throbber
Filed
`12 January 16 A11:07
`Gary Fitzsimmons
`District Clerk
`Dallas District
`
`

`

`Jennifer Edgeworth
`January 16, 2012
`Page 2
`
`outstanding sum'against Keltkens within ten (10) days notice to Kelfkens. If Kelflrens does
`not pay the remaining outstanding sum within ten (10) day notice, Kelfkens agrees to
`cooperate and enter into an Agreed Judgment for the remaining outstanding sum, court costs,
`and any attorney fees incurred by CrCon to file and perfect the judgment against Kelfkens.
`
`In efforts to assure compliance with the terms, conditions, and promises made within this
`Rule 11 Agreement, and all future agreements including a final settlement agreement, JMS
`shall supply to counsel for C—Con a quarterly report identifying service reports and sales
`records of JMS and client lists. Counsel for C—Con agrees to enter into a confidentiality
`agreement and to not disclose any customer, client, or financial information to third parties,
`including C-Con, other than whether Kelfkens, Gotshall, and IMS are in compliance with the
`final settlement agreement. If JMS, Kelfl<ens, or Gotshall are not in compliance, C-Con’s
`counsel can disclose which customer or client is involved in the violation.
`
`If JMS, Gottshall, or Kelfkens is in breach of the agreement not to sell Renishaw products or
`services to C-Con customers identified on the Client List, 75% of the gross revenue from
`such customer shall be paid to C-Con within thirty (30) days of notice of the breach. If
`Kelfkens, Gottshall, and/or JMS does not pay the remaining outstanding sum within thirty
`(30) days of notice of the breach, C-Con may file suit against Kelfkens, Gottshall, and/or
`JMS to recover the outstanding amount owed. C-Con would then be entitled to recover court
`costs and any attorney fees incurred by C-Con to recover the amount owed.
`
`All Parties agree that the $2,000 bond previously posted on behalf of C-Con pursuant to the
`Temporary Restraining Order granted by the Court is unnecessary and C—Con and/or its
`attorneys may seek the return of those funds from the Court without objection from any Party
`and that
`the $2,000 bond is not necessary to support the validity of the Temporary
`Restraining Order or this Agreement.
`
`All Parties agree that this Rule 11 Agreement supersedes and replaces all previous oral or
`written agreements or contracts between Edwin Kelfkens and C-Con.
`
`By signing and entering into this agreement, you represent that you have your clients authority
`and permission to enter into the binding Rule 11 Agreement, and that your clients agree to be bound by
`the terms of this Rule 11 Agreement just as if they, Edwin Kelfl<ens, Bart Gottshall, andfor JMS signed
`this agreement.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Zaaflwaf
`
`Rob D. Ramage
`
` = 22/ ' ” / ,
`
`% /MW
`
`Jennifer Edgeworth
`
`
`
`Attorney for Defendant Kelfkens, JMS Supply
`And Bart Gottshall.
`
`1939.02/cdn
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket