throbber
Case 2:23-cv-00314-JRG Document 59 Filed 04/11/24 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1422
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`FORAS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
`
`v.
`
`VOLKSWAGEN AG, ET AL.,
`
`Case No. 2:23-cv-00314-JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`In accordance with the scheduling conference held in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that
`
`the following schedule of deadlines is in effect until further order of this Court:
`
`August 4, 2025
`
`*Jury Selection - 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas1
`
`7 days before Jury
`Selection
`
`10 days before Jury
`Selection
`
`July 7, 2025
`
`*Defendant to disclose final invalidity theories, final prior art
`references/combinations, and final equitable defenses.2
`
`*Plaintiff to disclose final election of Asserted Claims.3
`
`* If a juror questionnaire is to be used, an editable (in Microsoft Word
`format) questionnaire shall be jointly submitted to the Deputy Clerk in
`Charge by this date.4
`
`1 Lead counsel for Defendant Valeo SE is scheduled to be at trial in another court beginning on July 28,
`2025. That trial, which was set before the entry of this Docket Control Order, may proceed into the week
`of August 4, 2025. Counsel for Valeo SE is not requesting relief at this time, but is currently noticing
`counsel for the other parties and the Court of the present conflict with the Jury Selection date.
`
`2 The proposed DCO shall include this specific deadline. The deadline shall read, "7 days before Jury
`Selection," and shall not include a specific date.
`
`3 Given the Court's past experiences with litigants dropping claims and defenses during or on the eve
`of trial, the Court is of the opinion that these additional deadlines are necessary. The proposed DCO
`shall include this specific deadline. The deadline shall read, "10 days before Jury Selection," and shall
`not include a specific date.
`
`4 The Parties are referred to the Court's Standing Order Regarding Use of Juror Questionnaires in
`Advance of Voir Dire.
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00314-JRG Document 59 Filed 04/11/24 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 1423
`
`
`June 30, 2025
`
`
`June 23, 2025
`
`
`June 23, 2025
`
`
`June 16, 2025
`
`
`*Pretrial Conference - 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before Judge
`Rodney Gilstrap
`
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached During Meet and Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer on any outstanding objections
`or motions in limine. The parties shall advise the Court of any agreements
`reached no later than 1:00 p.m. three (3) business days before the pretrial
`conference.
`
`
`*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions, Joint Proposed
`Verdict Form, Responses to Motions in Limine, Updated Exhibit Lists,
`Updated Witness Lists, and Updated Deposition Designations
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is requested
`for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file a notice with the
`Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Shawn McRoberts, at
`shawn_mcroberts@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`
`File Motions in Limine
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine to issues that if improperly
`introduced at trial would be so prejudicial that the Court could not alleviate
`the prejudice by giving appropriate instructions to the jury.
`
`
`Serve Objections to Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`
`Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and Serve Rebuttal Pretrial
`Disclosures
`
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (Witness List, Deposition Designations, and
`Exhibit List) by the Party with the Burden of Proof
`
`
`*Response to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert Motions).
`
`Responses to dispositive motions that were filed prior to the dispositive
`motion deadline, including Daubert Motions, shall be due in accordance
`with Local Rule CV-7(e), not to exceed the deadline as set forth in this
`Docket Control Order.5 Motions for Summary Judgment shall comply
`
`5 The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in part that "[a] party's failure
`to oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein creates a presumption that the party does
`not controvert the facts set out by movant and has no evidence to offer in opposition to the
`motion."
`
`
`
`June 9, 2025
`
`
`June 9, 2025
`
`
`June 2, 2025
`
`
`
`May 19, 2025
`
`
`
`May 12, 2025
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00314-JRG Document 59 Filed 04/11/24 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 1424
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with Local Rule CV-56.
`
`*File Motions to Strike Expert Testimony (including Daubert
`Motions)
`
`No motion to strike expert testimony (including a Daubert motion) may
`be filed after this date without leave of the Court.
`
`*File Dispositive Motions
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date without leave of the
`Court. 6
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and Local Rule CV-7.
`Motions to extend page limits will only be granted in exceptional
`circumstances. Exceptional circumstances require more than agreement
`among the parties.
`
`
`Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery
`
`
`Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`
`Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the Party with the Burden of
`Proof
`
`
`Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File Motions to Compel
`Discovery
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7 (Opinion of Counsel Defenses)
`
`
`Submit Joint Notice Indicating Whether the Case Should Be Referred
`For Mediation
`
`
`April 28, 2025
`
`
`April 28, 2025
`
`
`April 21, 2025
`
`April 7, 2025
`
`
`March 17, 2025
`
`
`March 7, 2025
`
`
`February 24, 2025
`
`2 weeks After
`Court’s Issuance of
`Claim Construction
`Order
`
`February 3, 2025
`
`
`January 21, 2025
`
`
`January 13, 2025
`
`
`January 6, 2025
`
`
`*Claim Construction Hearing - 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before
`Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(d) (Joint Claim Construction Chart)
`
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(c) (Reply Claim Construction Brief)
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(b) (Responsive Claim Construction Brief)
`
`6 If the deadline under Local Rule CV 7(e) exceeds the deadline for Response to Dispositive Motions,
`the deadline for Response to Dispositive Motion controls.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00314-JRG Document 59 Filed 04/11/24 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 1425
`
`
`December 23, 2024
`
`
`December 23, 2024
`
`
`December 9, 2024
`
`
`December 2, 2024
`
`November 18, 2024
`
`
`November 12, 2024
`
`October 21, 2024
`
`September 30, 2024
`
`July 22, 2024
`
`
`July 22, 2024
`May 20, 2024
`
`April 15, 2024
`
`
`
`to Complete Claim Construction
`
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(a) (Opening Claim Construction Brief) and
`Submit Technical Tutorials (if any)
`Good cause must be shown to submit technical tutorials after the
`deadline to comply with P.R. 4-5(a).
`
`
`Deadline to Substantially Complete Document Production and Exchange
`Privilege Logs
`
`Counsel are expected to make good faith efforts to produce all required
`documents as soon as they are available and not wait until the substantial
`completion deadline.
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-4 (Deadline
`Discovery)
`
`
`File Response to Amended Pleadings
`
`
`*File Amended Pleadings
`
`It is not necessary to seek leave of Court to amend pleadings prior to this
`deadline unless the amendment seeks to assert additional patents.
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-3 (Joint Claim Construction Statement)
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-2 (Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions)
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-1 (Exchange Proposed Claim Terms)
`
`
`Comply with Standing Order Regarding Subject-Matter Eligibility
`Contentions7
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4(b) (Invalidity Contentions)
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-4(a)
`
`*File Proposed Protective Order and Comply with Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the
`Discovery Order (Initial and Additional Disclosures)
`
`The Proposed Protective Order shall be filed as a separate motion with the
`caption indicating whether or not the proposed order is opposed in any part.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7http://www.txed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/judgeFiles/EDTX%20Standing%200rder%20
`Re%20Subject%20Matter%20Eligibility%20Contentions%20.pdf
`[https://perma.cc/RQN2-
`YU5P]
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00314-JRG Document 59 Filed 04/11/24 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 1426
`
`April 8, 2024
`
`
`April 1, 2024
`
`March 11, 2024
`
`
`
`*File Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed Discovery Order
`
`The Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed Discovery Order shall be
`filed as separate motions with the caption indicating whether or not the
`proposed order is opposed in any part.
`
`
`Join Additional Parties
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement Contentions)
`
`
`
`(*) indicates a deadline that cannot be changed without an acceptable showing of good
`cause. Good cause is not shown merely by indicating that the parties agree that the
`deadline should be changed.
