throbber

`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1
`
`
`
`
` CAUSE NO. _________
`
`
`
`
`CROWN DIST RIB UTING
`LLC,
`
` PLAINTI FF,
`
`V.
`
`ICE S UPPZ, LL C,
`NAL PDOG LLC, AND JOSH
`BECKER,
`
` DEFE NDANTS.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`DALLAS DIVISION
`












`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
` JURY DEMAND
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, Crown Distributing LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Crown”) files this Complaint against Ice
`
`Suppz, LLC (“Ice Suppz”), Nalpdog LLC (“Nalpdog”), and Josh Becker (together, “Defendants”).
`
`I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
`
`
`
`Crown is a Dallas-based manufacturer and distributor of hemp-derivative goods.
`
`Crown manufactures and distributes its goods from its facilities in Dallas, Texas.
`
`
`
`Hemp, or Cannabis sativa L., is a plant grown for industrial and commercial
`
`purposes that has been in use for thousands of years.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 1
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 2 of 14 PageID 2Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 2 of 14 PageID 2
`
`
`
`THE AGRICULTURE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2018, more commonly known as the
`
`2018 Farm Bill, established hemp as an agricultural commodity and removed hemp as a scheduled
`
`substance from the federal CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT. Governor Greg Abbott followed suit,
`
`signing Texas House Bill 1325 into law on June 10, 2019, establishing a hemp program in Texas.
`
`Crown distributes its hemp-derivative goods across the United States and abroad.
`
`To make its hemp-derivative goods, Crown purchases raw hemp material, known
`
`
`
`
`
`as biomass.
`
`
`
`
`
`The biomass is then processed for inclusion into Crown’s finished goods.
`
`Manufacturers and distributors often enter into agreements with brokers or
`
`
`
`brokerage firms, companies that locate raw hemp material for purchase by the buyer that hires
`
`them.
`
`
`
`Buyers generally provide quality parameters to the broker, including specified
`
`cannabidiol (“CBD”) content.
`
`
`
`CBD is one of over 120 phytocannabinoids, or chemicals, occurring naturally in
`
`the hemp plant.
`
`
`
`This action arises out of Crown’s reliance on Defendants’ multiple representations
`
`that Defendant were capable of locating and providing the desired biomass material to Crown.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 2
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 3 of 14 PageID 3Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 3 of 14 PageID 3
`
`Based on Defendants’ representations, Crown remitted $200,000.00 for the purchase of the
`
`biomass.
`
`
`
`Despite Defendants’ multiple representations to Crown that material in the amount
`
`and quality that Crown desired could be procured, Defendants provided material that did not meet
`
`the express quality conditions provided by Crown.
`
`
`
`Upon shipment to Crown’s Dallas facility, Crown rejected the nonconforming
`
`material and requested that it be immediately removed from its facilities.
`
`
`
`Subsequently, Defendants attempted to cure their breach by providing substitute
`
`material. The substitute material was also deficient. Crown rejected the substitute material and
`
`requested that it immediately be removed from its facilities.
`
`
`
`Despite multiple demands for return of the $200,000.00 Crown remitted,
`
`Defendants have retained Crown’s funds, have not provided the desired hemp plant material, and
`
`have failed to remove the rejected materials from Crown’s facility. Crown has incurred ongoing
`
`fumigation and storage costs for the deficient material.
`
`II. PARTIES
`
` Crown Distributing LLC is a Texas limited liability company duly organized in the
`
`State of Texas. Crown Distributing’s principal place of business is located at 2861 Congressman
`
`Lane, Dallas, Texas 75220. Crown Distributing LLC’s sole member is Mansoor Alibhai.
`
`Mr. Alibhai is a citizen of Texas.
`
` Defendant Ice Suppz, LLC is a Nevada limited liability company duly organized in
`
`the State of Nevada. Ice Suppz, LLC’s principal place of business is located at 2831 St. Rose
`
`Parkway Suite 200-400, Henderson, Nevada 89052. It may be served by and through its registered
`
`agent, LegalCorp Solutions, LLC, at 2831 St. Rose Parkway Suite 200-400, Henderson, Nevada
`
`89052.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 3
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 4 of 14 PageID 4Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 4 of 14 PageID 4
`
` Upon information and belief, Defendant Ice Suppz, LLC’s sole member is
`
`Josh Becker, who is a resident and citizen of Oregon, domiciled and residing in Oregon at 16285
`
`SW 85th Avenue, Suite 107, Portland, Oregon 97224-5421.
`
` Defendant Nalpdog LLC is a Nevada limited liability company duly organized in
`
`the State of Nevada. Nalpdog’s principal place of business is located at 2831 St Rose Parkway
`
`Suite 200-400, Henderson, Nevada 89052, and it may be served by and through its registered agent,
`
`LegalCorp Solutions, LLC, at 2831 St Rose Parkway Suite 200-400, Henderson, Nevada 89052.
`
` Upon information and belief, Defendant Nalpdog LLC’s sole member is Ice Suppz,
`
`LLC, a Nevada limited liability company duly organized in the State of Nevada, located at
`
`5320 Cameron Street, No. 7, Las Vegas, Nevada 89118.
`
` Upon information and belief, Defendant Josh Becker is a citizen of Oregon,
`
`domiciled and residing in Oregon at 16285 SW 85th Avenue, Suite 107, Portland, Oregon 97224-
`
`5421. Defendant Josh Becker may be served at this listed Oregon address.
`
`III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
` This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the
`
`parties are diverse and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
`
` This Court has personal jurisdiction over the parties because the acts and omissions
`
`of Defendants subject to this Complaint all occurred in Texas or were directed toward Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant Ice Suppz offers its brokerage and supplier services to Texas residents.
`
`Defendant Josh Becker offers his brokerage services to Texas residents.
`
`Defendants Nalpdog and Josh Becker solicited the business of Crown Distributing
`
`LLC, located in Dallas, Texas, and Defendant Josh Becker entered into an oral contract with
`
`Plaintiff for the sale of tens of thousands of pounds of hemp material to Texas.
`
`
`
`Becker entered into multiple previous contracts with Plaintiff for the sale of hemp
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 4
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 5 of 14 PageID 5Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 5 of 14 PageID 5
`
`product to Plaintiff in Texas. And Becker sent numerous large bags of sample material to Crown
`
`in Texas to induce Crown into the contract at issue
`
`
`
`For a period of over six months, Defendants negotiated and communicated with
`
`Crown regarding the matters complained of herein.
`
`
`
`Defendants shipped or caused to be shipped several truckloads of raw hemp
`
`material into Texas on multiple occasions.
`
`
`
`These shipments occurred over a period of several months and were based on
`
`numerous repeated negotiations regarding the quality of hemp Defendants delivered to Texas, and
`
`all communications were directed to Plaintiff in Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants offer for sale and sell hemp materials to Texas residents.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), as a substantial
`
`part of the events giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in Dallas, Texas.
`
`IV. FACTS
`
`
`
`
`
`Crown is a Dallas-based manufacturer and distributor of hemp-derivative goods.
`
`Defendant Josh Becker is an individual that brokers transactions for sourcing and
`
`purchasing of raw hemp plant material.
`
`
`
`Defendant Ice Suppz is a brokerage firm/supplier that offers and provides services
`
`for sourcing raw hemp plant material.
`
`
`
`Defendant Nalpdog is an entity that offers and provides services for sourcing and
`
`providing raw hemp plant material.
`
`
`
`Crown hired Josh Becker; however, unbeknownst to Crown at the time, Josh
`
`Becker is a member of, owns, and/or is affiliated with multiple entities, such as Ice Suppz and
`
`Nalpdog. In determining to contract with Mr. Becker, Mr. Becker represented he was capable of
`
`brokering the transaction and providing the desired material in the amount and quantity that Crown
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 5
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 6 of 14 PageID 6Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 6 of 14 PageID 6
`
`desired.
`
`
`
` Mr. Becker represented to Zain Meghani, the operations manager of Crown, that
`
`he was skilled in locating quality biomass and that he could broker a transaction for the purchase
`
`of hemp material for Crown.
`
` Mr. Meghani conveyed quality parameters for the hemp material to Mr. Becker,
`
`including that the plant material be shucked, be devoid of stalks and stems, and contain 8.5 percent
`
`(8.5%) cannabidiol (“CBD”) content for the majority of the hemp plant material and 4.5 percent
`
`(4.5%) CBD content for the remainder of the hemp plant material.
`
`
`
`In May of 2020, Mr. Becker represented that he already knew of hemp material
`
`available for purchase that would meet Crown’s needs, and on May 11, 2020, Defendant Nalpdog
`
`sent Crown an invoice representing the same.
`
`
`
`Interestingly, though the invoice for the hemp plant material was issued from
`
`Nalpdog, Mr. Becker demanded that the wire funds be remitted to Ice Suppz, a completely separate
`
`entity. In reliance on Mr. Becker’s representations, and pursuant to the invoice drafted by Nalpdog,
`
`Crown committed to purchasing 38,000 pounds of hemp biomass with a CBD content of 8.5% and
`
`12,000 pounds of hemp biomass with a CBD content of 4.5% from a source located by Ice Suppz.
`
`
`
`Crown and Mr. Becker had already entered into an oral contract for the purchase of
`
`hemp material and Crown relied on Mr. Becker’s representation that the hemp material sourced
`
`from Ice Suppz would meet the quality parameters of the invoice drafted by Nalpdog.
`
` Mr. Becker represented to Mr. Meghani that the source from which the hemp
`
`biomass would be purchased was Defendant Ice Suppz.
`
`
`
`On May 12, 2020, Crown sent $200,000.00 by wire payment directly to Ice Suppz,
`
`the entity from which Mr. Becker purportedly sourced the material.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 6
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 7 of 14 PageID 7Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 7 of 14 PageID 7
`
`
`
`On or around May 18 and May 19, 2020, two trucks delivered approximately
`
`25,000 pounds of hemp material to Crown’s Dallas facilities. The material was inferior and did
`
`not meet the quality parameters relayed by Mr. Becker.
`
`
`
`After
`
`inspecting
`
`the nonconforming goods, Crown
`
`immediately rejected
`
`acceptance, requested that Ice Suppz pick up the nonconforming goods, and notified Ice Suppz
`
`that the material was unacceptable and that it had rejected the goods.
`
`
`
`In response to Crown’s rejection of the biomass, material, Josh Becker admitted via
`
`text message,“[i]t’s wrong. My people f****ed up.”
`
` Mr. Becker and Ice Suppz assured Crown they would rectify the issue by causing
`
`compliant replacement material to be sent to Crown.
`
`
`
`Relying on representations made by Mr. Becker and Ice Suppz that acceptable
`
`substitute material would be provided, Crown patiently attempted to work with Mr. Becker and
`
`Ice Suppz for several months in order to receive the desired substitute hemp material.
`
`
`
`Despite multiple representations that Mr. Becker and/or Ice Suppz could procure
`
`the desired material and provide substituted conforming goods, Mr. Becker and Ice Suppz failed
`
`to provide the material. On or around June 9, 2020, Crown began making demands to Defendants
`
`for the return of its $200,000.00 and pickup of the approximate 25,000 pounds of nonconforming
`
`goods from Crown’s facility, as it neither had acceptable substitute material nor its funds.
`
`
`
`In lieu of rectifying the situation, multiple excuses were offered, including that the
`
`purported farmer/supplier of the biomass was refusing to provide a refund of Crown’s money and
`
`that Ice Suppz’s processing machine broke down. In July of 2020, Ice Suppz noted that it
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 7
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 8 of 14 PageID 8Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 8 of 14 PageID 8
`
`“promise[s] [it] ha[s] a resolution,” and in September of 2020, Ice Suppz stated that it would be
`
`“shipping [the material] … [and] shooting [for] sometime next week. But for sure it’s happening.”
`
`
`
`On or around October 5, 2020, Mr. Becker and Ice Suppz delivered approximately
`
`15,000 more pounds of hemp material to Crown; however, the offered replacement biomass
`
`material was moldy, muddy, wet, and stored in black garbage bags. Crown again immediately
`
`rejected acceptance, informed Mr. Becker and Ice Suppz of the rejection of the goods and
`
`requested Ice Suppz to pick up the approximate 40,000 total pounds of nonconforming goods from
`
`its facility.
`
`
`
`Crown has incurred storage costs for the storage of the deficient material and loss
`
`of use of its warehouse space. Furthermore, Crown is incurring the ongoing cost of fumigation of
`
`the material to prevent pest infestation of its other commercial activities, including tobacco
`
`production.
`
`
`
`Crown issued demand letters to each Defendant in an attempt to resolve this matter
`
`on December 10, 2020. Defendants failed to respond.
`
`
`
`Crown was never provided with acceptable substitute material, its $200.000.00 was
`
`never returned, and the deficient material continues to sit in Crown’s facility.
`
`
`
`Due to Defendants’ actions, Crown has suffered actual damages in excess of
`
`$200,000, including the $200,000.00 remitted for the biomass, and costs related to storage and
`
`fumigation of the deficient material that Defendants refuse to retrieve.
`
`V. CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`COUNT I: BREACH OF ORAL CONTRACT AGAINST BECKER AND ICE SUPPZ
`
`
`
`
`
`The allegations in sections I and IV are re-alleged herein.
`
`Crown entered an oral contract with Defendant Josh Becker for brokerage services
`
`for the purchase of hemp plant material, subject to the quality parameters dictated by Crown. Upon
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 8
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 9 of 14 PageID 9Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 9 of 14 PageID 9
`
`information and belief, Becker was acting as an agent for Ice Suppz, as an undisclosed principal.
`
`
`
`Crown performed by timely remitting payment for the services Mr. Becker
`
`represented he was capable of brokering, including, but not limited to, providing biomass of the
`
`quality that Crown desired.
`
`
`
`Defendants Josh Becker and Ice Suppz materially breached the contract with Crown
`
`by failing to provide the agreed-upon goods and brokerage services. Specifically, Josh Becker and
`
`Ice Suppz breached the contract by failing to provide biomass meeting the express conditions
`
`provided by Crown and by failing to provide acceptable substitute material after Crown had timely
`
`rejected the nonconforming material.
`
`
`
`Defendants’ breach has caused actual damages to Crown, in addition to attorney's
`
`fees as allowed by TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 38.001, et seq.
`
`COUNT II: FRAUD AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
`
`The allegations in section I and IV are re-alleged herein.
`
`Defendants made misrepresentations and omissions to Crown related to their
`
`
`
`
`
`services, their abilities, and the nature, quality, and source of the hemp plant material Crown
`
`desired.
`
`
`
`Defendants knew such representations were false at the time they were made, and
`
`intentionally made such false representations of material fact or made them recklessly and allowed
`
`Crown to rely on them.
`
`
`
`Defendant Josh Becker’s false representations include the following: that he was a
`
`broker capable of brokering the transaction and providing the hemp plant material Crown desired;
`
`that he had sourced and located material of the quality Crown desired; that Defendant Ice Suppz
`
`was the source from which the materials would be purchased; that, upon learning the provided
`
`material was unacceptable, rejected, and requested to be picked up by Crown, and that he would
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 9
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 10 of 14 PageID 10Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 10 of 14 PageID 10
`
`rectify the issue by providing acceptable replacement biomass material. Additionally, on or about
`
`May 13, 2020, Becker (individually and on behalf of Ice Suppz and Nalpdog) sent certificates of
`
`analysis related to the quality (specifically the THC content) of the hemp material to be sent to
`
`Crown; those certificates were false and did not represent the quality of the product Becker
`
`(individually and on behalf of Ice Suppz and Nalpdog) intended to sell to Crown.
`
`
`
`Defendant Ice Suppz’s false representations include the following: that it was the
`
`supplier of the material Crown desired; that, upon payment of $200,000.00 made directly by
`
`Crown to Ice Suppz, it would provide the desired material; and that, after Mr. Becker relayed that
`
`Crown had rejected the nonconforming material and requested for the material to be picked up,
`
`Ice Suppz had or could provide conforming substitute goods and pick up any deficient material.
`
`Additionally, on or about May 13, 2020, Becker (individually and on behalf of Ice Suppz and
`
`Nalpdog) sent certificates of analysis related to the quality (specifically the THC content) of the
`
`hemp material to be sent to Crown; those certificates were false and did not represent the quality
`
`of the product Becker (individually and on behalf of Ice Suppz and Nalpdog) intended to sell to
`
`Crown.
`
`
`
`Defendant Nalpdog’s false representations include the following: that, pursuant to
`
`the invoice it drafted and issued to Crown for the hemp plant material, it had sourced and located
`
`material of the quality Crown desired and that it could provide the desired material. Additionally,
`
`on or about May 13, 2020, Becker (individually and on behalf of Ice Suppz and Nalpdog) sent
`
`certificates of analysis related to the quality (specifically the THC content) of the hemp material
`
`to be sent to Crown; those certificates were false and did not represent the quality of the product
`
`Becker (individually and on behalf of Ice Suppz and Nalpdog) intended to sell to Crown.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 10
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 11 of 14 PageID 11Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 11 of 14 PageID 11
`
`
`
`Crown relied on these misrepresentations to its detriment, these representations
`
`were false, and Crown suffered actual damages. Crown seeks to recover all damages from
`
`Defendants to which Crown is entitled, including actual, consequential, and exemplary damages
`
`as allowed by law. Crown further seeks out-of-pocket damages.
`
`COUNT III: NEGLIGENCE AGAINST ICE SUPPZ, LLC
`
`The allegations in section I and IV are re-alleged herein.
`
`As Crown’s broker and supplier, Defendant Ice Suppz owed a duty of care to Crown
`
`
`
`
`
`in sourcing, procuring, and supplying the desired hemp material.
`
`
`
`Defendant Ice Suppz was negligent in the location, procurement, and supply of the
`
`hemp material. Ice Suppz failed to even perform cursory due diligence in locating, procuring, and
`
`supplying the hemp material.
`
`
`
`It was foreseeable that Defendant Ice Suppz’s negligence could and did cause
`
`damages to Plaintiff.
`
`
`
`Defendant Ice Suppz’s conduct fell below the standard of care of competent hemp
`
`brokerage/supplier companies. Defendant Ice Suppz’s negligence was the producing cause of
`
`Plaintiff’s damages, including Plaintiff’s actual damages of the loss of more than $200,000.
`
`Plaintiff seeks all damages to which it is entitled from Defendant Ice Suppz due to its negligence.
`
`COUNT IV: NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
`
`
`
`
`
`The allegations in section I and IV are re-alleged herein.
`
`Defendants made several misrepresentations of material fact to Crown related to
`
`their services, their abilities, and the nature, quality, and source of the hemp plant material Crown
`
`desired.
`
`
`
`Defendant Josh Becker’s false representations include the following: that he was a
`
`broker capable of brokering the transaction and providing the hemp plant material Crown desired;
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 12 of 14 PageID 12Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 12 of 14 PageID 12
`
`that he had sourced and located material of the quality Crown desired; that Defendant Ice Suppz
`
`was the source from which the materials would be purchased; that, upon learning the provided
`
`material was unacceptable, rejected, and requested to be picked up by Crown, he would rectify the
`
`issue; and that he could procure the desired material, provide substitute conforming goods, and
`
`pick up any deficient material.
`
`
`
`Defendant Ice Suppz’s false representations include the following: that it was the
`
`supplier of the material Crown desired; that, upon payment of $200,000.00 made directly by
`
`Crown to Ice Suppz, it would provide the desired material; and that, after Mr. Becker relayed that
`
`Crown had rejected the nonconforming material and requested for the material to be picked up,
`
`Ice Suppz had or could provide conforming substitute goods and pick up any deficient material.
`
`
`
`Defendant Nalpdog’s false representations include the following: that, pursuant to
`
`the invoice it drafted and issued to Crown for the hemp plant material, it had sourced and located
`
`material of the quality Crown desired and that it could provide the desired material.
`
`
`
`The above misrepresentations of material fact were done intentionally or in the
`
`alternative, negligently, by Defendants to Crown. Defendants had knowledge of these
`
`representations and did not inform Crown otherwise either intentionally, or negligently.
`
`
`
`Crown seeks all damages to which Crown is entitled from Defendants due to their
`
`negligent misrepresentations.
`
`COUNT V: UNJUST ENRICHMENT AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
`
`
`
`
`
`The allegations in section I and IV are re-alleged herein.
`
`In the alternative, Defendants have obtained a benefit from Crown by fraud and the
`
`taking of an undue advantage.
`
`
`
` Defendant Josh Becker was unjustly enriched by acts of fraud and
`
`misrepresentation related to his services, his abilities, and the nature, quality, and source of the
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 12
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 13 of 14 PageID 13Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 13 of 14 PageID 13
`
`hemp plant material Crown desired, and Josh Becker now enjoys the benefit of Crown’s funds.
`
`Josh Becker should be disgorged of this benefit by this Court on the equity of the circumstances.
`
`
`
`Defendant Ice Suppz was unjustly enriched by acts of fraud and misrepresentation
`
`related to its services, its abilities, and the nature, quality, and source of the hemp plant material
`
`Crown desired, and Ice Suppz now enjoys the benefit of Crown’s funds. Ice Suppz should be
`
`disgorged of this benefit by this Court on the equity of the circumstances.
`
`
`
`Defendant Nalpdog was unjustly enriched by acts of fraud and misrepresentation
`
`related to its services, its abilities, and the nature, quality, and source of the hemp plant material
`
`Crown desired, and Nalpdog now enjoys the benefit of Crown’s funds. Nalpdog should be
`
`disgorged of this benefit by this Court on the equity of the circumstances.
`
`VI. DAMAGES
`
`
`
`Plaintiff seeks damages for the causes of action asserted herein. Plaintiff has been
`
`damaged by the fraudulent misrepresentations made by Defendants regarding their services, their
`
`abilities, and the nature, quality, and source of the hemp plant material, as well as Plaintiff’s
`
`reliance on said fraudulent misrepresentations.
`
`
`
`VII. ATTORNEY’S FEES
`
`
`
`Plaintiff requests an award of its reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees pursuant
`
`to TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICES & REMEDIES CODE § 38.001.
`
`VII. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
`
`
`
`All conditions precedent to the maintenance of this cause of action and Plaintiff's
`
`recovery thereon, including attorney's fees, have occurred, or been performed, including the notice
`
`requirements of TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE § 17.505 and TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 38.002.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 13
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 14 of 14 PageID 14Case 3:21-cv-01052-B Document 1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 14 of 14 PageID 14
`
`VIII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Plaintiff requests that, after final trial, judgment be entered against Defendants for:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Compensatory, special, and consequential damages resulting from Defendants’
`misconduct described above.
`
`Prejudgment and post-judgment interest.
`
`Costs of suit.
`
`Attorneys’ fees.
`
`Exemplary damages.
`
`All other relief, in law and in equity, to which Plaintiff may be entitled.
`
`
`
`DATE: May 10, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ John S. Adams
`John S. Adams
`Texas Bar No. 24097277
`jadams@lynnllp.com
`LYNN PINKER HURST & SCHWEGMANN, LLP
`2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2700
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: (214) 981-3800
`Facsimile: (214) 981-3839
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Chelsie N. Spencer
`Texas Bar No. 24094959
`cspencer@ritterspencer.com
`Paul C. Stevenson
`Texas Bar No. 24117098
`pstevenson@ritterspencer.com
`RITTER SPENCER PLLC
`15455 Dallas Parkway, Suite 600
`Addison, Texas 75001
`Telephone: (214) 295-5074
`Facsimile: (214) 329-4362
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`CROWN DISTRIBUTING LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket