throbber
Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document 1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 1 of 9
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHER DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`HOUSTON DIVISION
`
`
`

`
`
`
` AUDREY TRUSSELL,

`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` §
`
`
`v.
`
` §
`
`
`
`
`COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH
`ST. JOSEPH MANOR ASSISTED LIVING, §
`ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM, AND §
` §
` §
`
`
`
`
` Defendant. §
`
`
`
`__________________________________________§
`
`
`
`
`PLANTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`A. Parties
`
`1. Plaintiff Audrey Trussell is a resident of Brazos County, Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`2. St. Joseph Manor Assisted Living, St. Joseph Health System, and
`
`CommonSpirit Health are Texas based entities, who may be served by serving its registered
`
`agent, C T Corporation System, at 1999 Bryan St., Ste. 900, Dallas, Texas, 75201-3136.
`
`
`
`B. Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`
`
`3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 42 U.S.C.
`
`§1983 and 28 U.S.C. §1331.
`
`
`4. Venue is proper in this district under 42 U.S.C. §2000e-5(f)(3) because the alleged
`
`unlawful employment practice was committed in this district. Plaintiff was employed and
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document 1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 2 of 9
`
`
`worked for Defendant in Brazos County, Texas and was discriminated against in violation of
`
`Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) while employed with Defendant and working for it in Brazos
`
`County, Texas. It was here where the Plaintiff was subjected to the discriminatory and/or
`
`retaliatory actions that were described in her EEOC charge and set forth in this petition. Venue is
`
`proper in this district under 42 U.S.S. §2000e-5(f)(3) because based on information and belief
`
`the employment records relevant to the alleged unlawful employment practice are maintained
`
`and administered in this district.
`
`
`C. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies
`
`
`
`5. Plaintiff timely filed a charge of discrimination against defendant with the Equal
`
`Opportunity Employment Commission (EEOC). Plaintiff files this complain within 90 days after
`
` receiving a notice of the right to sue from the EEOC. A copy of the notice of the right to sue is
`
`attached as Exhibit A.
`
`
`6. All conditions precedent to the institution of this action have been fulfilled.
`
`
`
`
`
`D. Statement of Facts
`
`7. Plaintiff worked for St. Joseph Manor Assisted Living in 2016. Since that time, she
`
`never had any adverse performance or disciplinary actions. St. Joseph Manor Assisted Living is a
`
`part of the St. Joseph Health System and CommonSpirit Health.
`
`8. The Plaintiff is a member of the Gathering of Christ Church in which one of their
`
`beliefs is that the body is a temple of the Holy Spirit and should not be contaminated with
`
`unclean animals.
`
`9. The religion does not believe in placing foreign substances into their body that are
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document 1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 3 of 9
`
`produced by unclean animals. Many vaccines are made from the blood of diseased animals,
`
`decomposed animal parts and are not clean or sterile.
`
`10. The Defendant was aware of the Plaintiff’s religion. The Plaintiff had a religious
`
`vaccine exemption with the Defendant since 2018. Furthermore, the Plaintiff’s supervisor,
`
`Felicia Thomas, spoke to Plaintiff about her religion on several occasions.
`
`11. The Plaintiff took her first COVID test for the Defendant on or around April 9, 2020,
`
`after being told that there was nothing on the cotton swap and therefore nothing was being placed
`
`into her body.
`
`12. The Plaintiff was later informed there may be substances on the cotton swab when the
`
`test is performed.
`
`13. On May 11, 2020, Governor Greg Abbott directed that 100 percent of staff and
`
`residents in Texas Nursing facilities be tested for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID), the virus that caused
`
`COVID-19.
`
`
`14. The Defendant then put into place a policy which would require the Plaintiff to be
`
`retested.
`
`15. On or about May 17, 2020, Plaintiff requested additional information from the
`
`Defendant about the test to ensure sure she was not committing sin in her religion due to possible
`
`substances being on the cotton swab.
`
`16. On or about May 22, 2020, Kathryn Adams called the Plaintiff to discuss the issues.
`
`However, instead of giving the information to the Plaintiff for her to make an informed decision
`
`regarding the COVID test, she told her she would be terminated due to her refusal to take the
`
`COVID test and due to her religion.
`
`17. Kathryn Adams then followed up with a very different email stating that the Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document 1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 4 of 9
`
`refused to take the test and she had until May 27, 2020, to apply for another position, take the
`
`test or be terminated.
`
`18. On or about May25, 2020, before the deadline, the Plaintiff was escorted from the
`
` building during her shift and terminated.
`
`19. Even after her termination, the Plaintiff received communications from a co-worker
`
`that the Defendant discussed the reason for the Plaintiff’s termination was due to her
`
`religion.
`
`20. The effect of St. Joseph’s unlawful employment practices complained of herein has
`
`been to deprive the Plaintiff of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect
`
`her status as an employee based on religion, and because she engaged in activity protected by
`
`Title VII.
`
`
`21. As a result of St. Joseph’s unlawful actions, Plaintiff suffered pecuniary, non-
`
`pecuniary, and other loses and damages.
`
`
`22. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were intentional.
`
`23. The unlawful employment practices complained above were done with malice and/or
`
` reckless indifference to Plaintiff’s federally protected rights.
`
`
`Causes of Action
`
`A. RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
`
`24. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges all of the above paragraphs, the same as if fully set
`
` forth herein.
`
`25. Defendant is an employer and Plaintiff is an employee within the meaning of Title
`
`VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (“Title VII”).
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document 1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 5 of 9
`
`26. Plaintiff is a member of the Gathering of Christ Church which does not allow certain
`
`medical procedures such as COVID testing.
`
`27. Plaintiff was otherwise qualified to perform her position with the Defendant.
`
`28. The Defendant discriminated against the Plaintiff because of Plaintiff’s religious
`
`beliefs in violation of Title VII.
`
`29. Defendant terminated Plaintiff from Plaintiff’s position with Defendant because of
`
`Plaintiff’s religion in violation of Title VII.
`
`30. Defendant’s discrimination was willful, malicious and made with reckless disregard
`
`for Plaintiff’s rights.
`
`31. Defendant’s religious discrimination caused Plaintiff to suffer severe stress, mental
`
`anguish, emotional pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life.
`
`32. Defendant is liable for back pay, front pay, punitive damages, compensatory
`
`damages, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
`
`B. RETALIATION
`
`33. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges all of the above paragraphs, the same as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`34. Defendant is an employer and Plaintiff is an employee within the meaning of Title
`
`VII.
`
`35. Plaintiff engaged in activity protected by Title VII (opposing unlawful employment
`
`practices and making complaints of religious discrimination).
`
`36. Plaintiff was subject to an adverse employment action in that the Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document 1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 6 of 9
`
`terminated Plaintiff from Plaintiff’s position in retaliation for exercising Plaintiff’s rights under
`
`Title VII (opposing unlawful employment practices and making complaints of religious
`
`discrimination) in violation of Title VII.
`
`37. A causal link exists between the protected activity and the adverse employment
`
`action.
`
`38. Defendants’ alleged justification for Plaintiff’s termination was pretext for retaliation
`
`in violation of Title VII.
`
`39. Under Title VII, Defendant is liable for retaliation.
`
`40. Defendant’s relation was willful, malicious, and made with reckless disregard for
`
`Plaintiff’s rights.
`
`41. Defendant’s retaliation caused Plaintiff to suffer severe stress, mental anguish,
`
`emotional pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life.
`
`42. Defendant is liable for back pain, front pay, punitive damages, compensatory
`
`damages, reasonable attorney’ fees and costs.
`
`Inconsistent Causes of Action
`
`43. To the extent that any causes of action or theories pled by Plaintiff are deemed
`
`inconsistent, said inconsistent causes of action and/or theories are intended be pled “In the
`
`Alternative.”
`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff requests that Defendant be cited to
`
`Prayer for Relief
`
`appear and answer herein, and that on final trial Plaintiff have the following:
`
`a. Award Plaintiff back pay and front pay.
`
`b. Award Plaintiff compensatory damages, including mental anguish damages.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document 1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 7 of 9
`
`c. Award Plaintiff punitive or exemplary damages.
`
`d. Award Plaintiff general, actual and consequential damages.
`
`e. Award Plaintiff prejudgement and post-judgement interest as provided by law.
`
`f. Award Plaintiff cost of suit and reasonable attorney’s fees.
`
`g. Award Plaintiff such other and further relief to which Plaintiff is justly entitled.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Gigit Tyler
`Gigit Tyler
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`State Bar No: 24095869
`Tyler & Maderer PLLC
`8900 Eastloch Dr #215
`Spring, TX 77379
`(832) 761-7773
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jury Trial Demand
`
`The Plaintiff requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by this Complaint that are triable
`to a jury.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Registered Agent for Service of Process:
`C T Corporation System
`999 Bryan St., Ste. 900
`Dallas, Texas, 75201-3136.
`
`Donatella Yelda, Paralegal
`CommonSpirit Health
`185 Berry St
`STE 200 LBBY 2
`San Fancisco, CA 94107
`
`Elizabeth McNamee
`CommonSpirit Health
`198 Inverness Dr W
`Englewood CO 80112
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document 1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 8 of 9
`
`
`EXHIBIT
`A
`
`

`

`AOOOO
`
`The facts alleged in the chargefail to state a claim under anyof the statutes enforced by the EEOC.
`
`Yourallegations did not involve a disability as defined by the Americans With Disabilities Act.
`
`The Respondent employs less than the required number of employeesor is not otherwise covered bythe statutes.
`
`timely filed with EEOC;
`Your charge was not
`discrimination to file your charge
`
`in other words, you waited too long after the date(s) of the alleged
`
`The EEOC issues the following determination: The EEOC will not proceed further with its investigation, and makes no
`determination about whether further investigation would establish violations of the statute. This does not mean the claims
`have no merit. This determination does not certify that the respondent is in compliance with the statutes. The EEOC
`makesnofinding as to the merits of any other issues that might be construed as having been raised by this charge.
`
`The EEOC has adopted thefindings of the state or local fair employment practices agency that investigated this charge.
`
`Case 4:21-cv-04211 Document1 Filed on 12/29/21 in TXSD Page 9 of 9
`EEOC Form 161(11/2020)
`U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
`
`DISMISSAL AND NOTICE OF RIGHTS
`
`To: Audrey K. Trussell
`1918 Briar Oaks Dr. Apt. D
`Bryan, TX 77802
`
`From: Houston District Office
`Mickey Leland Building
`1919 Smith Street, 7th Floor
`Houston, TX 77002
`
`[|
`
`EEOC Charge No.
`
`On behalfofperson(s) aggrieved whoseidentity is
`CONFIDENTIAL (29 CFR §1601.7(a))
`EEOC Representative
`
`460-2020-05735
`
`DeAnna Brooks-Torres,
`Investigator
`
`Telephone No.
`
`(346) 327-7727
`
`THE EEOC IS CLOSING ITS FILE ON THIS CHARGE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
`
`LT Other (briefly state)
`
`- NOTICE OF SUIT RIGHTS-
`(See the additional information attached tothis form.)
`
`Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, or the Age
`Discrimination in EmploymentAct: This will be the only notice of dismissal and of your right to sue that we will send you.
`You mayfile a lawsuit against the respondent(s) under federal law based on this charge in federal or state court. Your
`lawsuit must be filed WITHIN 90 DAYS of your receipt of this notice; or your right to sue based onthis chargewill be
`lost.
`(The timelimit forfiling suit based on a claim understate law maybedifferent.)
`
`Equal Pay Act (EPA): EPA suits must befiled in federal or state court within 2 years (3 yearsfor willful violations) of the
`alleged EPA underpayment. This means that backpay duefor any violations that occurred more than 2 years (3 years)
`before youfile suit may not be collectible.
`,
`
`.
`.
`On behalf of the Commission_,
`' Digitally signed by DeAnna Brooks-Torres
`DeAn Na B rooks-Torres. Date: 2021,09.30 12:16:46 -05'00'
`Rayford O.Irvin,
`(Date Issued)
`District Director
`
`Lowell Keig, Director
`Texas Workforce Commission Civil Rights Division
`101 East 15" St.
`Room 144T
`Austin, TX 78778
`
`Enclosures(s)
`
`cc:
`
`Donatella Yelda, Paralegal
`CommonSpirit Health
`185 BERRY ST
`STE 200 LBBY 2
`San Francisco, CA 94107
`
`Elizabeth McNamee,
`CommonSpirit Health
`198 INVERNESS DR W
`Englewood, CO 80112
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket