`16478
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP
`
`
` §
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et
`al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`A jury trial commenced in the above-captioned case on March 3, 2025. On March 7, 2025,
`
`the jury reached and returned its unanimous verdict finding that Defendants Charter
`
`Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Spectrum Management Holding
`
`Company, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises, LLC, Spectrum Gulf Coast, LLC, and Charter
`
`Communications LLC (collectively, “Charter”) do not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent
`
`Nos. 8,356,251 (the “’251 Patent”), 11,048,751 (the “’751 Patent”), and 11,086,934 (the “’934
`
`Patent”). (Dkt. No. 380.)
`
`Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in accordance with the
`
`jury’s unanimous verdict and the entirety of the record, the Court hereby ORDERS and ENTERS
`
`JUDGMENT as follows:
`
`1. Charter has not infringed claims 1 or 7 of the ’251 Patent;
`
`2. Charter has not infringed claims 12 or 13 of the ’751 Patent;
`
`3. Charter has not infringed claims 17, 18, or 20 of the ’934 Patent;
`
`4. Plaintiff Touchstream Technologies, Inc. (“Touchstream”) takes nothing against
`
`Charter; and
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG-RSP Document 391 Filed 03/12/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
`16479
`
`5. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), Local Rule CV-54, and 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1920, Charter is the prevailing party in this case and shall recover its costs from
`
`Touchstream. Accordingly, Charter is directed to file its Bill of Costs.
`
`
`
`All other requests for relief now pending and requested by either Party but not specifically
`
`addressed herein are DENIED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`So Ordered this
`Mar 11, 2025
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