`
`
`ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`
`Mediation: While certain cases may benefit from mediation, such may not be appropriate for
`every case. The Court finds that the Parties are best suited to evaluate whether mediation will benefit
`the case after the issuance of the Court's claim construction order. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS
`the Parties to file a Joint Notice indicating whether the case should be referred for mediation within
`fourteen days of the issuance of the Court's claim construction order. As a part of such Joint Notice,
`the Parties should indicate whether they have a mutually agreeable mediator for the Court to consider.
`If the Parties disagree about whether mediation is appropriate, the Parties should set forth a brief
`statement of their competing positions in the Joint Notice.
`
`
`Summary Judgment Motions, Motions to Strike Expert Testimony, and Daubert
`Motions: For each motion, the moving party shall provide the Court with two (2) hard copies of the
`completed briefing (opening motion, response, reply, and if applicable, sur-reply), excluding exhibits,
`in D-three-ring binders, appropriately tabbed. All documents shall be single-sided and must include
`the CM/ECF header. These copies shall be delivered to the Court within three (3) business days after
`briefing has completed. For expert-related motions, complete digital copies of the relevant expert
`report(s) and accompanying exhibits shall be submitted on a single flash drive to the Court. Complete
`digital copies of the expert report(s) shall be delivered to the Court no later than the dispositive motion
`deadline.
`
`
`Indefiniteness: In lieu of early motions for summary judgment, the parties are directed to
`include any arguments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their Markman briefing, subject to the
`local rules' normal page limits.
`
`Lead Counsel: The Parties are directed to Local Rule CV-1 l(a)(l), which provides that "[o]n
`the first appearance through counsel, each party shall designate a lead attorney on the pleadings or
`otherwise." Additionally, once designated, a party's lead attorney may only be changed by the filing of
`a Motion to Change Lead Counsel and thereafter obtaining from the Court an Order granting leave to
`designate different lead counsel. The true lead counsel should be designated early and should not
`expect to parachute in as lead once the case has been largely developed.
`
`Motions for Continuance: The following will not warrant a continuance nor justify a failure
`to comply with the discovery deadline:
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00314-JRG Document 59 Filed 04/11/24 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 1427
`
`The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;
`
`The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day, unless
`the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special provision for
`the parties in the other case;
`
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`
`(c)
`
`The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it was
`impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.
`
`
`Amendments to the Docket Control Order ("DCO"): Any motion to alter any date on the DCO
`shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion to amend the DCO shall include a
`proposed order that lists all of the remaining dates in one column (as above) and the proposed changes
`to each date in an additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a date the proposed date column
`should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). In other words, the DCO in the proposed order
`should be complete such that one can clearly see all the remaining deadlines and the changes, if any,
`to those deadlines, rather than needing to also refer to an earlier version of the DCO.
`
`Proposed DCO: The Parties' Proposed DCO should also follow the format described above under
`"Amendments to the Docket Control Order ('DCO')."
`
`Joint Pretrial Order: In the contentions of the Parties included in the Joint Pretrial Order, the Plaintiff
`shall specify all allegedly infringed claims that will be asserted at trial. The Plaintiff shall also specify
`the nature of each theory of infringement, including under which subsections of 35 U.S.C. § 271 it
`alleges infringement, and whether the Plaintiff alleges divided infringement or infringement under the
`doctrine of equivalents. Each Defendant shall indicate the nature of each theory of invalidity, including
`invalidity for anticipation, obviousness, subject-matter eligibility, written description, enablement, or
`any other basis for invalidity. The Defendant shall also specify each prior art reference or combination
`of references upon which the Defendant shall rely at trial, with respect to each theory of invalidity. The
`contentions of the Parties may not be amended, supplemented, or dropped without leave of the Court
`based upon a showing of good cause.
`
`Trial: All parties must appear in person at trial. All non-individual (including but not limited to
`corporate) parties must appear at trial through the presence in person of a designated representative.
`Once they have appeared, any representative of a non-individual party shall not be replaced or
`substituted without express leave of Court.
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of April, 2024.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket