throbber
Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1283
`
`United States District Court
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`SHERMAN DIVISION
`
`

`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 4:20cv180
`Judge Mazzant
`
`
`
`§§§§
`
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION and
`HTC AMERICA, INC.
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATION SCIENCES, LLC
`
`
`
`
`ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This Order shall govern proceedings in this case. The following deadlines are hereby set:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Rule 26(f) attorney conference on or before: April 14, 2020
`
`Complete initial mandatory disclosure required by this Order: April 24, 2020
`
`File joint report of attorney conference: April 28, 2020. This should follow initial
`mandatory disclosures, so a realistic proposal regarding depositions and other
`discovery can be included.
`
`The case is SET for a Rule 16 management conference on Tuesday, May 12,
`2020, at 3:00 p.m. at the Paul Brown United States Courthouse, 101 E. Pecan
`Street, Sherman, Texas 75090. Lead counsel for each party, with authority to bind
`their respective clients, and all unrepresented parties, shall be present. Continuance
`of the management conference will not be allowed absent a showing of good cause1.
`
`RULE 26(F) ATTORNEY CONFERENCE
`
`
`
`Rule 26(f) requires attorneys of record and all unrepresented parties to confer and attempt
`
`in good faith to agree on a proposed scheduling order (see Appendix 1) and to electronically file a
`joint report outlining their proposals. The conference may be by telephone.
`
`Before commencing the Rule 26(f) conference, counsel must discuss settlement options
`
`with their clients, including whether an offer or demand should be made at the Rule 26(f) attorney
`conference. Counsel should also inquire whether their clients are amenable to trial before a United
`States magistrate judge. Parties willing to consent should file the appropriate form electronically
`
`1 Before the case management conference, counsel and unrepresented parties should review the most recent
`versions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the Eastern District of Texas. The Local
`Rules are available on the Eastern District of Texas website (www.txed.uscourts.gov).
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 1284
`
`The parties must include the following matters in the joint conference report:
`
`1.
`
`A brief factual and legal synopsis of the case.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`The jurisdictional basis for this suit.
`
`A list of the correct names of the parties to this action and any anticipated additional
`or potential parties.
`
`(see form on Eastern District of Texas website) as soon as possible, so that the case can be reset
`for management conference before the magistrate judge to whom the case is assigned.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`
`6.
`
`A list of any cases related to this case pending in any state or federal court,
`identifying the case numbers and courts along with an explanation of the status of
`those cases.
`
`Confirm that initial mandatory disclosure required by Rule 26(a)(1) and this order
`has been completed.
`
`Proposed scheduling order deadlines. Appendix 1 has the standard deadlines.
`Explain any deviations from standard schedule. Now is the time to inform the
`Court of any special complexities or need for more time before the trial setting.
`The standard schedule is planned so that there is time to rule on dispositive motions
`before parties begin final trial preparation.
`
`7.
`
`Describe in accordance with Rule 26(f):
`
`(i)
`
`The subjects on which discovery may be needed, when discovery should be
`completed, and whether discovery should be conducted in phases or be
`limited to or focused on particular issues.
`
`(ii) Any issues relating to disclosure or discovery of electronically stored
`information (“ESI”), including the form or forms in which it should be
`produced (whether native or some other reasonably usable format) as well
`as any methodologies for identifying or culling the relevant and
`discoverable ESI. Any disputes regarding ESI that counsel for the parties
`are unable to resolve during conference must be identified in the report.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 1285
`
`(iii) Any agreements or disputes relating to asserting claims of privilege or
`preserving discoverable
`information,
`including electronically stored
`information and any agreements reached under Federal Rule of
`Evidence 502 (such as the potential need for a protective order and any
`procedures to which the parties might agree for handling inadvertent
`production of privileged information and other privilege waiver issues). A
`party asserting that any information is confidential should immediately
`apply to the Court for entry of a protective order.
`
`
`(iv) Any changes that should be made in the limitations on discovery imposed
`by the Rules, whether federal or local, and any other limitations that should
`be imposed, as well as
`
`
`(v) Whether any other orders should be entered by the Court pursuant to Federal
`Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) or 16(b), (c)
`
`8.
`
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`State the progress made toward settlement, and the present status of settlement
`negotiations, including whether a demand and offer has been made. If the parties
`have agreed upon a mediator, also state the name, address, and phone number of
`that mediator, and a proposed deadline for mediation. An early date is encouraged
`to reduce expenses. The Court will appoint a mediator if none is agreed upon.
`
`The identity of persons expected to be deposed.
`
`Estimated trial time and whether a jury demand has been timely made.
`
`The names of the attorneys who will appear on behalf of the parties at the
`management conference (the appearing attorney must be an attorney of record and
`have full authority to bind the client).
`
`12. Whether the parties jointly consent to trial before a magistrate judge.
`
`13.
`
`Any other matters that counsel deem appropriate for inclusion in the joint
`conference report or that deserve the special attention of the Court at the
`management conference.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 1286
`
`DISCOVERY
`
`
`Initial mandatory disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) shall be completed not later than
`
`10 days after the deadline for the Rule 26 attorney conference and shall include the following,
`in addition to information required by Rule 26(a)(1):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The correct names of the parties to the action.
`
`The name and, if known, address and telephone number of any potential parties to
`the action.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`The name and, if known, the address and telephone number of persons having
`knowledge of facts relevant to the claim or defense of any party, a brief
`characterization of their connection to the case and a fair summary of the substance
`of the information known by such person. This may be combined with the list of
`persons required under Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(i) so two lists are not needed.
`
`The authorizations described in Local Rule CV-34.
`
`A copy of all documents, electronically stored information, witness statements, and
`tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the disclosing party that are
`relevant to the claim or defense of any party. This may be combined with
`disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(ii) so duplication is avoided. In cases involving
`a disproportionate burden of disclosure of a large number of documents on one
`party, the parties may agree on prior inspection to reduce the need for copy. Parties
`are encouraged to agree upon provision of information by electronic means.
`
`
`See Local Rule CV-26(d) for meaning of “relevant to the claim or defense of any party.”
`
`A party that fails to timely disclose such information will not, unless such failure is harmless,
`be permitted to use such evidence at trial, at a hearing, or in support of a motion. A party is
`not excused from making its disclosures because it has not fully completed its investigation of the
`case. Moreover, the proportionality standard set forth in Rule 26(b)(2)(C) should be applied in
`each case when formulating a discovery control plan. To further the application of the
`proportionality standard in discovery, requests for production of ESI and related responses should
`be reasonably targeted, clear, and as specific as practicable.
`
`Early Rule 34 requests may be delivered in compliance with Rule 26(d)(2). See Fed. R.
`
`Civ. P. 26(d)(2). However, these requests are not considered served until the Rule 26(f) conference
`has occurred. All other discovery shall not commence until the Rule 26(f) conference. See Fed.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 1287
`
`R. Civ. P. 26(d), 34. Depositions may be taken, and initial mandatory disclosure shall occur,
`before the Rule 16 management conference, so that counsel are in a position to intelligently discuss
`additional required discovery, and scheduling of the case.
`
`Following the management conference, the Court will enter a scheduling order setting
`
`deadlines controlling disposition of the case. If the Court concludes that a management
`conference is not necessary after receiving the parties’ 26(f) report, it may enter a scheduling
`order and cancel the management conference.
`
`The fact that the scheduling order will have a deadline for completion of discovery is NOT
`
`an invitation, or authorization, to withhold documents or information required to be disclosed as
`part of initial mandatory disclosure, under the guise of “supplementation.” Attorneys are expected
`to review their client’s files and to conduct at least preliminary interviews of their clients and
`potential witnesses under their control, so as to fully comply with the initial mandatory disclosure
`requirements by the deadline set in this order. This will allow experts to be timely identified and
`prepared to testify, witnesses to be efficiently deposed, and any follow-up paper discovery to be
`completed by the deadline to be set for completion of discovery. The Court expects that, in most
`cases, after reading the pleadings and having a frank discussion of the issues and discovery during
`the Rule 26 attorney conference, a review of the opposing party’s initial disclosures should alert
`an attorney to any remaining information which should have been disclosed, so that such
`information can be provided before the Rule 16 management conference.
`
`
`
`DISCOVERY DISPUTES
`
`A magistrate judge is available during business hours to immediately hear discovery
`
`disputes and to enforce provisions of the rules. The hotline is an appropriate means to obtain an
`immediate ruling on whether a discovery request is relevant to the claims or defenses and on
`disputes which arise during depositions. The hotline number is (903) 590-1198. See Local Rule
`CV-26(e).
`
`
`
`CONTESTED MOTION PRACTICE
`
`Counsel and parties shall comply with Local Rules CV-7, 10, 11, and 56, in addition to the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Local Rule CV-7 requires you to attach affidavits and other
`supporting documents to the motion or response. Labeled tabs on the attachments to the courtesy
`copy will make it easier to find them.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 1288
`
`If a document filed electronically exceeds twenty (20) pages in length, including
`
`attachments, a paper copy of the filed document must be sent contemporaneously to Judge
`Mazzant's chambers in Sherman.
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(b), highlight in the courtesy copy, the portions of the
`
`affidavits or other supporting documents which are cited in your motion or response.
`
`Any reply or sur-reply must be filed in accordance with Local Rule CV-6 and Local Rule
`
`CV-7(f). The parties are reminded that “[t]he court need not wait for the reply or sur-reply before
`ruling on the motion.” Local Rule CV-7(f) (emphasis added).
`
`
`
`
`SAFEGUARDING PERSONAL INFORMATION
`
`
`The Judicial Conference of the United States has implemented policies to protect sensitive
`private information about parties, witnesses, and others involved in a civil, criminal, or bankruptcy
`case. To that end, all documents filed with the Court and made available to the public, whether
`electronically or on paper, should limit certain information as follows:
`
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`for Social Security numbers, use only the last four digits;
`for financial account numbers, use only the last four digits;
`for names of minor children, use only their initials;
`for dates of birth, use only the year; and
`(in criminal cases) for home addresses, use only the city and state.
`
`
`If such information is elicited during testimony or other court proceedings, it will become
`
`available to the public when the official transcript is filed at the courthouse unless, and until, it is
`redacted. The better practice is for you to avoid introducing this information into the record in the
`first place. Please take this into account when questioning witnesses or making other statements in
`court.
`
`
`
`FAILURE TO SERVE
`
`Any defendant who has not been served with the summons and complaint within 90 days
`
`after the filing of the complaint shall be dismissed, without further notice, unless prior to such
`time the party on whose behalf such service is required shows good cause why service has not
`been made. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 1289
`
`FICTITIOUS PARTIES
`
`The name of every party shall be set out in the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). The
`
`use of fictitious names is disfavored by federal courts. Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 112 F.3d.
`869 (7th Cir. 1997). It is hereby ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED as to all fictitious
`parties. Dismissal is without prejudice to the right of any party to take advantage of the provisions
`of Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c).
`
`
`SETTLEMENT
`
`Plaintiff’s counsel shall immediately notify the Court upon settlement.
`
`
`
`
`COMPLIANCE
`
`Attorneys and pro se litigants who appear in this court must comply with the deadlines set
`
`forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the Eastern District of Texas and
`this order. A party is not excused from the requirements of a Rule or scheduling order by
`virtue of the fact that dispositive motions are pending, the party has not completed its
`investigation, the party challenges the sufficiency of the opposing party’s disclosure, or
`because another party has failed to comply with this order or the rules.
`
`Failure to comply with relevant provisions of the Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, or this order may result in the exclusion of evidence at trial, the imposition of sanctions
`by the Court, or both. Counsel are reminded of Local Rule AT-3, particularly AT-3(I) & (J).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 1290
`
`Appendix 1
`
`PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES
`
`The following actions shall be completed by the date indicated.1 (The times indicated are
`
`the standard for most cases. Counsel should be prepared to explain the need for requested changes)
`
`____________________
`(1 week after mgmt conf.)
`
`____________________
`(6 weeks after mgmt conf.)
`
`
`____________________
`six weeks prior to mediation ddl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Deadline for motions to transfer
`
`Deadline to add parties
`
`
`
`Mediation must occur by this date.
`Deadline by which the parties shall notify the Court of the
`name, address, and telephone number of the agreed-upon
`mediator, or request that the Court select a mediator, if they
`are unable to agree on one.
`
`
`
`______________ ______
`(10 weeks after mgmt. conf.)
`
`
`
`_________________ ___
`(12 weeks after mgmt conf.)
`
`
`______________ ______
`(14 weeks after mgmt. conf.)
`
`
`
`____________________
`(14 weeks after mgmt conf.)
`
` 6
`
`Disclosure of expert testimony pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
`26(a)(2) and Local Rule CV-26(b) on issues for which the
`party bears the burden of proof.
`
`Deadline for Plaintiff to file amended pleadings
`(A motion for leave to amend is required.)
`
`Disclosure of expert testimony pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
`26(a)(2) and Local Rule CV-26(b) on issues for which the
`party does not bear the burden of proof.
`
`Deadline for Defendant’s final amended pleadings
`(A motion for leave to amend is required.)
`
`Deadline to object to any other party’s expert witnesses.
`Objection shall be made as a motion to strike or limit
`expert testimony and shall be accompanied by a copy
`of the expert’s report in order to provide the court with
`all the information necessary to make a ruling on any
`objection
`
`Deadline for motions to dismiss, motions for summary
`judgment, or other dispositive motions.
`
` weeks after disclosure
`of an expert is made
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________
`
`(14 weeks after mgmt conf.
`but no later than 110 days prior
`
`1If a deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday as defined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, the effective date is the
`first federal court business day following the deadline imposed.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 1291
`
`
`
`
`
`to deadline for submission of
`Joint Final Pretrial Order)
`
`
`
`_________________ ___
`(24 weeks after mgmt conf.)
`
`
`
`_____________________
`(6 weeks before final pretrial conf.)
`
`
`Counsel and unrepresented parties are each responsible for
`
`____________________
`(6 weeks before final pretrial conf.) contacting opposing counsel and unrepresented parties to
`determine how they will prepare the Joint Final Pretrial
`Order and Joint Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict
`Form (or Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
`in non-jury cases).
`
`All discovery shall be commenced in time to be completed
`by this date.
`
`Notice of intent to offer certified records
`
`
`Video Deposition Designation due. Each party who
`
`____________ ________
`(5 weeks before final pretrial conf.) proposes to offer a deposition by video shall serve on all
`other parties a disclosure identifying the line and page
`numbers to be offered. All other parties will have seven
`calendar days to serve a response with any objections and
`requesting cross examination line and page
`numbers to be included. Counsel must consult on any
`objections and only those which can not be resolved shall
`be presented to the court. The party who filed the initial
`Video Deposition Designation is responsible for
`preparation of the final edited video in accordance with all
`parties designations and the court’s rulings on objections.
`
`
`Motions in limine due
`
`______ ______________
`(30 days before final pretrial conf.) File Joint Final Pretrial Order (See www.txed.uscourts.gov).
`
`_ _
`
`
`
`Response to motions in limine due2
`
`
`2This is not an invitation or requirement to file written responses. Most motions in limine can be decided without a
`written response. But, if there is particularly difficult or novel issue, the Court needs some time to review the
`matter. To save time and space respond only to items objected to. All others will be considered to be agreed.
`Opposing counsel shall confer in an attempt to resolve any dispute over the motions in limine within five calendar
`days of the filing of any response. The parties shall notify the court of all the issues which are resolved.
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00180-ALM Document 37 Filed 03/24/20 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 1292
`
`(2 weeks before final pretrial conf.) File objections to witnesses, deposition extracts, and
`exhibits, listed in pre-trial order.3 (This does not extend
`deadline to object to expert witnesses.)
`File Proposed Jury Instructions/Form of Verdict (or
`Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law)
`
`
`Date will be set by Court. If numerous objections are filed the court may set a
`Usually within 10 days prior
`hearing to consider all pending motions and objections.
`to final pretrial conf.
`
`February 26, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`Final Pretrial Conference at 9:00 a.m. at the Paul Brown
`United States Courthouse located at 101 East Pecan Street in
`Sherman, Texas. All cases on the Court’s Final Pretrial
`Conference docket for this day have been set at 9:00 a.m.
`However, prior to the Final Pretrial Conference date, the
`Court will set a specific time between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00
`p.m. for each case, depending on which cases remain on the
`Court’s docket.
`
` 10:00 a.m. Jury selection and trial (or bench trial) at the Paul
`Brown United States Courthouse located at 101 East Pecan
`Street in Sherman, Texas. Cases that remain for trial
`following the Court’s Pretrial docket will be tried between
`April 5, 2021, and April 30, 2021. A specific trial date in
`this time frame will be selected at the Final Pretrial
`Conference.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to be determined
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3Within five calendar days after the filing of any objections, opposing counsel shall confer to determine whether
`objections can be resolved without a court ruling. The parties shall notify the court of all issues which are resolved.
`The court needs a copy of the exhibit or the pertinent deposition pages to rule on the objection.
`
`
`
`10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket