throbber

`KT IMAGING USA, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 4:20-cv-333
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`SHERMAN DIVISION
`
`
`DYNABOOK, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff KT Imaging USA, LLC (“KTI” or “Plaintiff”), by way of this Complaint against
`
`Defendant Dynabook, Inc. (“Dynabook” or “Defendant”), alleges as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff KT Imaging USA, LLC is a limited liability company organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Texas, having its principal place of business at 106 E 6th Street, Suite
`
`900, Austin, TX 78701.
`
`2.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Dynabook, Inc. is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of Japan, with its principal place of business at NBF Toyosu Garden Front
`
`Bldg., Toyosu 5-6-15, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This is an action under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq., for
`
`infringement by Dynabook of claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,876,544; U.S. Patent No. 7,196,322;
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,004,602; and U.S. Patent No. 8,314,481 (collectively “the Patents-in-Suit”).
`
`4.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 2 of 11 PageID #: 2
`
`5.
`
`Dynabook is subject to personal jurisdiction of this Court because, inter alia, on
`
`information and belief, (i) Dynabook has committed and continues to commit acts of patent
`
`infringement in the State of Texas, including by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or
`
`importing the accused products into Texas; (ii) Dynabook purposefully supplies and directs the
`
`accused products for storage, warehousing, and sales by distributors and resellers in the State of
`
`Texas; and (iii) Dynabook delivers its products into the stream of commerce with the expectation
`
`that they will be purchased by consumers in the State of Texas. In addition, or in the alternative,
`
`this Court has personal jurisdiction over Dynabook pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)(2).
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper as to Dynabook in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c) because, inter
`
`alia, Dynabook is a foreign corporation.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`7.
`
`On April 5, 2005, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and lawfully issued
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,876,544 (“the ’544 Patent”), entitled “Image Sensor Module and Method for
`
`Manufacturing the Same.”
`
`8.
`
`On March 27, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and lawfully
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 7,196,322 (“the ’322 Patent”), entitled “Image Sensor Package.”
`
`9.
`
`On August 23, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and lawfully
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 8,004,602 (“the ’602 Patent”), entitled “Image Sensor Structure And
`
`Integrated Lens Module Thereof.”
`
`10.
`
`On November 20, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and lawfully
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 8,314,481 (“the ’481 Patent”), entitled “Substrate Structure for an Image
`
`Sensor Package and Method for Manufacturing the Same.”
`
`11.
`
`KTI is the assignee and owner of the right, title, and interest in and to the Patents-in-Suit,
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: 3
`
`including the right to assert all causes of action arising under said patents and the right to any
`
`remedies for infringement of them.
`
`12.
`
`By letter dated June 20, 2019, KTI notified Dynabook of the existence of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,876,544; U.S. Patent No. 7,196,322; and U.S. Patent No. 8,004,602, and of infringement thereof
`
`by Dynabook. KTI’s June 20, 2019 letter invited Dynabook to hold a licensing discussion with
`
`KTI.
`
`13.
`
`As of the date of this Complaint, KTI has not received any response from Dynabook to its
`
`letter.
`
`14.
`
`Dynabook has had notice of the ’481 Patent at least as of the time of filing of this
`
`Complaint.
`
`15.
`
`Dynabook has infringed and continues to infringe the Patents-in-Suit by making, using,
`
`selling, or offering for sale in the United States, or importing into the United States, tablets and
`
`laptops with front and/or rear image sensor technology claimed in the Patents-in-suit. Attachment
`
`A to this Complaint provides a non-exhaustive listing of Accused Products. Attachment B to this
`
`Complaint provides a listing of Exhibits comprising exemplary teardown images for certain
`
`Accused Products.
`
`COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’544 PATENT BY DYNABOOK
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has infringed the ’544 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`§ 271(a), literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, selling
`
`in the United States or importing into the United States the Accused Products and all other products
`
`with substantially similar imaging sensors.
`
`18.
`
`For example, on information and belief, Dynabook has infringed and continues to infringe
`
`at least claim 1 of the ’544 Patent by including an image sensor module to be mounted to a printed
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 4 of 11 PageID #: 4
`
`circuit board in the Encore 2 model. See Ex. 1 (Toshiba Encore 2 rear facing image sensor). The
`
`front facing image sensor module in the Accused Products comprises a substrate having an upper
`
`surface formed with a plurality of first connection points and a lower surface formed with a
`
`plurality of second connection points, which is electrically connected to the printed circuit board.
`
`See Exs. 2-3 (Toshiba Encore 2 rear facing image sensor). The image sensor module further
`
`comprises a photosensitive chip mounted to the upper surface of the substrate. See Ex. 2 (Toshiba
`
`Encore 2 rear facing image sensor). The image sensor module further comprises a plurality of
`
`wires for electrically connecting the photosensitive chip to the first connection points on the upper
`
`surface of the substrate. See Ex. 3 (Toshiba Encore 2 rear facing image sensor). The image sensor
`
`module further comprises a frame layer mounted to the upper surface of the substrate to surround
`
`the photosensitive chip, an inner edge of the frame layer being formed with an internal thread from
`
`top to bottom, and a transparent layer being fixed by the frame layer such that the photosensitive
`
`chip may receive optical signals passing through the transparent layer. See Exs. 1 and 4 (Toshiba
`
`Encore 2 rear facing image sensor). The image sensor module further comprises a lens barrel
`
`formed with a chamber at a center thereof and an external thread at an outer edge thereof, the
`
`external thread being screwed to the internal thread of the frame layer, wherein the lens barrel has
`
`a through hole and an aspheric lens from top to bottom. See Ex. 1 (Toshiba Encore 2 rear facing
`
`image sensor).
`
`19.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has induced infringement of the ’544 Patent pursuant
`
`to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively and knowingly inducing, directing, causing, and encouraging
`
`others, including, but not limited to, its partners, resellers, distributers, customers, and end users,
`
`to make, use, sell, and/or offer to sell in the United States, and/or import into the United States,
`
`the Accused Products by, among other things, providing the accused products and incorporated
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: 5
`
`image sensor technology, specifications, instructions, manuals, advertisements, marketing
`
`materials, and technical assistance relating to the installation, set up, use, operation, and
`
`maintenance of said products.
`
`20.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has committed the foregoing infringing activities
`
`without a license.
`
`21.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook knew the ’544 Patent existed and knew of exemplary
`
`infringing Dynabook products while committing the foregoing infringing acts thereby willfully,
`
`wantonly and deliberately infringing the ’544 Patent.
`
`COUNT II: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’322 PATENT BY DYNABOOK
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has infringed the ’322 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`§ 271(a), literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, selling
`
`in the United States or importing into the United States the Accused Products and all other products
`
`with substantially similar imaging sensors.
`
`24.
`
`For example, on information and belief, Dynabook has infringed and continues to infringe
`
`at least claim 1 of the ’322 Patent by including an image sensor module in the Excite 7.7 product.
`
`See Ex. 7 (Toshiba Excite 7.7 Android 4.0 image sensor). The image sensor module in the Accused
`
`Products comprises a substrate having an upper surface, and a lower surface on which second
`
`electrodes are formed, and a frame layer arranged on the upper surface of the substrate, a cavity
`
`formed between the frame layer and substrate, and a plurality of first electrodes are formed on the
`
`frame layer. See Exs. 8-9 (Toshiba Excite 7.7 Android 4.0 image sensor). The image sensor
`
`module in the Accused Products further comprises a photosensitive chip mounted on the upper
`
`surface of the substrate and located within the cavity, and electrically connected to the first
`
`electrodes of the frame layer. See Exs. 7, 9-10 (Toshiba Excite 7.7 Android 4.0 image sensor).
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 6 of 11 PageID #: 6
`
`The image sensor module in the Accused Products further comprises a lens holder having an upper
`
`end face, a lower end face, and an opening penetrating through the lens holder from the upper end
`
`face to the lower end face, the upper end of the opening formed with an internal thread and the
`
`lower end of the opening formed with a breach, so that the internal diameter of the upper end of
`
`the opening is smaller than the lower end of the opening, the lens holder adhered on the upper
`
`surface of the substrate by glue, wherein, the frame layer is located within the breach of the lens
`
`holder. See Exs. 7 and 9 (Toshiba Excite 7.7 Android 4.0 image sensor). The image sensor module
`
`of the Accused Product further comprises a lens barrel having an upper end face, a lower end face,
`
`and an external thread screwed to the internal thread of the lens holder. See Exs. 1 and 11 (Toshiba
`
`Excite 7.7 Android 4.0 image sensor).
`
`25.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has induced infringement of the ’322 Patent pursuant
`
`to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively and knowingly inducing, directing, causing, and encouraging
`
`others, including, but not limited to, its partners, resellers, distributers, customers, and end users,
`
`to make, use, sell, and/or offer to sell in the United States, and/or import into the United States,
`
`the Accused Products by, among other things, providing the accused products and incorporated
`
`image sensor technology, specifications, instructions, manuals, advertisements, marketing
`
`materials, and technical assistance relating to the installation, set up, use, operation, and
`
`maintenance of said products.
`
`26.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has committed the foregoing infringing activities
`
`without a license.
`
`27.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook knew the ’322 Patent existed and knew of exemplary
`
`infringing Dynabook products while committing the foregoing infringing acts while committing
`
`the foregoing infringing acts, thereby willfully, wantonly and deliberately infringing the ’322
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: 7
`
`Patent.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`COUNT III: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’602 PATENT BY DYNABOOK
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has infringed the ’602 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(a), literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, selling
`
`in the United States, or importing into the United States the Accused Products and all other
`
`products with substantially similar imaging sensors.
`
`30.
`
`For example, on information and belief, Dynabook has infringed and continues to infringe
`
`at least claim 1 of the ’602 Patent by including an image sensor structure with an integrated lens
`
`module in the Accused Products. See Ex. 13 (Dynabook Tecra C40 image sensor). The image
`
`sensor structure in the Accused Products comprises a chip having a plurality of light-sensing
`
`elements arranged on a light sensing area of a first surface of the chip, a plurality of first conducting
`
`pads arranged around the light-sensing area and electrically connected to the light-sensing
`
`elements, and at least one conducting channel passing through the chip and electrically connected
`
`to the first conducting pads at one end as well as extending along with a second surface of the chip.
`
`See Exs. 13-15 (Dynabook Tecra C40 image sensor). The image sensor structure in the Accused
`
`Products comprises a lens module comprising a holder having a through hole and a contact surface
`
`on a bottom of the holder, wherein the contact surface is combined with the first surface, and at
`
`least one lens completely embedded inside the through hole and integrated with the holder. See
`
`Ex. 13 (Dynabook Tecra C40 image sensor).
`
`31.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has induced infringement of the ’602 Patent pursuant
`
`to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively and knowingly inducing, directing, causing, and encouraging
`
`others, including, but not limited to, its partners, resellers, distributers, customers, and end users,
`
`to make, use, sell, and/or offer to sell in the United States, and/or import into the United States,
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 8 of 11 PageID #: 8
`
`the Accused Products by, among other things, providing the accused products and incorporated
`
`image sensor technology, specifications, instructions, manuals, advertisements, marketing
`
`materials, and technical assistance relating to the installation, set up, use, operation, and
`
`maintenance of said products.
`
`32.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has committed the foregoing infringing activities
`
`without a license.
`
`33.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook knew the ’602 Patent existed and knew of exemplary
`
`infringing Dynabook products while committing the foregoing infringing acts while committing
`
`the foregoing infringing acts, thereby willfully, wantonly and deliberately infringing the ’602
`
`Patent.
`
`COUNT IV: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’481 PATENT BY DYNABOOK
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has infringed the ’481 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`§ 271(a), literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, selling
`
`in the United States, or importing into the United States the Accused Products and all other
`
`products with substantially similar imaging sensors.
`
`36.
`
`For example, on information and belief, Dynabook has infringed and continues to infringe
`
`at least claim 1 of the ’481 Patent by including a substrate structure for an image sensor package
`
`in the Tecra C40 product. See Ex. 13 (Dynabook Tecra C40 image sensor). The substrate structure
`
`in the Accused Products comprises a bottom base having an upper surface formed with a plurality
`
`of first electrodes, and a lower surface formed with a plurality of second electrodes, wherein an
`
`insulation layer is coated between first electrodes and in direct surface contact with the upper
`
`surface of the bottom base. See Ex. 13 (Dynabook Tecra C40 image sensor). The substrate
`
`structure in the Accused Products comprises a frame layer arranged on and in direct surface contact
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: 9
`
`with the first electrodes and the insulation layer to form a cavity together with the bottom base,
`
`wherein the insulation layer is interposed between the bottom base and the frame layer. See Ex.
`
`13 (Dynabook Tecra C40 image sensor).
`
`37.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has induced infringement of the ’481 Patent pursuant
`
`to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively and knowingly inducing, directing, causing, and encouraging
`
`others, including, but not limited to, its partners, resellers, distributers, customers, and end users,
`
`to make, use, sell, and/or offer to sell in the United States, and/or import into the United States,
`
`the Accused Products by, among other things, providing the accused products and incorporated
`
`image sensor technology, specifications, instructions, manuals, advertisements, marketing
`
`materials, and technical assistance relating to the installation, set up, use, operation, and
`
`maintenance of said products.
`
`38.
`
`On information and belief, Dynabook has committed the foregoing infringing activities
`
`without a license.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, KTI prays for judgment in its favor against Dynabook for the following
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`relief:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Entry of judgment in favor of KTI against Dynabook on all counts;
`
`Entry of judgment that Dynabook has infringed the Patent-in-Suit;
`
`Entry of judgment that Dynabook’s infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,876,544,
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,196,322, and U.S. Patent No. 8,004,602 has been willful;
`
`D.
`
`An order permanently enjoining Dynabook from infringing the Patent-in-Suit;
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: 10
`
`E.
`
`Award of compensatory damages adequate to compensate KTI for Dynabook’s
`
`infringement of the Patent-in-Suit, in no event less than a reasonable royalty trebled as provided
`
`by 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`F.
`
`Award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses against Dynabook pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 285;
`
`G.
`
`H.
`
`I.
`
`KTI’s costs;
`
`Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on KTI’s award; and
`
`All such other and further relief as the Court deems just or equitable.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Fed. R. Civ. Proc., Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury in this
`
`action of all claims so triable.
`
`Dated: April 20, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Stafford Davis
`Stafford Davis
`State Bar No. 24054605
`sdavis@stafforddavisfirm.com
`Catherine Bartles
`State Bar No. 24104849
`cbartles@stafforddavisfirm.com
`THE STAFFORD DAVIS FIRM, PC
`815 South Broadway
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: (903) 593-7000
`Fax: (903) 705-7369
`
`Dmitry Kheyfits
`dkheyfits@kblit.com
`KHEYFITS BELENKY LLP
`7500 Rialto Boulevard, Suite 250
`Austin, TX 78735
`Tel: 737-228-1838
`Fax: 737-228-1843
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-00333-ALM Document 1 Filed 04/20/20 Page 11 of 11 PageID #: 11
`
`Brandon G. Moore
`KHEYFITS BELENKY LLP
`7500 Rialto Boulevard, Bldg. 1
`Suite 250
`Austin, TX 78735
`Tel: 737-228-1838
`Fax: 737-228-1843
`
`Andrey Belenky
`abelenky@kblit.com
`KHEYFITS BELENKY LLP
`1140 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: 212-203-5399
`Fax: 212-203-5399
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`KT Imaging USA, LLC
`
`
`
`11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket