`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
`
`Case No. 1:24-cv-00001
`
`
`
`
`
`SPACE EXPLORATION
`TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
`BOARD, a federal administrative agency,
`JENNIFER ABRUZZO, in her official
`capacity as the General Counsel of the
`National Labor Relations Board, LAUREN
`M. McFERRAN, in her official capacity as
`the Chairman of the National Labor
`Relations Board, MARVIN E. KAPLAN,
`GWYNNE A. WILCOX, and DAVID M.
`PROUTY, in their official capacities as
`Board Members of the National Labor
`Relations Board, and JOHN DOE in his
`official capacity as an Administrative Law
`Judge of the National Labor Relations
`Board,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF PAIGE HOLLAND-THEILEN IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
`INTERVENE
`
`
`2920505.1
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00001 Document 22 Filed on 01/08/24 in TXSD Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`I, Paige Holland-Thielen, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I was employed by Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (“SpaceX”) beginning
`
`in 2018 as a Ground Software Engineer.
`
`2.
`
`My employment was involuntarily terminated on June 16, 2022. At the time of
`
`my termination my position was Lead Avionics Operations and Automation Engineer.
`
`3.
`
`During my entire employment with SpaceX I worked at its headquarters which is
`
`located at One Rocket Road, Hawthorne, CA 90250. During the course of my employment with
`
`SpaceX I lived in Torrance, California.
`
`4.
`
`On or about December 14, 2021 I became aware of published accounts by several
`
`former employees of having been sexually harassed at SpaceX, and then having been retaliated
`
`against by HR for reporting it. I found these accounts very disconcerting.
`
`5.
`
`Separately, on or about May 19, 2022, I learned that SpaceX’s CEO Elon Musk
`
`was accused of sexually harassing a SpaceX flight attendant and that in response, he publicly
`
`ridiculed the alleged victim. In response to Musk’s denial and ridicule of the alleged victim,
`
`SpaceX’s President, Gwynne Shotwell, publicly supported Musk by sending an email to the
`
`company claiming that the allegations against him were not true.
`
`6.
`
`In addition to these specific issues arising from the allegations concerning Musk’s
`
`alleged sexual harassment, I, as a SpaceX employee, was continually bombarded with social
`
`media posts by CEO Elon Musk degrading women and the LGBTQ community that featured
`
`inappropriate sexual comments and jokes. These posts were actively circulated in the workplace,
`
`with many actually posted on internal SpaceX platforms, making it impossible for employees to
`
`avoid Musk’s degrading and demeaning comments. Indeed, important information about our
`
`substantive work was often mixed into Musk’s Tweets, so we could not afford to ignore them.
`
`
`2920505.1
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00001 Document 22 Filed on 01/08/24 in TXSD Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`7.
`
`Neither SpaceX management nor its Human Relations department took corrective
`
`action to remediate the hostile work environment that was created by Musk.
`
`8.
`
`In order to try to effectuate change in the workplace, in late May 2022, I began
`
`discussing with other colleagues mechanisms for getting management to take action. I attended
`
`a series of meetings at SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne and at nearby off-campus locations to
`
`discuss what action we could take. I and others in the group decided to write an Open Letter to
`
`SpaceX’s executive team asking that the company distance itself from Musk’s social media
`
`comments—that is, make clear that those comments were not SpaceX’s own position—and that
`
`it clarify and enforce an anti-harassment policy in the workplace.
`
`9.
`
`I, along with other SpaceX employees shared this letter internally within SpaceX
`
`channels from California on June 15, 2022.
`
`10. On June 16, 2022, SpaceX terminated my employment at an in-person meeting in
`
`Hawthorne, California. The termination meeting was attended by Vice President of HR, Brian
`
`Bjelde, HR Manager Rebecca Balayan, with President Gwynne Shotwell attending by video
`
`conference.
`
`11. During the termination meeting the above SpaceX officials told me that my
`
`employment was being terminated for my participation in conceiving of, drafting, and
`
`distributing the Open Letter.
`
`12. After my termination I, along with other seven other colleagues who were
`
`terminated over the same issue (participating in the Open Letter) retained counsel (Anne Shaver
`
`of Lieff, Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and Laurie Burgess of Burgess Law Offices, P.C.)
`
`to file charges under the NLRB on our behalf.
`
`
`2920505.1
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00001 Document 22 Filed on 01/08/24 in TXSD Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`13. Our counsel filed charges of unfair labor practices with the NLRB Region 31 in
`
`Los Angeles on November 16, 2022.
`
`14.
`
`I spent significant time providing evidence of SpaceX’s misconduct to NLRB
`
`agents in Region 31 in Los Angeles, California. Thereafter my counsel filed amended charges
`
`and on January 3, 2024 Region 31 issued a complaint with a hearing set for March 5, 2024 in
`
`Los Angeles, California.
`
`15. My lawyers advised me that SpaceX filed a Complaint in Texas on January 4,
`
`2024. I have reviewed that Complaint, which among other things seeks to require a “trial by
`
`jury” of the allegations contained in the NLRB Complaint. In fact, SpaceX’s employment
`
`agreement that I was required to execute requires all employees to forego trial by jury as a term
`
`of employment by forcing us to accept arbitration of all employment-related disputes. The
`
`agreement further provides that such disputes must take place “in the state of the SpaceX facility
`
`in which I primarily work or in the case that I work remotely, the state of the SpaceX facility in
`
`which my supervisor(s) work(s). Where the facility is in Hawthorne or Los Angeles, California,
`
`the arbitration will occur in Los Angeles County, California." Therefore, pursuant to SpaceX’s
`
`employment agreement any claims that involve my employment must be adjudicated in Los
`
`Angeles, California.
`
`16. Other mandatory employment documents mandate that legal actions with SpaceX
`
`are governed by the laws of the State of California. Specifically, the “confidentiality agreement”
`
`states that “[t]he validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be
`
`governed by the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to the principles of conflict
`
`of laws.”
`
`
`2920505.1
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00001 Document 22 Filed on 01/08/24 in TXSD Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`17.
`
`It would be a hardship for me to participate in any litigation in the State of Texas.
`
`I would have to bear extra expenses that would not be required for me to testify in California,
`
`where my job is based and I have family.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`
`true and correct.
`
`Executed on the 8th of January, 2024 in Raleigh, North Carolina.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 8, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Paige Holland-Thielen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2920505.1
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`