throbber
FILED
`11/6/2017 1:21 PM
`JOHN F. WARREN
`COUNTY CLER
`DALLAS COUNT
`
`CC-1 7-O5868—C
`
`CAUSE NO.
`SCOOP HEALTH AND BEAUTY, § IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW
`L.L.P., D/B/A SIGMA LASER MED SPA §
`AND MOHAMMED AL BAGHDAD]

`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`§§§
`
`§ NO.
`V.

`AMJED ALJANABI AND FARAH §
`KASAB
`§ DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
`Defendant.
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ ORIGINAL PETITION
`TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
`NOW COMES Mohammed A1 Baghdadi individually and derivatively 0n behalf 0f
`Scoop Health and Beauty, LLP., d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa hereinafter called Plaintiffs, and file
`this Petition against Amj ed Alj anabi and Farah Kasab, hereinafter called Defendants, and for
`
`cause 0f action shows unto the Court the following:
`
`DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiffs intend this action be conducted pursuant t0 Level 3 of Texas Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 190.
`
`PARTIES AND SERVICE
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi, is an individual resident and domiciliary of
`Collin County, Texas Whose address is 11902 Woodland Way, Frisco, Texas 75035.
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa, is a Texas
`3.
`Limited Liability Partnership authorized to do business in Texas. Plaintiff Sigma Med Laser Spa
`
`is located in Farmers Branch, Dallas County, Texas and authorized to do business in Texas.
`
`4.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi, is an individual, a resident 0f Collin County, Texas
`and may be served with process at 1085 1 Rankin Drive, Frisco, Texas 75035.
`
`5.
`
`Defendant Farah Kasab, is an individual, a resident 0f Collin County, Texas and
`may be served with process at 10851 Rankin Drive, Frisco, Texas 75035.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`The subj ect matter in controversy is within the jurisdictional limits 0f this court.
`
`This court has jurisdiction over the patties because Defendants are Texas
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`residents.
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiffs seek:
`
`a.
`
`monetary relief over $200,000 but no more than $1,000,000.
`
`9.
`
`Venue in Dallas County is proper in this cause under Section 15.002(a)(1) of the
`
`Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code because all or a substantial part of the events or
`
`omissions giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in this county.
`
`CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`10.
`
`Pursuant to Rule 54 of the Texas Rules 0f Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs plead that
`
`all conditions precedent to Plaintiffs’ right t0 obtain the relief requested herein have been
`
`performed or have occurred.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty, LLP, d/b/a Sigma Med Laser Spa is a health
`
`and beauty medical spa located in Dallas County.
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff Mohammed Al Baghdadi and Defendant Amjed Aljanabi entered into a
`
`Partnership Agreement (Exhibit A) dated September 9, 2016 to run a health and beauty medical
`spa. Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi and Defendant Amjed Aljanabi were both collectively
`named as 100% owners of Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa,
`With Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi holding an undivided 50% share thereof and Defendant
`Amjed Aljanabi holding an undivided 50% share.
`
`13.
`
`Defendant Farah Kasab (Amjed Aljanabi’s Wife) was employed full time and was
`responsible providing services t0 customers. Defendant Amjed Aljanabi was responsible for
`
`managing and providing services such as Botox.
`
`14.
`
`While Defendant Amjed Aljanabi was entrusted with the partnership, he and
`Defendant Farah Kasab began operations to open a new Spa location, later named Roz Laser &
`Med Spa. Defendants began sending customers from Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP
`d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa t0 this new location, to the detriment of the Partnership. Defendants
`began canceling appointments at Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med
`Spa and referred such customers t0 the new location. Such acts were in direct Violation of
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Section XXIII the Partnership Agreement signed by Defendant Amjed Aljanabi, which states
`
`that “[n]o partner shall do any act detrimental t0 the interest of the Partnership or any act that
`
`would make it impossible t0 carry 0n the business affairs of the partnership.”
`
`15.
`
`Based 0n recent reports and complaints from customers and social media ads,
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi was holding himself out t0 be a licensed physician, in Violation 0f
`
`both Federal and State law.
`
`Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi asserts the following 0f Defendant Amjed Aljanabi
`
`and Defendant Farah Kasab:
`
`a. Suspicious transactions made by Defendant Amjed Aljanabi;
`
`b. Defendant Amjed Aljanabi was fraudulently representing himself as a Doctor
`
`0r treating physician;
`
`c. Defendants opened a new Spa location, to the detriment of Plaintiff Scoop
`Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa; and
`
`d. Defendants took customers away from Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP
`d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa and referred them to his new location. Defendants stopped showing
`up to their scheduled appointments and Plaintiff Mohammed Al Baghdadi had to over
`
`compensate employees for taking over their appointments.
`
`16.
`
`On May 21, 2017, Defendant Amjed Aljanabi sent Plaintiff Mohammed Al
`Baghdadi a signed and notarized letter of withdrawal from the Partnership (Exhibit B).
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi lists out several reasons as t0 Why he was withdrawing, mainly
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`relating to the work/services of Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi’s sister. On this Withdrawal
`letter, Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi refers to himself as “Dr. Amj ed Alj anabi.”
`
`After multiple disagreements between Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi and
`17.
`Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi, an agreement was proposed for Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi t0
`buy out Defendant Amjed Aljanabi’s undivided 50% share 0f interest 0f Plaintiff Scoop Health
`and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa. However, Defendant Amjed Aljanabi refused t0
`
`sell his share.
`
`18.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi, continues to conduct business at Roz Laser & Med
`Spa, in direct conflict With the Partnership agreement.
`
`Defendant, Amjed Aljanabi, continued t0 engage in conduct that is damaging t0
`19.
`the Partnership by informing customers Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma
`Laser Med Spa was closing and referred them to the new location. Plaintiffs had to seek a
`protection order against Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi has refused to pay any invoices,
`contractual
`20.
`obligations, or payments that Plaintiffs have incurred. Plaintiff Mohammed Al Baghdadi was left
`to cover these expenses himself, amounting to over $40,000. Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi
`
`has since had t0 hire and compensate other employees t0 take over Defendants’ missed
`
`appointments.
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION: BREACH OF COMPANY AGREEMENT
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`21.
`
`Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi incorporates the preceding allegations by
`
`reference.
`
`A fiduciary relationship existed between Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi and
`22.
`Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi.
`
`23.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi, breached his fiduciary duties t0 Plaintiff Mohammed
`
`A1 Baghdadi by the following:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`Defendant Amjed Alj anabi acted against the interests of the Partnership;
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi conspired with Defendant Farah Kasab t0
`
`defraud the partnership and other partner; and
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi and Defendant Farah Kasab opened a similar
`business named Roz Laser & Med Spa without the knowledge of Plaintiff
`Mohammed Al Baghdadi, t0 the detriment of the Partnership.
`
`24.
`
`Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi breached the Partnership Agreement entered into by
`
`PlaintiffMohammed A1 Baghdadi and Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi.
`
`25.
`
`Section XXIII of the Agreement states:
`
`“N0 partner shall do any act detrimental t0 the interest of the Partnership or any
`act that would make it impossible t0 carry 0n the business affairs of the partnership.”
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi’s breach proximately caused injury to Plaintiff
`26.
`Mohammed A1 Baghdadi in excess 0f the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court.
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY TO MOHAMMED
`AL BAGHDADI BY DEFENDANTS
`
`27.
`
`Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi incorporates the preceding allegations by
`
`reference.
`
`A fiduciary relationship existed between Plaintiff Mohammed A1 Baghdadi and
`28.
`Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi and Defendant Farah Kasab.
`
`29.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi, breached his fiduciary duties to Plaintiff Mohammed
`
`A1 Baghdadi by the following:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`Defendant Amjed Alj anabi acted against the interests 0f the Partnership;
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi conspired With Defendant Farah Kasab to
`
`defraud the partnership and other partner; and
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi and Defendant Farah Kasab opened a similar
`business named Roz Laser & Med Spa Without the knowledge of Plaintiff
`Mohammed Al Baghdadi, to the detriment of the Partnership.
`
`30.
`
`Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi breached the Partnership Agreement entered into by
`
`PlaintiffMohammed A1 Baghdadi and Defendant Amj ed Aljanabi.
`
`3 1.
`
`Section XXIII of the Agreement states:
`
`“N0 partner shall do any act detrimental t0 the interest of the Partnership or any
`act that would make it impossible t0 carry 0n the business affairs of the partnership.”
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Defendants’ breach proximately caused injury to Plaintiff Mohammed A1
`32.
`Baghdadi in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court.
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION: BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY TO PLAINTIFF
`SCOOP HEALTH AND BEAUTY LLP D/B/A SIGMA LASER MED SPA
`
`33.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate the preceding allegations by reference.
`
`In his capacity as 50% owner, Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi owed fiduciary duties
`34.
`to Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa, including, but not limited
`
`to, a duty of loyalty and a duty of care.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi breached his fiduciary duties t0 Plaintiff Scoop
`35.
`Health and Beauty, LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa, by acting against the Partnerships interest
`and conspiring with others t0 defraud the Partnership.
`
`Defendant Amj ed Alj anabi acted to the detriment of Plaintiff Scoop Health and
`36.
`Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa and this
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION: FRAUD BY DEFENDANT AMJED JANABI AGAINST
`PLAINTIFFS
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate the preceding allegations by reference.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi made misrepresentations and omissions of material
`
`facts to customers regarding his qualifications t0 offer medical advice and that he was the Doctor
`or treating physician of Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa.
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`a.
`
`b.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi’s represented that he was the Doctor or
`
`treating physician;
`
`At the time Defendant Amjed Aljanabi made this representation, he was
`
`aware that the representation was false 0r, in the alternative, Defendant
`Amjed Aljanabi made these representations Without any regard for their
`
`truth; and
`
`c.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi made the material representation with the
`
`intent that it would be relied upon by customers and at no time did
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi disclose that he was not a medical doctor nor
`
`that he was not authorized t0 practice medicine in the State of Texas.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi opened a second location spa Without the permission
`39.
`and knowledge of Plaintiff Mohammed Al Baghdadi, and to the detriment of Plaintiff Scoop
`Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa.
`
`Plaintiffs have been injured as a direct and proximate result of the foregoing
`40.
`fraud in excess 0f the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court.
`
`FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION: FRAUD BY DEFENDANT AMJED ALJANABI
`UNDER THE TEXAS OCCUPATIONS CODE
`
`41.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate the preceding allegations by reference.
`
`42.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi was holding himself out to be the Doctor or licensed
`
`physician of Scoop Health and Beauty LLP, when in fact, he is not.
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 9
`
`

`

`43.
`
`Section 165.153 of the Texas Occupations Code provides that:
`
`A person commits an offense if the person practices medicine Without a license
`0r permit and causes another:
`
`a.
`
`i. physical or psychological harm; 0r
`
`ii. financial harm
`b. An offense under Subsection (a)(l) is a felony of the third degree
`c. An offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a state jail felony.
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi unlawfully and illegally represented himself to others
`
`44.
`
`as a Doctor or treating physician, in direct conflict with Federal and State law.
`
`FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION: CONSPIRACY
`
`45.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all 0f the preceding paragraphs as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`46.
`
`Defendant are members of a combination of two or more parties. Together,
`
`Defendants combined to accomplish the unlawful act to defraud Plaintiffs.
`
`47.
`
`Defendants had a meeting of the minds to accomplish their common objective.
`
`Defendants accomplished their obj ective through the over act by at least one 0f Defendants.
`
`48.
`
`As a result, Plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount exceeding the minimum
`
`jurisdictional amounts of this Court.
`
`SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION: INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS CONTRACTS
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 10
`
`

`

`49.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all of the receding paragraphs as if fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`50.
`
`The Partnership agreement provided that “N0 partner shall do any act detrimental t0
`the interest 0f the Partnership 0r any act that would make it impossible t0 carry 0n the business
`
`affairs of the partnership.”
`
`51.
`
`Defendant Amjed Aljanabi, by conspiring With Defendant Farah Kasab to open
`
`another Spa location breached his duty t0 not d0 any act detrimental t0 the interest 0f the
`
`Partnership. Furthermore, by cancelling appointments and referring customers away from
`Plaintiff Scoop Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa, Defendants made interfered
`
`With the business affairs of the Plaintiffs.
`
`ATTORNEYS FEES
`
`52.
`
`Defendants’ conduct as described herein and the resulting damage and loss t0
`
`Plaintiffs has necessitated Plaintiffs’ retention of the attorney whose name is subscribed below.
`
`Plaintiffs are, therefore, entitled to recover from Defendants an additional sum to compensate
`
`Plaintiffs for a reasonable fee for such attorneys’ necessary services in the preparation and
`
`prosecution of this action, as well as reasonable fee for any and all necessary appeals to other
`
`courts.
`
`DAMAGES FOR PLAINTIFFS
`
`In addition to the damages incorporated in preceding paragraphs, as a direct and
`53.
`proximate result of the occurrence made the basis of this lawsuit, Plaintiff Mohammed A1
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 11
`
`

`

`Baghdadi, was individually caused to suffer inconvenience and expenses incurred or caused by
`
`the subj ect of this litigation.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the occurrence made the basis 0f this lawsuit,
`54.
`PlaintiffMohammed A1 Baghdadi has incurred the following damages:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Loss of earnings and business in the past;
`
`Loss 0f earning capacity and business which will, in all probability, be
`incurred in the future; and
`
`c.
`
`Incurrence of fees in process of this suit;
`DAMAGES FOR PLAINTIFF SCOOP HEALTH AND BEAUTY, LLP
`In addition t0 the damages incorporated in preceding paragraphs, as a direct and
`
`55.
`
`proximate result of the occurrence made the basis 0f this lawsuit, Plaintiff Scoop Health LLP,
`
`has incurred the following damages:
`
`a.
`
`Loss 0f income;
`
`b.
`
`Loss of opportunity.
`EXEMPLARY DAMAGES
`Defendants’ actions as alleged above were taken with dishonesty of purpose and
`
`56.
`
`intent t0 deceive. Defendants intended to take undue and unconscientious advantage 0f Plaintiff
`Scoop Health and Beauty LLP d/b/a Sigma Laser Med Spa, and Plaintiff Mohammed Al
`
`Baghdadi. Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek that exemplary damages be awarded against Defendants.
`REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE
`
`57.
`
`Plaintiffs request that Defendants disclose each of the items listed in TeX.R.CiV.P.
`
`194.2(a)9-(1) Within 50 (fifty) days of service of Plaintiffs’ Petition.
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 12
`
`

`

`RULE 193.7 NOTICE
`Pursuant to Rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs hereby
`
`58.
`
`give notice to all parties that it intends to use all documents produced in response to written
`
`discovery in any pre-trial hearing and at trial.
`
`PRAYER
`
`WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs
`Defendants gain nothing and for general relief, and that the Court, and after notice and hearing or
`
`pray
`
`the
`
`Court,
`
`that
`
`trial, enters judgment in favor of Plaintiffs, awards Plaintiffs the costs of court, attorney's fees,
`
`pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, actual and consequential damages, punitive damages,
`contractual payments due, and such other and further relief as Plaintiffs may be entitled t0 in law
`
`or in equity.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ALMASRI MARZWANIAN & SEPULVEDA
`LAW GROUP, PLLC
`
`Sam Almasri
`Texas Bar N0. 24053071
`Email: sam@theamslawgroup.com
`9330 LBJ Freeway, Suite 120
`Dallas, Texas 75243
`Tel. (214) 227-2777
`Fax. (214) 227-2271
`Attorney for Plaintiffs
`
`ORIGINAL PETITION
`
`Page 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket