throbber
FILED
`2/9/2023 12:55 FM
`JOHN F. WARREN
`COUNTY CLERK
`DALLAS COUNTY
`
`
`
`IN THE COUNTY COURT
`
`AT LAW NO.
`
`DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`§ § § § § §
`
`§ § §
`
`§ § §
`
`GARY HOLLAND,
`
`Plaintifé,
`
`VS.
`
`LATONJA LOUISE REED,
`TEXAS FARM BUREAU
`CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
`AND JOHN DOE,
`
`Defendants.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`FO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
`
`NOW COMES GARY HOLLAND, (“Plaintiff”), and files this PLAINTIFF’S
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION complaining of LATONJA LOUISE REED, TEXAS FARM
`
`BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,and JOHN DOE(hereafter referred
`
`to as “Defendants”), and would respectfully show to the Court the following:
`
`I.
`DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN
`
`Pursuant to Rule 190.3 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff requests a
`
`Level II discovery control plan.
`
`Il.
`
`PARTIES
`
`Plaintiffis a resident of Dallas County, Texas.
`
`Defendant LATONJA LOUISE REEDis a resident of Dallas County, Texas.
`
`Service of process can be made at her regular place of abode located at 419 Bissonet
`
`
`
`Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75217.
`
`PLAINTIFI’S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page [1
`
`

`

`
`
`Defendant TEXAS FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
`
`is a domestic insurance company and is authorized to transact business in the State of
`
`Texas. Service of process will be made through the State of Texas Commissioner of
`
`Insurance located at 333 Guadalupe, Austin, Texas 78701.
`
`Defendant JOHN DOEis the unidentified driver who allegedly was involved in
`
`the accident made the basis of this lawsuit. Defendant John Doe’s address is unknown
`
`to Plaintiff. No citation is requested at this time.
`
`I.
`VENUE AND JURISDICTION
`
`Venuein this case is proper pursuant to § 15.002(a)(1) of the Texas Civil Practice
`
`and Remedies Code because ail or a substantial part of the events giving rise to the
`
`claims occurred in Dallas County, Texas.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case because the amount in
`
`controversy, exclusive of costs and interest, is within the jurisdictional limits of this
`
`Court.
`
`Plaintiff seeks monetary relief over $100,000 but not more than $200,000.
`
`IV.
`FACTS
`
`1.
`
`On or about April 9, 2021, Plaintiff Gary Holland was. sitting in his parked 2020
`
`Ford Fusion onthe parking lot of the United States Postal System’s branch office located
`
`at 350 Buckner Blvd., Dallas, Texas 75217. Defendant Latonja Louise Reed was driving
`
`her large Chevrolet Silverado Pickup Truck. Defendant told the investigating police
`
`officer that an alleged “phatom hit-and-run vehicle” hit her truck and drove away from
`
`the accident. Consequently, Defendant Reed suddenly and without notice reversed her
`
`PLAINTLFIPS ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page [2
`
`

`

`very lard truck without safety and crashed into Plaintiff’s mid-sized car. Defendant Reed
`
`crashed the left rear quarter panel of her Chevrolet Silverado truck into Plaintiff's For
`
`Fusion car causing Plaintiff bodily injuries and property damage. Defendant Latonja
`
`Louise Reed’s acts of negligence proximately caused the accident and Plaintiff's injuries
`
`and damages.
`
`7.
`
`At the time of the accident, Plaintiff Gary Holland was insured by Texas Farm
`
`Bureau Casualty Insurance Company for liability coverage, personal injury protection
`
`benefits, and uninsured/underinsured coverage. Plaintiff was covered by the insurance
`
`policy issued by Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company.
`
`8.
`
`Attime ofthe accident, Plaintiff was protected by the insurance policy against loss
`
`for bodily injuries and property damage that resulted from the ownership, maintenance,
`
`or use of an uninsured/underinsured motor vehicle and said insurance policy was issued
`
`by Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company.
`
`9.
`
`Having determined that the alleged unknown fleeing vehicle was uninsured at the
`
`time of the occurrence, as that term is defined under the policy of insurance, Plaintiff
`
`timely and properly notified Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
`
`of the accident throughits claims representative. Plaintiff has fully complied with all the
`
`conditions of the insurance policy prior to bringing lawsuit.
`
`10,
`
`Ali conditions precedent have been performed or have occurred. Nevertheless,
`
`Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company has failed and refused, and
`
`continues to still faif and refuses, to pay Plaintiff benefits as it is contractually required to
`
`do.
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiff has been compelled to engage the services of the attorneys whose nameis
`
`subscribed to this pleading for the prosecution and collection of the claim. Therefore,
`
`PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page |[3
`
`
`
`

`

`Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
`
`Company the additional sum of 18 percent per annum of the amount payable underthe
`
`policy, together with a reasonable sum for the necessary services of Plaintiff's attorneys
`
`in the preparation andtrial of this action, including any appeal to the Court of Appeals
`
`and/or the Supreme Court of Texas.
`
`Vv.
`CAUSES OF ACTION AGAINST
`DEFENDANT LATONJA LOUISE REED
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff incorporates Paragraphs 1-11 herein by reference as if stated verbatim
`
`pursuant to Rule 58 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff would show this
`
`Court that the negligent acts and omissions of Defendant Latonja Louise Reed and the
`
`statutory violations, as set out herein, separately and collectively, were the direct and
`
`proximate causes of the accident in question and the resulting injuries and damages
`
`sustained and incurred by Plaintiff.
`
`13.
`
`The statutory violations constitute negligence per se. The violations, negligent
`
`acts, and omissions are, among others, as follows:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`C.
`
`d.
`
`e,
`
`f.
`
`Defendant failed to keep the proper lookout as required pursuant
`§545.052(1) of the Tex. Trans. Code Ann.;
`
`to
`
`Driver inattention pursuant to § 542.408 of the Tex. Trans. Code Ann.;
`
`failed to drive in a single lane as required pursuant
`Defendant
`§545.060(a)(1) of the Tex. Trans. Code Ann.,;
`
`to
`
`Defendant failed to control the speed of the vehicle she was operating in
`compliance with §545.351(b)(1) and §545.351(b)(2) of the Tex. Trans.
`Code Ann.;
`
`Defendant failed to maintain an assured distance between her vehicle and
`Plaintiffs vehicle;
`
`Defendant negligently and violently reversed her vehicle;
`
`PLAINTLEF’S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page |4
`
`

`

`Defendant failed to sound her horn as required under § 547.501(a) of the
`Tex. Trans. Code. Ann.;
`
`Defendantfailed to apply the brakes of her vehicle immediately prior to the
`collision in question;
`
`Defendant failed to timely apply the brakes on her vehicle immediately
`priorto the collision in question;
`
`Defendant failed to turn her vehicle in order to avoid the collision in
`question; and
`
`Violating at least Sections 542.301, 545.053(a)(1), 545.351(a) and (b),
`535.35 1(c)(5), 545.401(a), and 552.008(2) of the Tex. Trans. Code Ann.
`
`VI.
`NEGLIGENT CAUSES OF ACTION
`AGAINST DEFENDANT JOHN DOE
`
`14,
`
`Alternatively, Plaintiff pleads and would show this Court that the negligent acts
`
`and omissions of the alleged Defendant John Doe and statutory violations, as set out
`
`herein, separately and collectively, may have been the direct and proximate causes of the
`
`accident in question and the resulting injuries and damages sustained and incurred by
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`15.
`
`The statutory violations constitute negligence per se. The violations, negligent acts
`
`and omissions are, among others, as follows:’
`
`a.
`
`Defendant failed to keep the proper lookout as required pursuant
`$545.052(1) of the Tex. Trans. Code Ann.;
`
`to
`
`Defendant failed to sound his horn as required under § 547.501(a) of the
`‘Tex. Trans. Code. Ann.;
`
`failed to drive in a single lane as
`Defendant
`§545.060(a)(1) of the Tex. Trans. Code Ann.;
`
`required pursuant
`
`to
`
`Driver inattention pursuant to § 542.408 of the Tex. Trans. Code Ann.;
`
`Defendant failed to control the speed of the vehicle he was operating in
`compliance with §545.351(b)(1) and §545.351{b)(2) of the Tex. Trans.
`Code Ann.;
`
`PLAINTIFIE’S ORIGINALPETITION-
`
`Page [5
`
`

`

`f.
`
`g.
`
`h,
`
`i.
`
`].
`
`Violating at least Sections 542.301, 545.053(a)(1), 545.351(a) and (bd),
`535.35 1(c)(5), 545.401 (a), and 552.008(2) of the Tex. Trans. Code Ann.;
`
`Defendant failed to maintain an assured distance between his vehicle and
`Plaintiff's vehicle;
`
`Defendant fatled to apply the brakes of his vehicle immediately prior to the
`collision in question;
`
`Defendant failed to timely apply the brakes on her vehicle immediately
`priorto the collision in question; and
`
`Defendant failed to turn his vehicle in order to avoid the collision in
`question.
`
`DEFENDANT JOHN DOE COMMITTED
`
`FELONIOUS ACTS
`
`16.
`
`Defendant John Doe committed an offense when he did not stop or did not comply
`
`with the requirements of §550.021(c) of the Texas Transportation Code.
`
`17.
`
`Defendant John Doe committed a third-degree felony when he left the scene of the
`
`accident and failed to stop and renderaid to the Plaintiffs pursuant to §1.07 of the Texas
`
`Penal Code.
`
`VIEL.
`CAUSES OF ACTION AGAINST TEXAS FARM
`BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiffs re-alleges and incorporate Paragraphs 1-17 herein by reference as if
`
`stated verbatim pursuant to Rule 58 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. At the time
`of the automobile collision in question, Plaintiff was scheduled on an insurance policy
`
`written by Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company. As part of
`
`Plaintiff's automobile policy, Plaintiff was insured against loss for injuries and damages
`
`caused by an uninsured/underinsured motorist at the time of the collision made the basis
`
`of this lawsuit. More specifically, Plaintiff would show that he is a beneficiary underhis
`
`PLAINTIFE’S ORIGINAL PETITIGN-
`
`Page |6
`
`
`
`

`

`policy of insurance issued by Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
`
`Company. Plaintiff is entitled to certain benefits under the uninsured/underinsured and
`
`personal injury protection provisions of the policy of insurance which was issued by
`
`Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company to or for the benefit of
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`19.
`
`Plaintiff would show that as a result of the alleged unknown fleeing driver’s
`
`negligence, Defendant John Doe, Plaintiff sustained and incurred injuries and damages.
`
`VII.
`BAD FAITH OF TEXAS FARM BUREAU
`CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
`
`20.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporate Paragraphs 1-19 herein by referenceas if stated
`
`verbatim pursuant to Rule 58 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant Texas
`
`Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, by and through its employees, agents,
`
`and/or representatives, engaged in bad faith insurance claims handling. Employees,
`
`agents, or servants of Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, and
`
`with Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company’s fuil knowledge and
`
`ratification, refused to tender a fair offer of settlement when liability was reasonably
`
`clear.
`
`BREACH oFTHE DUTY OF
`
`GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING
`
`21.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporates Paragraphs 1-20 herein by reference as if
`
`stated verbatim pursuant to Rule 58 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Texas
`
`law, Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company owes its insured a
`
`duty of good faith and fair dealing. Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Giles, 950 S.W. 48 (Tex.
`
`1997). Due to the special relationship that exists between an insurance company andits
`
`PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page [7
`
`
`
`

`

`insured, an insurance company is liable for breaching its duty of good faith and fair
`
`dealing owed to its insured when an insurance companyfails to attempt in good faith to
`
`effectuate a prompt, fair, and equitable settlement of a claim when the insurer’s liability
`
`is reasonably clear, as it is in this case.
`
`22.
`
`Defendant further breached its duties of good faith and fair dealing by failing and
`
`refusing to comply with Texas laws concerning Plaintiff’s claims. Specifically, the
`
`Texas Legislature enacted Chapter 542 of the Texas Insurance Code also known as the
`
`Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act
`
`to prohibit
`
`insurance companies and their
`
`representatives from engaging in Unfair Claim Settlement Practices. The Act mandates
`
`that “No insurer doing business in this state under the authority, rules and regulations of
`
`this Code shall engage in unfair claim settlement practices.”
`
`23.
`
`In violation of the Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act, Defendant Texas Farm
`
`Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and its agents, employees, and representatives
`
`engaged in prohibited acts and practices including, but not limited to, the following:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`fair, and equitable
`Not attempted in good faith to effect a prompt,
`settlement of a claim in which liability was reasonably clear in violation of
`Sec. 542.003(a) and (b)(3); and
`
`Compelled the policyholder, Gary Holland, to institute a suit to recover an
`amount due undera policy by offering substantially less than the amount
`ultimately recovered in a suit brought by the policyholder in violation of
`Sec. 542.003(a) and (b)(5).
`
`24.
`
`Thus, due to Defendant’s breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing and
`
`Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company’s failure and refusal to pay
`
`Plaintiffs claims, Plaintiff incurred actual damages, including:
`
`a,
`
`b,
`
`Medical expenses; and
`
`Additional interest due to the delay in the paymentofthis claim.
`
`PLAINTIFI’S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page |8
`
`

`

`
`
`25.
`
`In addition, the conduct of Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
`
`Company was committed with malice.’ Further, because Defendant Texas Farm Bureau
`
`Casualty Insurance Company has ratified and approved of the actions of its agents,
`
`adjusters, employees, and representatives, who maliciously and wrongfully denied and
`
`delayed Plaintiff's claims, Plaintiffs are entitled to recover punitive damages.
`
`X,
`BREACH OF CONTRACT
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporates Paragraphs 1-25 herein by reference as if stated
`
`verbatim pursuant to Rule 58 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff and
`
`Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company had a valid and enforceable
`
`contract. Plaintiff performed, tendered performance, or were excused from performing
`
`their contractual obligations.
`
`Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
`
`Company breached the contract. This breach caused Plaintiff injury.
`
`XE.
`VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 541
`OF THE TEXAS INSURANCE CODE
`
`27.
`
`Plaintiff realleges and incorporate Paragraphs 1-26 herein by reference as if stated
`
`verbatim pursuant to Rule 58 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure for this cause of
`
`action against Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company,
`
`
`1 “Malice” means:
`A.
`A specific intent to cause a substantial injury; or
`B.
`An act or omission:
`ti)
`which when viewed objectively from the standpoint of Defendant orits agents,
`employees, or representatives, including, but not limited to, Gary Holland, at the
`time of its occurrence involves an extreme degree of risk, considering the
`probability and magnitude of the potential harm to others; and
`
`{ii)
`
`its agents, employees, or representatives had actual,
`of which Defendant,
`subjective awareness of the risk involved, but nevertheless proceeded with
`conscious indifference to the rights, safety, or welfare ofits insured.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page [9
`
`

`

`28.
`
`The Texas Legislature enacted Chapter 541 of the Texas Insurance Code to
`
`regulate trade practices in the industry of insurance by:
`
`(1) defining or providing for the
`
`determination of trade practices in this state that are unfair methods of compensation or
`
`unfair or deceptive acts or practices; and (2) prohibiting those trade practices. Further,
`
`the legislature made it clear that this Act “shall be liberally construed and applied to
`
`promote its underlying purposes as set forth in this section.” See § 541.008 of the Texas
`
`Insurance Code.
`
`29.
`
`In violation of Chapter 541 of the Texas Insurance Code, Defendant Texas Farm
`
`Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, and the agents, adjusters, employees, or servants
`
`of Defendant Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company knowingly? and
`
`intentionally engaged in unfair methods of compensation and unfair and deceptive acts
`
`or practices in the business of insurance by engaging in UnfairSettlement Practices with
`
`respect to a claim by an insured orbeneficiary, including, but not limited to:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`Misrepresenting to a claimant a material fact or policy provision relating
`to coverageat issue;
`
`Failing to attempt in good faith to effectuate a prompt, fair, and equitable
`settlement of a claim with respect to which the insurer’s liability has
`become reasonably clear;
`
`Failing to provide promptly to a policyholder a reasonable explanation of
`the basis in the policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for the
`insurer’s denial of a claim or offer of a compromise settlement of the
`claim;
`
`Refusing, failing, or unreasonably delaying an offer of settlement under
`applicable first-party coverage on the basis that other coverage may be
`available or that third parties are responsible for the damages suffered,
`expect as may be specifically provided in the policy;
`
`? UnderArticle § 541.002 of the Texas Insurance Code, “Knowingly” means actual awareness ofthe falsity,
`unfairness, or deceptiveness of the act or practice on which a claim under Subchapter D is based. “Actual
`awareness” may be inferred if objective manifestations indicate that a person acted with actual awareness.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page {10
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`€.
`
`f.
`
`Refusing to pay a claim without conducting a reasonable investigation
`with respect to the claim; and
`
`to a Texas personal auto policy, delaying or refusing
`With respect
`settlement of a claim solely because there is other insurance of a different
`type available to satisfy all or part of the loss forming the basis of that
`claim.
`
`XII.
`RELIEF AVAILABLE TO INJURED PARTIES FOR VIOLATIONS
`OF CHAPTER 541 OF THE TEXAS INSURANCE CODE
`
`30.
`
`Pursuant to § 541.151 of the Texas Insurance Code, a person, such as the Plaintiff,
`
`who has sustained actual damages may bring an action against another person for those
`
`damages caused by the other person engaging in an act or practice:
`
`(1) defined by
`
`Subchapter B to be an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or
`
`practice in the business of insurance; or (2) specifically enumerated in Section 17.46(b),
`
`Business & Commerce Code, as an unlawful deceptive trade practice if the person
`
`bringing the action shows that the person relied on the act or practice to the person’s
`
`detriment.
`
`31.
`
`Ina lawsuit filed under Chapter 541, any plaintiff who prevails may obtain:
`
`a,
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`The amount of actual damages plus court costs and reasonable necessary
`attorneys’ fees;
`
`An order enjoining such acts of failure to act complained of; or
`
`Any otherrelief which the Court deems proper; and
`
`On a finding by the trier of fact that the defendants knowingly committed
`the act complained of, the trier of act may award an amount not to exceed
`three times the amount of actual damages.
`
`XII.
`LIABILITY FOR VIOLATION OF THIS SUBCHAPTER
`
`32.
`
`If an insurer that is liable for a claim under an insurance policy is not
`
`in
`
`compliance with this subchapter, the insurer is Hable to pay the holder of the policy or
`
`PLAINTIFF'S OREGINAL PEFITION-
`
`Page [il
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`the beneficiary making the claim under the policy, in addition to the amount of the
`
`claim, interest on the amount of the claim at a rate of 18 percent a year as damages,
`
`together with reasonable attorneys’ fees. Ifa suit is filed, the attorneys’ fees shall be
`
`taxed as part of the costs in the case.
`
`XIV.
`REMEDIES ARE NOT EXCLUSIVE
`
`33.
`
`Further, pursuant to § 54.061 of the Texas Insurance Code, the remedies provided
`
`by this subchapterare in addition to any other remedy or procedure provided by law orat
`
`commonlaw.
`
`XV.
`DAMAGES TO PLAINTIFF
`
`34.
`
`As a result of the incident described herein, Plaintiff incurred reasonable and
`
`necessary medical expenses and, in all reasonable probability, such medical expenses will
`
`continue in the future.
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiff has experienced mental anguish in the past as a result of their physical
`
`injuries and, in all reasonable probability, will sustain mental anguish in the future as a
`
`result of their physical injuries.
`
`36.
`
`Plaintiff has experienced physical pain and suffering in the past as a result of their
`
`physical
`
`injuries, and in all reasonable probability, will sustain physical pain and
`
`suffering in the future as a resuit of their physical injuries.
`37.
`Plaintiffhas experienced physical impairment or physical incapacity in the past as
`
`a result of the incident and, in all reasonable probability, will sustain physical impairment
`
`or physical incapacity in the future.
`
`38.
`
` Asaresult of the above, Plaintiff seeks damages within the jurisdictional limits of
`
`this Court.
`
`PLAINTIFIeS ORIGINAL PETITEON-
`
`Page |12
`
`

`

`
`
`XVI.
`PROPERTY DAMAGE
`
`39.
`
`Plaintiff suffered damage to his vehicle. As a result, Plaintiff incurred losses to his
`
`vehicle, incurred deductible, and diminution in value after any repairs.
`
`40. Asaresult of the above, Plaintiff seeks damages within the jurisdictional limits of
`
`this Court.
`
`XVIL.
`
`CLAIM FOR PREJUDGMENT AND
`POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST
`
`4].
`
`Plaintiff claimsall lawful pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the damages
`
`suffered.
`
`XVIH.
`JURY DEMAND
`
`42,
`
`Plaintiff requests that a jury be convenedto try the factual issues in this cause.
`
`WHEREFORE, PREMISES, CONSIDERED,Plaintiff requests that Defendants
`
`be cited to appear and answer, and that on finaltrial Plaintiff have judgment for actual
`
`damages against the Defendants in a sum within the jurisdictional limits of the Court, the
`
`statutory penalty for Defendants failure to comply with the prompt payment provisions of
`
`Chapter 542 of the Texas Insurance Code; a reasonable sum for attorneys’ fees, as found
`
`by the trier of fact, with conditional sums for the services of Plaintiff's attorneys in the
`
`event of subsequent appeals, exemplary damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment
`
`interest as provided by law, costs of suit; and all other and furtherrelief to which Plaintiff
`
`may be justly entitled at law and in equity.
`
`PLAINTIFE’?S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page [3
`
`

`

`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`HENLEY & HENLEY,P. C.
`
`By: /s/_ Will Smith
`WILL SMITH
`Texas Bar No. 24125048
`wsmith@henleylawpc.com
`GEOFF J. HENLEY
`
`Texas Bar No. 00798253
`ghenley@henleylawpc.com
`2520 Fairmount Street
`Suite 200
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone #: (214) 821-0222
`Facsimile #: (214) 821-0124
`
`ATTORNEYSFOR PLAINTIFF
`
`PLAINTIFF?S ORIGINAL PETITION-
`
`Page |I4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket