throbber
Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 1 of 18
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`4:22-cv-290
`Case No. _______________
`
`PREPARED FOOD PHOTOS, INC. f/k/a
`ADLIFE MARKETING &
`COMMUNICATIONS CO., INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`RR USA INVESTMENTS LLC,
`d/b/a DON JAVIER MEAT MARKET &
`TAQUERÍA,
`
`Defendant.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff Prepared Food Photos, Inc. f/k/a Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
`
`(“Plaintiff”) sues defendant RR USA Investments LLC, d/b/a Don Javier Meat Market & Taquería
`
` (“Defendant”), and alleges as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`Florida with its principal place of business located in Palm Beach County, Florida.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of
`
`the State of Texas with its principal place of business located at 13526 Tidwell Road, Ste 500,
`
`Houston, Texas 77044-1552. Defendant’s Agent for Service of Process is Javier H. Valdivieso-
`
`Perry, 3611Barton Lane, Sugar Land, Texas 77479.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 2 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`1331 and 1338(a).
`
`
`
`4.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`1331 and 1338(a).
`
`5.
`
` This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because it is a citizen and
`
`resident of Texas and because it maintained sufficient minimum contacts with Texas such that the
`
`exercise of personal jurisdiction over it would not offend traditional notions of fair play and
`
`substantial justice.
`
`6. Venue properly lies in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a) because
`
`Defendant or its agents reside or may be found in this district. “It is well established that, for
`
`purposes of Section 1400(a), a defendant ‘may be found’ in any district in which it is subject to
`
`personal jurisdiction.” Isbell v. DM Records, Inc., No. 3:02-CV-1408-G, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
`
`10394, at *41 (N.D. Tex. June 4, 2004) (“Because the court has determined that it has
`
`personal jurisdiction over DM, DM ‘may be found’ in this district and venue is therefore proper.”).
`
`I.
`
`Plaintiff’s Business
`
`FACTS
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiff is in the business of licensing high-end, professional photographs for the
`
`food industry.
`
`8.
`
`Through its commercial website (www.preparedfoodphotos.com), Plaintiff offers
`
`a monthly subscription service which provides access to/license of tens of thousands of
`
`professional images.
`
`9. As of the date of this pleading, Plaintiff charges its clients (generally, grocery
`
`stores, restaurant chains, food service companies, etc.) a monthly fee of $999.00 for access to its
`
`library of professional photographs.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 3 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. Plaintiff does not license individual photographs or otherwise make individual
`
`photographs available for purchase. Plaintiff’s business model relies on its recurring monthly
`
`subscription service such that Plaintiff can continue to maintain its impressive portfolio.
`
`11. Plaintiff owns each of the photographs available for license on its website and
`
`serves as the licensing agent with respect to licensing such photographs for limited use by
`
`Plaintiff’s customers. To that end, Plaintiff’s standard terms include a limited, non-transferable
`
`license for use of any photograph by the customer only. Plaintiff’s license terms make clear that
`
`all copyright ownership remains with Plaintiff and that its customers are not permitted to transfer,
`
`assign, or sub-license any of Plaintiff’s photographs to another person/entity.
`
`II.
`
`The Work at Issue in this Lawsuit
`
`12.
`
`In 1997,
`
`a professional photographer
`
`created
`
`a photograph
`
`titled
`
`“RawChickenTender005_ADL” (the “Work”). A copy of the Work is exhibited below.
`
`13. The Work was registered by Plaintiff (pursuant to a work-for-hire agreement with
`
`the author that transferred all rights and title in the photograph to Plaintiff) with the Register of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 4 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Copyrights on January 23, 2017 and was assigned Registration No. VA 2-046-891. A true and
`
`correct copy of the Certification of Registration pertaining to the Work is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit “A.”
`
`14. Plaintiff is the owner of the Work and has remained the owner at all times material
`
`hereto.
`
`III. Defendant’s Unlawful Activities
`
`15. Defendant owns and operates meat market, grocery store, and taqueria in Houston,
`
`Texas.
`
`16. Defendant advertises/markets its business primarily through its aforementioned
`
`website
`
`(https://donjaviermeatmarket.com/),
`
`social
`
`media
`
`(e.g.
`
`https://www.facebook.com/donjaviermeatmarket/?ref=page_internal), and other
`
`forms of
`
`advertising.
`
`17. On a date after Plaintiff’s above-referenced copyright registration of the Work,
`
`Defendant
`
`published
`
`the
`
`Work
`
`on
`
`its
`
`Facebook
`
`page
`
`(https://www.facebook.com/donjaviermeatmarket/photos/)
`
`in connection with
`
`the sale of
`
`“Chicken Tenders”:
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 5 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18. A true and correct copy of screenshots of Defendant’s website, displaying the
`
`copyrighted Work, is attached hereto as Exhibit “B.”
`
`19. The foregoing display of the Work on Defendant’s website was accessible and was
`
`in fact accessed from persons in the State of Florida.
`
`20. Defendant is not and has never been licensed to use or display the Work. Defendant
`
`never contacted Plaintiff to seek permission to use the Work in connection with its Facebook
`
`page/advertising or for any other purpose – even though the Work that was copied is clearly
`
`professional stock photography that would put Defendant on notice that the Work was not intended
`
`for public use.
`
`21. Defendant utilized the Work for commercial use – namely, in connection with the
`
`marketing of Defendant’s business and sale of chicken tenders.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 6 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22. Upon information and belief, Defendant located a copy of the Work on the internet
`
`and, rather than contact Plaintiff to secure a license, simply copied the Work for its own
`
`commercial use.
`
`23. Through its ongoing diligent efforts to identify unauthorized use of its photographs,
`
`Plaintiff first discovered Defendant’s unauthorized use/display of the Work in approximately
`
`October of 2020. Following Plaintiff’s discovery, Plaintiff notified Defendant in writing of such
`
`unauthorized use. To date, Plaintiff has been unable to negotiate a reasonable license for the past
`
`infringement of her Work.
`
`24. All conditions precedent to this action have been performed or have been waived.
`
`COUNT I – COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`
`25. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 24 as set forth above.
`
`26. The Work is an original work of authorship, embodying copyrightable subject
`
`matter, that is subject to the full protection of the United States copyright laws (17 U.S.C. § 101 et
`
`seq.).
`
`27. Plaintiff owns a valid copyright in the Work, having registered the Work with the
`
`Register of Copyrights and owning sufficient rights, title, and interest to such copyright to afford
`
`Plaintiff standing to bring this lawsuit and assert the claim(s) herein.
`
`28. As a result of Plaintiff’s reproduction, distribution, and public display of the Work,
`
`Defendant had access to the Work prior to its own reproduction, distribution, and public display
`
`of the Work on its commercial website.
`
`29. Defendant reproduced, distributed, and publicly displayed the Work without
`
`authorization from Plaintiff.
`
`30. By its actions, Defendant infringed and violated Plaintiff’s exclusive rights in
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 7 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`violation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501, by reproducing, distributing, and publicly
`
`displaying the Work for its own commercial purposes.
`
`31. Defendant’s infringement was willful as it acted with actual knowledge or reckless
`
`disregard for whether its conduct infringed upon Plaintiff’s copyright. Notably, Defendant
`
`protects its copyrighted material on its website by publishing a copyright management notice,
`
`“Copyright © 2021 Don Javier Meat Market - All Rights Reserved” which asks others to respect
`
`its intellectual property rights. Therefore, Defendant clearly understands that high-end food
`
`photography is not generally available for free or that such can simply be copied from the internet.
`
`32. Plaintiff has been damaged as a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s
`
`infringement.
`
`33.
`
` Plaintiff is entitled to recover its actual damages resulting from Defendant’s
`
`unauthorized use of the Work and, at Plaintiff’s election (pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(b), Plaintiff
`
`is entitled to recover damages based on a disgorgement of Defendant’s profits from infringement
`
`of the Work, which amounts shall be proven at trial.
`
`34. Alternatively, and at Plaintiff’s election, Plaintiff is entitled to statutory damages
`
`pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), in such amount as deemed proper by the Court.
`
`35. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505, Plaintiff is further entitled to recover its costs and
`
`attorneys’ fees as a result of Defendant’s conduct.
`
`36. Defendant’s conduct has caused and any continued infringing conduct will continue
`
`to cause irreparable injury to Plaintiff unless enjoined by the Court. Plaintiff has no adequate
`
`remedy at law. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502, Plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction
`
`prohibiting infringement of Plaintiff’s exclusive rights under copyright law.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant as follows:
`
`7
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 8 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a. A declaration that Defendant has infringed Plaintiff’s copyrights in the Work;
`
`b. A declaration that such infringement is willful;
`
`c. An award of actual damages and disgorgement of profits as the Court deems proper or, at
`
`Plaintiff’s election, an award of statutory damages for willful infringement up to
`
`$150,000.00 for each infringement of the Work;
`
`d. Awarding Plaintiff its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505;
`
`e. Awarding Plaintiff interest, including prejudgment interest, on the foregoing amounts;
`
`f. Permanently enjoining Defendant, its employees, agents, officers, directors, attorneys,
`
`successors, affiliates, subsidiaries and assigns, and all those in active concert and
`
`participation with Defendant, from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff’s copyrights
`
`or continuing to display, transfer, advertise, reproduce, or otherwise market any works
`
`derived or copied from the Work or to participate or assist in any such activity; and
`
`g. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`Demand For Jury Trial
`
`Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issued so triable.
`
`Dated: January 28, 2022.
`
`
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. University Drive
`Suite 301
`Coral Springs, FL 33065
`Telephone: (877) 437-6228
`dan@copycatlegal.com
`
`By: /s/ Daniel DeSouza______
`Daniel DeSouza, Esq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 9 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 10 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 11 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 12 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 13 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 14 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 15 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 16 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 17 of 18
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-00290 Document 1 Filed on 01/28/22 in TXSD Page 18 of 18
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket