throbber
Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 1 of 39
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 22-CV-____ (___)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
`
`
`
`
`
`EDWARD CONSTANTIN, a/k/a “MrZackMorris,”
`a/k/a “Edward Constantinescu,”
`PERRY MATLOCK, a/k/a “PJ Matlock,”
`THOMAS COOPERMAN, a/k/a “Tommy Coops,”
`GARY DEEL, a/k/a “Mystic Mac,”
`MITCHELL HENNESSEY, a/k/a “Hugh Henne,”
`STEFAN HRVATIN, a/k/a “LadeBackk,”
`DANIEL KNIGHT, a/k/a “Deity of Dips,” and
`JOHN RYBARCYZK, a/k/a “Ultra Calls,” a/k/a
`“The Stock Sniper,”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff, Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), alleges the
`
`following against the defendants:
`
`SUMMARY
`
`1.
`
`To their legions of followers on social media, the eight defendants have, for years,
`
`promoted themselves as trustworthy stock-picking gurus. In reality, they are seasoned stock
`
`manipulators. They identify stocks ripe for manipulation, acquire substantial positions in these
`
`securities, and then recommend those stocks as good investments to their followers on Twitter, in
`
`online stock-trading forums they run, and on podcasts. They encourage their followers to
`
`purchase the selected stocks, often claiming that they likewise have bought or intend to buy these
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 2 of 39
`
`stocks for themselves and hold them. Instead, the defendants sell their shares into the demand
`
`that their deceptive promotions generate.
`
`2.
`
`Seven of the defendants—Perry Matlock, Edward Constantin, Thomas
`
`Cooperman, Gary Deel, Mitchell Hennessey, Stefan Hrvatin, and John Rybarcyzk—carried out
`
`the scheme, coordinating the acquisition of shares, promoting the shares to their followers, and
`
`dumping the shares for substantial profits. They were aided and abetted by Daniel Knight, who
`
`with Hennessey, co-hosted a popular stock-trading podcast that promoted the other defendants as
`
`expert traders and provided a platform for other defendants to deceptively promote the stocks
`
`they intended to dump.
`
`3.
`
`From at least January 2020 through present (the “Relevant Period”), the eight
`
`Defendants earned approximately $100 million from this stock-manipulation scheme.
`
`VIOLATIONS
`
`4.
`
`As a result of the conduct alleged herein, defendants Constantin, Matlock,
`
`Cooperman, Deel, Hennessey, Hrvatin, and Rybarcyzk violated, and unless restrained and
`
`enjoined will continue to violate, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”)
`
`[15 U.S.C. §77q(a)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15
`
`U.S.C. §78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5(a), (b) & (c)]. Knight aided
`
`and abetted, and unless restrained and enjoined, will continue to aid and abet these violations of
`
`the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
`
`NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND RELIEF SOUGHT
`
`5.
`
`The Commission seeks a permanent injunction against the Defendants, enjoining
`
`them from engaging in transactions, acts, practices, and courses of business of the type alleged in
`
`this Complaint; disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains from the unlawful conduct set forth in this
`

`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 3 of 39
`
`Complaint, together with prejudgment interest; civil penalties pursuant to Section 20(d) of the
`
`Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77t(d)] and/or Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C.
`
`§78u(d)(3)]; and such other relief as the Court may deem appropriate. The Commission further
`
`seeks an order barring Hrvatin from participating in any offering of a penny stock, pursuant to
`
`Section 20(g) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77t(g)] and/or 21(d) of the Exchange Act [15
`
`U.S.C. §78u(d)].
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`6.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 22(a) of the
`
`Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77v(a)] and Sections 21(d), 21(e), and 27 of the Exchange Act [15
`
`U.S.C. §§78u(d), 78u(e), and 78aa].
`
`7.
`
`Venue lies in this Court pursuant to Section 22(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C.
`
`§77v(a)] and Section 27 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §78aa]. Certain of the acts, practices,
`
`transactions and courses of business alleged in this Complaint occurred within the Southern
`
`District of Texas, and were effected, directly or indirectly, by making use of means or
`
`instrumentalities of transportation or communication in interstate commerce, or the mails. Four
`
`Defendants reside in the Southern District of Texas, where they communicated with co-
`
`defendants in furtherance of the fraud scheme and made numerous false and deceptive
`
`statements as described herein.
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`8.
`
`Edward Constantin, a/k/a “MrZackMorris,” a/k/a “Edward Constantinescu,” 38,
`
`is a resident of Houston, Texas. His Twitter account, @MrZackMorris, had more than 551,000
`
`followers as of December 2022. Constantin is a co-founder of Atlas Trading, a stock-trading
`
`forum on the social media platform Discord, which offers users the ability to communicate via
`

`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 4 of 39
`
`voice calls, video calls, and text messaging, among other things.
`
`9.
`
`Perry Matlock, a/k/a “PJ Matlock,” age 38, is a resident of The Woodlands,
`
`Texas. His Twitter account, @PJ_Matlock, had more than 340,000 followers as of December
`
`2022. Matlock refers to himself as the “CEO” and co-founder of Atlas Trading.
`
`10.
`
`Thomas Cooperman, a/k/a “Tommy Coops,” 34, is a resident of Beverly Hills,
`
`California. His Twitter account, @ohheytommy, had more than 129,000 followers as of
`
`December 2022. Cooperman is a member of the electronic music group Breathe Carolina and,
`
`with Gary Deel, runs a YouTube channel called the “Goblin Gang,” described as “[t]wo multi-
`
`millionaire day traders filming their lives for the internet to see.”
`
`11. Gary Deel, a/k/a “Mystic Mac,” 28, is a resident of Beverly Hills, California. His
`
`Twitter account, @notoriousalerts, had approximately 144,000 followers as of December 2022.
`
`With Cooperman, Deel runs the Goblin Gang YouTube channel.
`
`12. Mitchell Hennessey, a/k/a “Hugh Henne,” 24, is a resident of West New York,
`
`New Jersey. Along with Daniel Knight, Hennessey hosts the “Pennies: Going in Raw” podcast,
`
`which promotes Atlas Trading. His Twitter account, @Hugh_Henne, had more than 237,000
`
`followers as of December 2022.
`
`13.
`
`Stefan Hrvatin, a/k/a “LadeBackk,” 35, is a resident of Miami, Florida. His
`
`Twitter account, @LadeBackk, had more than 150,000 followers as of December 2022.
`
`14.
`
`Daniel Knight, a/k/a “Deity of Dips,” 28, is a resident of Houston, Texas. With
`
`Hennessey, Knight is a co-host of the Pennies: Going in Raw podcast. His Twitter account,
`
`@DipDeity, had more than 171,000 followers as of December 2022.
`
`15.
`
`John Rybarcyzk, a/k/a “Ultra Calls,” a/k/a “The Stock Sniper,” 32, is a resident
`
`of Spring, Texas. His Twitter account, @Ultra_Calls, had more than 267,000 followers as of
`

`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 5 of 39
`
`December 2022. Rybarcyzk is the founder of Sapphire Trading, another stock trading forum on
`
`Discord.
`
`16.
`
`Defendants Constantin, Matlock, Cooperman, Deel, Hennessey, Hrvatin, and
`
`Rybarcyzk are referred to herein as the “Primary Defendants.” With the addition of Knight, the
`
`collective group of all defendants is referred to herein as the “Defendants.”
`
`I.
`
`SUMMARY OF SCHEME
`
`FACTS
`
`
`17.
