Case 2:24-cv-00331-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 648
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`SLYDE ANALYTICS LLC,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:24-CV-00331-RWS-RSP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`In accordance with the Scheduling Conference held in this case on September 5, 2024, it
`
`is hereby ORDERED that the following schedule of deadlines is in effect until further order of
`
`this Court:
`
`Original Deadline New Deadline
`
`
`April 20, 2026
`
`7 days before Jury
`Selection
`
`10 days before Jury
`Selection
`
`March 23, 2026
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas
`
`*Defendant to disclose final invalidity theories,
`final prior art references/combinations, and final
`equitable defenses with notice of the same filed
`with the Court.
`
`*Plaintiff to disclose final election of Asserted
`Claims.
`
`* If a juror questionnaire is to be used, an editable
`(in Microsoft Word format) questionnaire shall be
`jointly submitted to the Deputy Clerk in Charge by
`this date.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The Parties are referred to the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Use of Juror Questionnaires in
`Advance of Voir Dire.
`
`

`

`Case 2:24-cv-00331-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 09/23/24 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 649
`
`Original Deadline New Deadline
`
`
`March 17, 2026
`
`March 9, 2026
`
`March 9, 2025
`
`March 2, 2026
`
`February 23, 2026
`
`February 23, 2026
`
`February 17, 2026
`
`February 2, 2026
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall,
`Texas before Judge Roy Payne
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached During
`Meet and Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer on any
`outstanding objections or motions in limine. The
`parties shall advise the Court of any agreements
`reached no later than 1:00 p.m. three (3) business
`days before the pretrial conference.
`
`*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury
`Instructions,
`Joint Proposed Verdict Form,
`Responses to Motions in Limine, Updated Exhibit
`Lists, Updated Witness Lists, and Updated
`Deposition Designations
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or
`Real Time Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial, the party or
`parties making said request shall file a notice with
`the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Shawn
`McRoberts, at shelly_holmes@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`File Motions in Limine
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine to
`issues that if improperly introduced at trial would
`be so prejudicial that the Court could not alleviate
`the prejudice by giving appropriate instructions to
`the jury.
`
`Serve Objections to Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and Serve
`Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`(Witness List,
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures
`Deposition Designations, and Exhibit List) by the
`Party with the Burden of Proof
`
`

`

`Case 2:24-cv-00331-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 09/23/24 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 650
`
`Original Deadline New Deadline
`
`
`January 26, 2026
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`January 12, 2026
`
`January 12, 2026
`
`January 5, 2026
`
`December 22, 2025
`
`December 1, 2025
`
`December 1, 2025
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*Response to Dispositive Motions (including
`Daubert Motions). Responses
`to dispositive
`motions that were filed prior to the dispositive
`motion deadline, including Daubert Motions, shall
`be due in accordance with Local Rule CV-7(e), not
`to exceed the deadline as set forth in this Docket
`Control Order.2 Motions for Summary Judgment
`shall comply with Local Rule CV-56.
`
`*File Motions
`(including
`
`to Strike Expert Testimony
`Motions)
`Daubert
`
`No motion to strike expert testimony (including a
`Daubert motion) may be filed after this date
`without leave of the Court.
`
`*File Dispositive Motions
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date
`without leave of the Court.
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and
`Local Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits
`will only be granted in exceptional circumstances.
`Exceptional circumstances require more than
`agreement among the parties.
`
`Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery
`
`Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File
`Motions to Compel Discovery
`
`Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the
`Party with the Burden of Proof
`
`2 The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in part that “[a] party’s failure to
`oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein creates a presumption that the party does not
`controvert the facts set out by movant and has no evidence to offer in opposition to the motion.”
`If the deadline under Local Rule CV 7(e) exceeds the deadline for Response to Dispositive
`Motions, the deadline for Response to Dispositive Motions controls.
`
`

`

`Case 2:24-cv-00331-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 09/23/24 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 651
`
`Original Deadline New Deadline
`
`
`November 13, 2025
`
`October 23, 2025
`
`October 9, 2025
`
`October 2, 2025
`
`September 25, 2025
`
`September 11, 2025
`
`September 11, 2025
`
`August 28, 2025
`
`August 21, 2025
`
`August 7, 2025
`
`July 31, 2025
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7 (Opinion of Counsel
`Defenses)
`
`*Claim Construction Hearing – 9:00 a.m. in
`Marshall, Texas before Judge Roy Payne
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(d)
`Construction Chart)
`
`(Joint Claim
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(c)
`Construction Brief)
`
`(Reply Claim
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(b) (Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief)
`
`(Opening Claim
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(a)
`Construction Brief) and Submit Technical
`Tutorials (if any)
`
`Good cause must be shown to submit technical
`tutorials after the deadline to comply with P.R. 4-
`5(a).
`
`Deadline to Substantially Complete Document
`Production and Exchange Privilege Logs
`
`Counsel are expected to make good faith efforts to
`produce all required documents as soon as they are
`available and not wait until
`the substantial
`completion deadline.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-4 (Deadline to Complete
`Claim Construction Discovery)
`
`File Response to Amended Pleadings
`
`*File Amended Pleadings
`
`It is not necessary to seek leave of Court to amend
`pleadings prior
`to
`this deadline unless
`the
`amendment seeks to assert additional patents.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-3 (Joint Claim Construction
`Statement)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:24-cv-00331-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 09/23/24 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 652
`
`Original Deadline New Deadline
`
`
`July 10, 2025
`
`June 19, 2025
`
`
`
`October 7, 2024
`
`October 7, 2024
`
`November
`2024
`
`November
`2024
`
`September 16, 2024 September
`2024
`
`19,
`
`19,
`
`26,
`
`September 9, 2024
`
`September
`2024
`
`19,
`
`Event
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-2 (Exchange Preliminary
`Claim Constructions)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-1 (Exchange Proposed Claim
`Terms)
`
`Comply with Standing Order Regarding Subject-
`Matter Eligibility Contentions3
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4
`Contentions)
`
`(Invalidity
`
`*File Proposed Protective Order and Comply with
`Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the Discovery Order (Initial
`and Additional Disclosures)
`
`The Proposed Protective Order shall be filed as a
`separate motion with
`the caption
`indicating
`whether or not the proposed order is opposed in
`any part.
`
`*File Proposed Docket Control Order and
`Proposed Discovery Order
`
`The Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed
`Discovery Order shall be filed as separate motions
`with the caption indicating whether or not the
`proposed order is opposed in any part.
`
`
`
`
`
`Join Additional Parties
`
`September 3, 2024 Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement
`Contentions)
`
`September 3, 2024
`
`
`
`August 12, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3http://www.txed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/judgeFiles/EDTX%20Standing%20Order%20R
`e%20Subject%20Matter%20Eligibility%20Contentions%20.pdf [https://perma.cc/RQN2-YU5P]
`
`

`

`Case 2:24-cv-00331-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 09/23/24 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 653
`
`(*) indicates a deadline that cannot be changed without an acceptable showing of good cause.
`Good cause is not shown merely by indicating that the parties agree that the deadline should be
`changed.
`
` ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`
`Mediation: While certain cases may benefit from mediation, such may not be appropriate
`for every case. The Court finds that the Parties are best suited to evaluate whether mediation will
`benefit the case after the issuance of the Court’s claim construction order. Accordingly, the Court
`ORDERS the Parties to file a Joint Notice indicating whether the case should be referred for
`mediation within fourteen days of the issuance of the Court’s claim construction order. As a
`part of such Joint Notice, the Parties should indicate whether they have a mutually agreeable
`mediator for the Court to consider. If the Parties disagree about whether mediation is appropriate,
`the Parties should set forth a brief statement of their competing positions in the Joint Notice.
`
`Summary Judgment Motions, Motions to Strike Expert Testimony, and Daubert
`Motions: For each motion, the moving party shall provide the Court with two (2) hard copies of
`the completed briefing (opening motion, response, reply, and if applicable, sur-reply), excluding
`exhibits, in D-three-ring binders, appropriately tabbed. All documents shall be single-sided and
`must include the CM/ECF header. These copies shall be delivered to the Court within three (3)
`business days after briefing has completed. For expert-related motions, complete digital copies of
`the relevant expert report(s) and accompanying exhibits shall be submitted on a single flash drive
`to the Court. Complete digital copies of the expert report(s) shall be delivered to the Court no later
`than the dispositive motion deadline.
`
`Indefiniteness: In lieu of early motions for summary judgment, the parties are directed to
`include any arguments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their Markman briefing, subject to
`the local rules’ normal page limits.
`
`Lead Counsel: The Parties are directed to Local Rule CV-11(a)(1), which provides that
`“[o]n the first appearance through counsel, each party shall designate a lead attorney on the
`pleadings or otherwise.” Additionally, once designated, a party’s lead attorney may only be
`changed by the filing of a Motion to Change Lead Counsel and thereafter obtaining from the Court
`an Order granting leave to designate different lead counsel. The true lead counsel should be
`designated early and should not expect to parachute in as lead once the case has been largely
`developed.
`
`Motions for Continuance: The following will not warrant a continuance nor justify a
`failure to comply with the discovery deadline:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:24-cv-00331-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 09/23/24 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 654
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;
`
`The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day,
`unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special
`provision for the parties in the other case;
`
`The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it
`was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.
`
` Amendments to the Docket Control Order (“DCO”): Any motion to alter any date on
`the DCO shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion to amend the DCO shall
`include a proposed order that lists all of the remaining dates in one column (as above) and the
`proposed changes to each date in an additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a date
`the proposed date column should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). In other words,
`the DCO in the proposed order should be complete such that one can clearly see all the remaining
`deadlines and the changes, if any, to those deadlines, rather than needing to also refer to an earlier
`version of the DCO.
`
`Proposed DCO: The Parties’ Proposed DCO should also follow the format described
`above under “Amendments to the Docket Control Order (‘DCO’).”
`
`Joint Pretrial Order: In the contentions of the Parties included in the Joint Pretrial Order,
`the Plaintiff shall specify all allegedly infringed claims that will be asserted at trial. The Plaintiff
`shall also specify the nature of each theory of infringement, including under which subsections of
`35 U.S.C. § 271 it alleges infringement, and whether the Plaintiff alleges divided infringement or
`infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. Each Defendant shall indicate the nature of each
`theory of invalidity, including invalidity for anticipation, obviousness, subject-matter eligibility,
`written description, enablement, or any other basis for invalidity. The Defendant shall also specify
`each prior art reference or combination of references upon which the Defendant shall rely at trial,
`with respect to each theory of invalidity. Other than as set forth in the above deadlines, the
`contentions of the Parties may not be amended, supplemented, or dropped without leave of the
`Court based upon a showing of good cause. The Parties in a case which has been consolidated for
`pre-trial purposes and which is moving towards a separate trial on the merits (subsequent to pre-
`trial) shall file, as an exhibit to the parties’ Joint Pretrial Order, a list identifying all docket entries
`from the lead case that relate to the applicable member case.
`
`Trial: All parties must appear in person at trial. All non-individual (including but not
`limited to corporate) parties must appear at trial through the presence in person of a designated
`representative. Once they have appeared, any representative of a non-individual party shall not be
`replaced or substituted without express leave of Court.
`
`