`Case 6:12-cv-OO855-RWS Document 722 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 52122
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`§ §
`
`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-CV~00855-
`§ RWS
`§
`'
`§
`
`§ §
`
`§ §
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`VIRNETX INC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`APPLE INC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`In answering these questions, you are to follow all ofthe instructions provided
`by the Court during the Court’s jury instructions.
`.Your answers to each question
`must be unanimous.
`
`As used herein, “’ 135 patent” means US. Patent No. 6,5 02,1 35 ; “’ 151 patent”
`means US. Patent NO. 7,490,151; “’504 patent” means U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504;
`“’21 1 patent” means _U.S. Patent No. 7,921,21 1.
`
`1. Did VirnetX prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple’s
`redesigned version of its VPN on Demand feature infringes the following
`claims ofVirnetX’s ’135 & ’151 patents?
`
`Answer “Yes”'or “No” for each Claim.
`
`’135 Patent
`
`I
`
`’151 Patent
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 7
`
`\IE 3
`yes
`
`Claim 13
`
`ES
`
`'
`
`CONTINUE ON TO NEXTPAGE
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00855-RWS Document 722 Filed 04/12/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 52123
`Case 6:12-cv-00855-RWS Document 722 filed 04/12/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 52123
`
`2. Did VimetX prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple’s
`redesigned version of the FaceTime feature infringes the following claims of
`VirnetX’s ’504 & ’211 patents?
`
`‘ Answer “Yes” or “No” for each Claim.
`
`’504 Patent
`
`‘
`
`’21 1 Patent
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 2
`Claim 5
`
`Claim 27
`
`\IES
`5“:5
`1‘:
`
`#55
`
`Claim 36
`Claim 47
`. Claim 51
`
`\IES
`\l 15,3
`\IES
`
`Answer Question 3 only ifyou answered “yes ”for any ofQuestions I or 2 above.
`Otherwise, do not answer this question.
`
`3. What royalty do you find, by apreponderance of the evidence, would fairly
`and reasonably compensate VirnetX for any infringement that you have
`found?
`
`55052 5L: 75,253 m
`
`Page 2 of3
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00855-RWS Document 722 Filed 04/12/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 52124
`_ Case 6:12-cv-00855-RWS Document 722 Filed 04/12/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 52124
`
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to
`
`ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The jury foreperson
`should then sign and date the verdict form in the spaces below and notify the Court
`Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The jury foreperson should retain
`possession of the verdict form and bring it when the jury is brought back into the
`courtroom.
`‘
`
`Page 3 of3
`
`