argue that good cause exists for
`
`the Court to grant Plaintiff leave to supplement its technical expert report in view of the
`
`supplemental interrogatory response. (Id.)
`
`Having considered the Motion, noting its joint nature, and finding good cause, the Court
`
`finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Parties
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 362 Filed 02/28/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
`14847
`
`have leave to serve supplemental expert reports and for Plaintiff to amend its exhibit list to replace
`
`PTX-044.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of February, 2025.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
