Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:
`15308
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`TOUCHSTREAM §
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC., §
`Plaintiff, §§
`v- § CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00059-JRG-RSP
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, §
`INC.,ETAL., §
`§
`Defendants. „
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you are
`
`to follow all the instructions that I have given you in the Court s Final Jury Instructions.
`
`Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the questions contain legal
`
`terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final Jury Instructions. You should
`
`refer to and consider the Final Jury Instructions as you answer the questions in this
`
`Verdict Form.
`
`
`15308
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`TOUCHSTREAM §
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC., §
`Plaintiff, §§
`v- § CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00059-JRG-RSP
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, §
`INC.,ETAL., §
`§
`Defendants. „
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you are
`
`to follow all the instructions that I have given you in the Court s Final Jury Instructions.
`
`Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the questions contain legal
`
`terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final Jury Instructions. You should
`
`refer to and consider the Final Jury Instructions as you answer the questions in this
`
`Verdict Form.
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:
`15309
`
`As used in this Verdict Form, the following terms have the following meanings:
`
`• Touchstream refers to Plaintiff, Touchstream Technologies, Inc.
`
`• “Charter refers collectively to Defendants: Charter Communications, Inc.,
`Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Spectrum Management Holding
`Company, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises, LLC, Spectrum Gulf Coast,
`LLC, and Charter Communications LLC.
`
`• The “ 251 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 8,356,251.
`
`• The “ 751 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 11,048,751.
`
`• The “’934 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 11,086,934.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:
`15310
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND ENSURE THAT YOUR
`
`VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:
`15311
`
`QUESTION NO. 1A
`
`Did Touchstream prove by a reponderance of the evidence that Charter infringed
`
`claims 1 and/or 7 of the 251 Patent?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`QUESTION NO. IB
`
`Did Touchstream prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Charter infringed
`
`claims 12 and/or 13 of the ’751 Patent?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`QUESTION NO. 1C
`
`Did Touchstream prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Charter infringed
`
`claims 17, 18, and/or 20 of the ’934 Patent?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:
`15312
`
`If you answered NO to Question Nos. 1A, IB, or 1C, then
`DO NOT answer the corresponding questions related to that
`atent from Question Nos. 2A, 2B, or 2C. For example, if you
`answered “YES” to Question No. 1A and “NO” to Question
`Nos. IB and 1C, then answer Question No. 2A but DO NOT
`answer Question Nos. 2B and 2C.
`
`Also, if you answered “NO” to Question Nos. 1A, IB, and 1C
`(all of them), then you SHOULD NOT answer any other
`question, and in that case proceed directly to the final page of
`the Verdict Form.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:
`15313
`
`QUESTION NO. 2A
`
`Did Charter prove by clear and convincing evidence that claims 1 and 7 of the 251
`
`Patent are invalid?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`UESTION NO. 2B
`
`Did Charter prove by clear and convincing evidence that claims 12 and 13 of the
`
`751 Patent are invalid?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`QUESTION NO. 2C
`
`Did Charter prove by clear and convincing evidence that claims 17, 18, and 20 of
`
`the ’934 Patent are invalid?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:
`15314
`
`Only answer Question Nos. 3 and 4 if you found that at least
`one of the asserted claims is both infringed ( YES to
`Question No. 1) and not invalid (“NO to Question No. 2).
`
`If you answered “NO to Question Nos. 2A, 2B, or 2C (any
`one of them), then you MUST answer Question Nos. 3 and 4.
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:
`15315
`
`QUESTION NO. 3
`
`Did Touchstream prove by a preponderance of the evidence that any infringement
`
`you have found was WILLFUL?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:
`15316
`
`QUESTION NO. 4A
`
`What sum of money, if paid now in cash, has Touchstream proven by a
`
`preponderance of the evidence would compensate it for its damages as to any
`
`infringement you have found?
`
`Answer in United States Dollars and Cents, if any:
`
`$
`
`QUESTION NO. 4B
`
`Are the damages for infringement which you awarded in Question No. 4A a Lump
`
`Sum or a Running Royalty?
`
`Lump Sum: Running Royalty:
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 379 Filed 03/07/25 Page 10 of 10 PageID
`#: 15317
`
`FINAL PAGE OF THE JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`
`
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Form and you should review it
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Jury Foreperson
`
`
`
`
`
`should then sign and date the Verdict Form in the spaces below. Once this is done,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`notify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The Jury
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Foreperson should keep the Verdict Form and bring it when the jury is brought back
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`into the courtroom.
`
`Signed this 7 �h day of March, 2025.
`
`_______________________________
`Jury Foreperson
`
`10
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