`
`The Defendants engaged in a long-running fraudulent scheme to manipulate
`
`securities by publishing false and misleading information in online stock-trading forums, on
`
`podcasts, and through their Twitter accounts. The Primary Defendants, aided and abetted by
`
`Knight, engaged in a pattern of conduct, sometimes referred to as “scalping,” in which they
`
`recommended the purchase of a particular stock without disclosing their intent to sell that stock.
`
`They generally executed their scheme in three phases. First, one or more of the Primary
`
`Defendants identified a security to manipulate (the “Selected Stock”) and purchased shares of
`
`that particular security. By sharing the name of the Selected Stock among some or all of the
`
`group, the Defendants provided each other with the opportunity to purchase shares at lower
`
`prices prior to the manipulation. Next, they promoted the stock to their followers on podcasts
`
`and/or social media platforms in order to generate demand and inflate the share price. Typically,
`
`the Primary Defendants announced price targets, teased upcoming news about the company,
`
`and/or stated their intention to buy shares or hold their current positions for longer periods.
`
`Finally, after promoting the stock to their followers in these ways, the Primary Defendants sold
`
`their shares into the demand generated by their recommendations. When the scheme succeeded,
`
`the Primary Defendants were able to sell their shares at higher prices and make profits. In order
`

`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 6 of 39
`
`to cover up their scheme and continue perpetrating it, the Primary Defendants at various points
`
`deleted old tweets and Discord chats, and lied to their followers about the reasons why particular
`
`stock picks were followed by declines in the prices of those stocks, obscuring their own roles in
`
`causing losses among their followers and other retail investors.
`
`18.
`
`None of the Primary Defendants disclosed that they were either planning to sell,
`
`or were actively selling, a Selected Stock while recommending that their followers buy it. Nor
`
`did any of the Primary Defendants disclose that they were coordinating with each other to
`
`manipulate the price and volume of trading in the stocks they were promoting. Moreover, the
`
`Primary Defendants’ deception extended beyond their omissions and outright lies about their
`
`intentions regarding, and views about, the securities they were promoting. For instance,
`
`sometimes they peddled false or misleading news about particular stocks through social media or
`
`podcast interviews. On some occasions, the Primary Defendants lied about losing money on a
`
`particular stock when in reality they had profited handsomely, in order to generate trust among
`
`their followers—trust that was necessary to perpetuate the scheme and ensure that their followers
`
`would continue to purchase shares based on their future recommendations. Indeed, in private
`
`chats and surreptitiously recorded conversations, they bragged and laughed about making profits
`
`at the expense of their followers.
`
`19.
`
`Defendants’ specific roles in the fraudulent scheme varied depending on the
`
`timeframe and the specific security at issue. Typically, only a subset of the Primary Defendants
`
`participated in the manipulation of a particular stock. Those Primary Defendants would agree on
`
`a Selected Stock in which they would each establish a position (i.e., “load” or “load up” on the
`
`stock). After loading up on the Selected Stock, most, if not all, of the Primary Defendants who
`
`had established positions in that stock would recommend it to their followers. The Primary
`

`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 7 of 39
`
`Defendants often referred to “swinging” or taking a “swing” position in the stock, by which they
`
`conveyed to their followers that they intended to hold onto the stock for at least a day, and likely
`
`longer. As the Primary Defendants involved in the deceptive promotion of a particular stock
`
`often informed other Defendants of their plans, those not directly promoting the stock could—
`
`and often did—take advantage of the advance knowledge by purchasing the Selected Security, in
`
`advance of the promotion, and selling the Selected Security at inflated prices that resulted from
`
`the promotion. Over the course of the ongoing scheme, all of the Primary Defendants, aided and
`
`abetted by Knight, engaged in this conduct, participating directly in scalping and other deceptive
`
`conduct, and all of the Defendants profited from the knowledge that others were doing so.
`
`20.
`
`The Primary Defendants deceptively promoted stocks through three channels:
`
`stock-trading forums on Discord; podcasts; and Twitter.
`
`21. Online stock-trading forums. In 2018, Defendants Matlock and Constantin
`
`founded Atlas Trading (“Atlas”)—a free online forum that cultivated a following of novice stock
`
`traders by purporting to provide educational content about trading and securities markets. Atlas
`
`describes itself as “a team of consistent profitable traders who are willing to educate beginning
`
`traders with free resources of education, free trading alerts and ideas.” Atlas is hosted on
`
`Discord, a social media platform that offers users the ability to communicate via voice, video,
`
`and text messaging, among other things. Matlock and Constantin are among a small group of
`
`individuals who control the portion of the forum in which various Defendants recommended
`
`specific stocks (the “SMALL CAPS trading floor”). Sub-forums such as the SMALL CAPS
`
`trading floor are referred to as “channels” on Discord. Although anyone could view the content
`
`on the SMALL CAPS trading floor channel, only individuals who are granted permission by the
`
`small group of members that include Matlock and Constantin are permitted to post content there.
`

`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 8 of 39
`
`As Matlock explained, “the … [SMALL CAPS] trading floor is locked . . . to most. We kind of
`
`reserve this channel for people who know more about stocks and have better information that
`
`we’ve, you know, deemed worthy, I guess you could say, and they’ll discuss tickers in here . . .
`
`during market hours, it’s more about calls and what’s going on with the market.” At various
`
`times from 2018 to the present, Matlock and Constantin, along with Rybarcyzk, Deel,
`
`Hennessey, Cooperman, and Knight, were allowed to post stock recommendations on the Atlas
`
`SMALL CAPS trading floor. By early 2021, Atlas had more than 150,000 members.
`
`22.
`
`In 2018, Rybarcyzk founded Sapphire Trading (“Sapphire”), another stock-
`
`trading forum on Discord. Sapphire featured a channel called the “pro-trader floor” that was
`
`analogous to Atlas’s SMALL CAPS trading floor. In addition to Rybarcyzk, Defendants Deel
`
`and Cooperman were permitted to post on Sapphire’s pro-trader floor. By mid-2021, Sapphire
`
`had nearly 60,000 members.
`
`23.
`
`Podcasts. In July 2020, Knight and Hennessey launched a podcast called
`
`“Pennies: Going in Raw” (“PGIR”). PGIR bills itself as an informational podcast “[d]iscussing
`
`volume, price targets, penny stocks, accumulation, reverse splits and much more” and claims to
`
`be the “#1 Stock Market Podcast in America” with over 2.3 million downloads. PGIR served as
`
`a platform to promote Atlas and the Defendants, most of whom sat for multiple interviews with
`
`Knight and Hennessey.
`
`24.
`
`Twitter. Each of the Defendants amassed substantial numbers of followers on
`
`Twitter, where they regularly post about stocks they are manipulating. The term “FinTwit”
`
`refers to the community of Twitter users that regularly tweet about finance and the stock market.
`
`Defendants considered themselves influential within the FinTwit community. As Hennessey
`
`remarked in a private Discord chat, “20 of us run fintwit an [sic] we have more money then [sic]
`

`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 9 of 39
`
`some countries.” The Defendants each included disclaimers on their Twitter accounts that they
`
`were not providing stock recommendations or financial advice. But they intended for their
`
`followers to act on their promotional tweets, and understood that their followers would do so.
`
`Constantin, for example, acknowledged in an interview with Knight and Hennessey on PGIR: “I
`
`understand that if I call something, you know, everybody and their mom is going to buy.” That
`
`expectation is reflected in hundreds of tweets by the Defendants, including in the examples
`
`below during the Relevant Period:
`
`a. Rybarcyzk (“The Stock Sniper” / @Ultra_Calls): If you didn’t bank with the
`gang today; then idk what’s wrong. Gave this alert on Twitter and Sapphire
`Trading Discord (1000% FREE)
`
`b. Cooperman (“Tommy Coops” / @ohheytommy): Hope everyone banked on
`this one. Did exactly what I said . Support entries and then NHOD [New High
`of the Day]. Didn’t wanna just keep talking about it <3  
`  
`c. Deel (“Mystic Mac” / @notoriousalerts): Alright Goblins I’m out for the day.
`EVERYONE should have banked with me on the initial $EXPR call at 5.15 or
`on the dip entry a second ago. Love you guys I’ll see you all tomorrow to
`make stupid money with you again!
`
`d. Matlock (@PJ_Matlock): I’ll never get sick of pumping.... money into my
`followers bank accounts. LETS ALL GET RICH!
`
`e. Hennessey (@Hugh_Henne): Every single member of atlas admin Have the
`same goal... to get as many people away from the 9-5 slavery and into the
`area of financial freedom and f u money. ❤ our gains but seeing stories of
`others paying off debt& banking is much more rewarding @MrZackMorris
`@PJ_Matlock
`
`f. Knight (“Dan, Deity of Dips” / @DipDeity): Congrats to all the longs that
`banked with me on this one. I know I called it right as the market opened, but
`if you caught this one - you should be thanking me now
`
`g. Hrvatin (@LadeBackk,): Next week I’m gonna have a nice one for us.
`Promise. I might even say something along the lines of… “Get in p*ssy, we’re
`going to the moon.”
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 10 of 39
`
`25.
`
`Defendants regularly promoted their own stock-trading success, and the
`
`substantial wealth it brought them, along with the success of individuals who followed their
`
`advice, in order to further their scheme and encourage their followers on social media to act on
`
`their recommendations. For example:1
`
`Hennessey:
`
`a. On June 15, 2020, Hennessey tweeted: “6/15/2020: Decent day for the
`swings. Had to deal with something personal early this morning.. but working
`on a few new winners Had a blast w my boy @notoriousalerts An hour of
`bro’s, analogies and lessons! $1 MILLION in UNDER a YEAR Trading
`Stocks!!!”
`
`b. On December 19, 2020, Hennessey tweeted: “ATLAS has the most self made
`millionaires We do not even know the names of the people that consider us
`their "competition" We are the '85 Bears. No one survives.”
`
`c. On December 25, 2020, Hennessey tweeted: “Merry Christmas. Steps to
`financial freedom 1). Compound gains
`
`
`@MrZackMorris [Constantin] $800 to what 15...20 mil in 3 years
`
`
`@PJ_Matlock [Matlock] few k to MILLIONS
`
`
`@notoriousalerts [Deel] $1,000 to 500ish k in 15 months
`
`
`@DipDeity [Knight] $4,000 to 6 figures in a year
`
`
`WE DID IT SO CAN YOU...”
`
`
`
`
`
`Cooperman:
`
`d. On April 4, 2021, Cooperman tweeted: “Get some sleep tonight gang.
`Tomorrow we continue the journey to you becoming a f*cking millionaire.
`BRING YOUR F*CKING SHOES!”
`
`Hrvatin:
`
`                                                            
`1 Throughout the Complaint, expletives have been redacted in part with asterisks from the
`original text. Tweets and Atlas posts are generally italicized but otherwise unchanged, with
`spelling/grammatical errors preserved.
`

`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 11 of 39
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 12 of 39
`
`Constantin is depicted in front of the Ferrari in the picture at left; Constantin,
`
`Knight and a third individual (redacted in part) are depicted in front of the Ferrari
`
`in the picture at right.
`
`Rybarcyzk:
`
`h. On November 22, 2021, Rybarcyzk tweeted: “I don’t want clout. I want my
`every single one of my followers to be millionaires.”
`
`i. On December 29, 2021, Rybarcyzk tweeted: “I’m trying to hit 777
`millionaire traders 2022. I’m gonna make it happen. It’s not my goal to only
`make me prosper. I want all of you to prosper. I’m gonna make each and
`every one of you make it. The market is so universal. You just adapt to current
`conditions. Let’s go crazy.”
`
`j. On July 26, 2021, Rybarcyzk tweeted:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`12
`
`
`

`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 13 of 39
`
`Deel:
`
`k. On July 16, 2021, Deel tweeted: “Actually 500 into 7Million, but who’s
`counting.”
`
`l. October 29, 2021, Deel tweeted: “Bout 5K short of a million dollar month.
`Truly UN F*CKING REAL!!!! We will nail in on November I promise you
`that!!!! LETS GO!”
`
`Tweets like those identified above served to further the scheme by convincing
`
`26.
`
`followers that acting on the Primary Defendants’ recommendations would likely lead to
`
`significant wealth, and by falsely portraying their trading methods as accessible to anyone
`
`willing to learn.
`
`27.
`
`As described above, defendants repeatedly sold shares in direct contradiction to
`
`their public statements to followers on social media that they were continuing to buy, and or
`
`holding their positions, in anticipation of higher share prices. This practice is called “dumping,”
`
`and despite repeatedly dumping their stock as they recommended it to their followers, the
`
`Primary Defendants reassured their followers and the general public that they did not engage in
`
`such behavior, as illustrated by the false and misleading statements and posts below from the
`
`Relevant Period:
`
`
`
`
`
`a. Constantin (Twitter): I don’t dump on people.
`
`b. Constantin (PGIR Interview): I’m not going to like continue calling
`something just so, you know, we can get out. We take our losses, whatever,
`you move on.
`
`c. Matlock (Twitter): And I’m not pumping and dumping on anyone. Why would
`I sell when I truly believe $RIBT gets over $1.50-$2. Haters mad to see
`anyone winning and come out if the stock is down 3% . All I post is
`information about it.
`
`d. Deel (Twitter): $BCTX recap: I buy stocks that I think have a good chart and
`good news. That’s how I always play it and sometimes it goes the wrong way.
`That’s trading. I never dump shares on alerts. BCTX got smacked hard on a
`vwap reject and I took the L with you guys earlier. On to next
`

`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 14 of 39
`
`
`
`
`
`28.
`
`e. Cooperman (Twitter): so we are CRYSTAL F*CKING CLEAR ... i dont dump
`on my followers. nor do i even have the following big enough to dump all my
`shares on. if i say i think something is going to do something THATS WHAT I
`THINK ITS GONNA DO.
`
`f. Rybarcyzk (Twitter): You guys are my family. Whoever has my back is a real
`MVP. I’ve posted many negative P&L images. I don’t dump on anyone. If I
`have to I’ll just take my losses. I have diamond hands though.
`
`These false and misleading statements furthered the Primary Defendants’ scheme
`
`by building trust among their followers, so that the Primary Defendants could continue to
`
`deceptively promote stocks, and continue to profit by selling their shares into the demand that
`
`their promotion generated, all without disclosing either their plans to sell, or their actual sales.
`
`29.
`
`The Defendants understood that they were participating in an unlawful market-
`
`manipulation scheme, and that they were profiting from misleading their followers. The
`
`Defendants sometimes discussed their scheme over Discord voice chats that they believed were
`
`private, but were being recorded. For example, on March 1, 2021, Knight and Cooperman
`
`(along with others) discussed the group’s manipulation of the securities of GTT
`
`Communications, Inc., which at the time traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)
`
`under the ticker GTT.2 The following is a portion of the conversation:
`
`Knight: Get caught? . . . We’re robbing f*cking idiots of their money. . .
`
`Cooperman: It’s so funny because I can see the . . . . I can like see the timeline of these.
`Like I get it [the ticker], I send it to Dan [Knight]. I know Dan’s on voice. Dan tells you
`guys. I see it go up more. Then I send it to Gary [Deel] and I see it go up like way more
`[laughter] . . . . My other thing is too, is like alright, if we lose on one of these, we’ve
`won on like a hundred so . . . We gotta remember with these Ultra [Rybarcyzk] ones,
`they all do the same thing. It like spikes, comes down for a second—
`
`Knight: Then the scalpers get out, like Gary [Deel] gets out, then—
`
`                                                            
`2 The NYSE delisted GTT on August 2, 2021.
`

`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 15 of 39
`
`Cooperman: And then it goes f*cking bukoo, but no, that’s not only it. Like what he
`[Rybarcyzk] does is he alerts it, and then like five minutes later, all his little minions start
`like retweeting it and saying added with him, so it like builds the hype back up. It
`happens every single time. They have their shit down to a f*cking science, it’s crazy.
`Cooperman, Knight, and others were watching GTT’s stock price and volume in real time
`
`
`
`during that conversation. An unidentified individual exclaimed, “Wow, big dump!” Cooperman
`
`then commented that he understood that at least one of the Primary Defendants, Rybarcyzk, was
`
`dumping at that moment. He stated: “I can like see them in my head coming out of the candle.
`
`Like weee! [laughter] Weee!” Knight responded, “Another banger call guys,” referring to the
`
`promotion. Knight went on to make fun of Rybarcyzk’s followers who were losing money as
`
`Rybarcyzk’s share dump crashed the stock price: “And all his [Rybarcyzk’s] followers are like,
`
`‘Uh, yo we can’t sell today, I don’t have any day trades left.’”3 Knight’s mocking of
`
`Rybarcyzk’s followers elicited laughter. The group continued to mock Rybarcyzk’s followers.
`
`Playing the role of one of Rybarcyzk’s followers, Cooperman asked: “Is this a swing?” eliciting
`
`laughter. Knight continued, imitating Rybarcyzk’s followers: “Please be a swing.”
`
`30.
`
`In another surreptitiously recorded Discord call, on February 24, 2021, involving
`
`Knight, Cooperman, and others, Knight acknowledged that he understood the Primary
`
`Defendants were engaging in market manipulation, and explained why he posted fewer
`
`recommendations on Twitter and Atlas than the Primary Defendants:
`
`“[The less] I mention a stock, the less likely I get involved whenever all of
`Atlas gets a class action f*cking lawsuit . . . I’m playing this extremely
`smart, for the very long term. If you don’t think all these f*ckers go to jail
`or at least get sued, you are crazy. . . playing stupid does not work in
`court. . . it’s market manipulation. . . . I mean you look up the definition of
`market manipulation . . .”
`
`                                                            
`3 The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority imposes certain restrictions on the number of “day trades” allowed in
`certain types of accounts below certain asset thresholds.
`

`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 16 of 39
`
`31.
`
`Despite understanding that the Primary Defendants were engaging in market
`
`manipulation and profiting from misleading recommendations to their followers on Twitter,
`
`Atlas, and Sapphire, Knight continued to promote the Primary Defendants as expert traders on
`
`PGIR and provided them with a platform to peddle misleading statements about the stocks they
`
`were promoting. Knight himself profited from the fraud scheme by taking positions in the stocks
`
`that he knew the Primary Defendants were manipulating, and selling into the demand the
`
`Primary Defendants generated through the fraud scheme. Although Knight posted less
`
`frequently about the stocks, his role on the podcast was often to ask questions intended to elicit
`
`Hennessey or others to promote a stock.
`
`32.
`
`As noted, the Primary Defendants regularly trumpeted their trading successes to
`
`their followers. They held themselves out as stock picking experts worthy of the substantial
`
`followings they had amassed. But they also from time to time claimed they lost money on
`
`particular stock “plays.” Many of these claims of losses were false and designed to conceal the
`
`fact that the Primary Defendants had profited by dumping their shares into the demand their
`
`deceptive promotions had generated.
`
`33.
`
`For example, on August 11, 2021, Rybarcyzk claimed in a tweet that he lost
`
`money trading on ABVC Biopharma Inc. (NASDAQ: ABVC), which he had previously
`
`recommended to his followers:
`$ABVC Strange action today . Bag holder here 👋 honestly doesn’t make
`sense. Ran from $3.30 to $4.40’s yesterday and to $4.20’s today. But
`faded due to shorts and scalpers. I’m sure some made money. But I hold
`my word and don’t dump on anyone.
`
`Here, Rybarcyzk claimed that he lost money trading ABVC Biopharma (he was a “[b]ag
`
`holder”), and that others (including short sellers and “scalpers”) caused the share price to drop,
`
`but that he did not make money because he does not “dump” shares on anyone. But Rybarcyzk
`

`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 17 of 39
`
`actually made approximately $68,690 on August 10 and August 11, 2021 (the day he posted that
`
`tweet) by dumping his shares while recommending ABVC to his followers.
`
`34.
`
`Similarly, on March 18, 2021, Deel, having promoted American Resources Corp.
`
`(Ticker: AREC) to his followers, claimed he lost $20,000:
`
`Deel (@notoriousalerts): “$AREC stopped me guys. Sorry about this one I lost
`20k here it looks like 1.5M shares were sold over 5. Sorry to anyone who took
`with me. Had great news this morning but didn’t wanna go. I’ll look for us a
`better one”
`In fact, Deel made more than $7,000 dumping his AREC shares on that day alone (and over
`
`$6,000 selling his shares into demand generated by his posts the day before).
`
`35.
`
`Others Primary Defendants also deceived their followers about profits and losses
`
`to further the scheme. Matlock, for example, having promoted FDS Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:
`
`HUGE) to followers, reported on Atlas on February 3, 2021: “HUGE I took the loss on it too.
`
`We will find a better one.” Matlock in fact made approximately $27,734 dumping his HUGE
`
`shares the day he made that post.
`
`II.
`
`Examples of Manipulation
`
`A.
`
`36.
`
`Camber Energy, Inc.
`
` Several Primary Defendants manipulated the stock of Camber Energy, Inc. at
`
`various times from August to October 2021. Camber Energy trades on the New York Stock
`
`Exchange under the ticker “CEI.” Deel, Matlock, and Cooperman established positions in CEI
`
`stock and sold into their deceptive promotion in early August 2021; Constantin and Hvartin
`
`established positions in the stock and sold into their deceptive promotion in September and
`
`October 2021. CEI was one of the Selected Stocks.
`
`August 3-5, 2021: Deel, Matlock, and Cooperman
`
`37. Matlock and Deel began purchasing shares of CEI on August 3, 2021.
`

`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-04306 Document 1 Filed on 12/13/22 in TXSD Page 18 of 39
`
`Cooperman bought shares the next day. By the afternoon of August 4, 2021, all three had
`
`acquired significant positions in CEI, with Deel owning 936,422 shares acquired at an average
`
`price of $.46 per share, Matlock owning 835,429 shares acquired at an average price of $.46 per
`
`share, and Cooperman owning 405,000 shares acquired at an average price of $.47 per share.
`
`Then, at 3:37 p.m. Deel posted the following message about CEI on Twitter and on Atlas:
`
`$CEI I added for a swing. Volume is starting to come into pennies this
`week and this is very cheap. On the daily chart we have formed a double
`bottom. Last time it was at these prices we went to $3. So that leaves a lot
`of range.
`Matlock echoed the sentiment, posting on Atlas at 3:38 p.m.: “Adding CEI with you that's cheap
`
`AF,” using an abbreviation for the slang term cheap “as f*ck.”
`
`38. Within the next four minutes after those posts, Matlock sold 165,100 shares, Deel
`
`sold 60,000 shares, and Cooperman sold 240,000 shares of CEI, as the price rose by a penny per
`
`share. At 3:43 p.m., Deel, Matlock, and Cooperman posted about CEI a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket