throbber
FILED
`24-0290
`4/15/2024 12:00 AM
`tex-86630918
`SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
`BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
`
`No. ___________
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Supreme Court of Texas
`
`
`IN RE SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND LAUREN
`KRUEGER,
`
`
`
`Relators.
`
`Original Proceeding from the
`444th District Court Cameron County, Texas
`No. 2020-DCL-03939
`Following denial of mandamus relief by
`Thirteenth Court of Appeals at Corpus Christi, Texas
`No. 13-24-00042-CV
`
`RECORD TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
`VOLUME 4 OF 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ROERIG, OLIVEIRA & FISHER LLP
`D. Alan Erwin
`State Bar No. 06653020
`10225 N. 10th Street
`McAllen, TX 78504
`(956) 393-6300
`aerwin@rofllp.com
`
`Counsel for Relator Lauren Elizabeth
`Krueger
`
`
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`William R. Peterson
`State Bar No. 24065901
`william.peterson@morganlewis.com
`Michelle D. Pector
`State Bar No. 24027726
`michelle.pector@morganlewis.com
`Jared Wilkerson
`State Bar No. 24084096
`jared.wilkerson@morganlewis.com
`1000 Louisiana, Suite 4000
`Houston, Texas 77002
`(713) 890-5000
`(713) 890-5001 (Fax)
`
`ROERIG, OLIVEIRA & FISHER LLP
`David Oliveira
`
`State Bar No. 15254675
`10225 N. 10th Street
`McAllen, TX 78504
`(956) 393-6300
`doliveira@rofllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Relator Space Exploration
`Technologies Corp.
`
`
`
`

`

`INDEX OF RECORD TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
`
`Tab No. Page No.
`
`Description
`
`Record to Petition for Writ of Mandamus before
`Court of Appeals
`
`Petition for Writ of Mandamus before Court of
`Appeals
`
`1/11/2024
`
` MR2257
`
`Order Setting Mandamus Response Deadlines
`
`Date Filed
`
`1/11/2024
`
`1/12/2024
`
`1/16/2024
`
`1/22/2024
`
`1/22/2024
`
`1/23/2024
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
` MR0001
`
` MR2193
`
` MR2259
`
` MR2261
`
`6
`
` MR2266
`
`7
`
` MR2271
`
`8
`
`9
`
` MR2276
`
` MR2284
`
`10
`
` MR2289
`
`11
`
` MR2296
`
`Appearance of Counsel Sarah Durham for Hector
`Garcia, Jr.
`
`Real Party in Interest Hector Garcia, Jr.’s First
`Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to
`Petition for Writ of Mandamus
`
`Real Parties in Interest Jose Ruiz and Humberto
`Garcia’s First Motion for Extension of Time to file
`Response to Mandamus Petition
`
`Real Party in Interest Hector Garcia, Jr.’s Amended
`First Motion for Extension of Time to file Response
`to Petition for Writ of Mandamus
`
`Real Parties in Interest Jose Ruiz and Humberto
`Garcia’s Motion to Abate
`
`2/14/2024
`
`Real Party in Interest Hector Garcia, Jr.’s Response
`to Real Parties in Interest Jose Ruiz and Humberto
`Garcia’s Motion to Abate
`
`Real Party in Interest Hector Garcia, Jr.’s Second
`Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to
`Mandamus Petition
`
`Real Parties in Interest Jose Ruiz and Humberto
`Garcia’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to file
`Response to Mandamus Petition
`
`2/16/2024
`
`2/21/2024
`
`2/21/2024
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
` MR2304
`
`Relators’ Response to Second Motions for Extension
`
`2/21/2024
`
` MR2311
`
`Relators’ Response to Motion to Abate
`
` MR2321
`
`Real Parties in Interest Jose Ruiz and Humberto
`Garcia’s Reply in Support of Motion to Abate
`
`15
`
` MR2330
`
`Real Parties in Interest Jose Ruiz and Humberto
`Garcia’s Amended Reply in Support of Motion to
`Abate
`
`2/26/2024
`
`3/07/2024
`
`3/08/2024
`
`16
`
` MR2339
`
`Real Party in Interest Hector Garcia, Jr.’s Agreement
`to Real Parties in Interest Jose Ruiz and Humberto
`
`3/08/2024
`
`
`
`

`

`17
`
` MR2344
`
`18
`
` MR2346
`
`19
`
` MR2348
`
`20
`
` MR2350
`
`21
`
` MR2386
`
`22
`
` MR2387
`
`23
`
` MR2388
`
`24
`
` MR2389
`
`25
`
` MR2390
`
`26
`
` MR2391
`
`27
`
` MR2392
`
`28
`
` MR2393
`
`29
`
` MR2394
`
`Garcia’s Amended Reply in Support of Motion to
`Abate
`
`Letter Brief to Trial Court in Support of Opposition
`to Motion for New Trial, SpaceX’s Bill of Costs and
`Submission of Proposed Order Denying Motion for
`New Trial
`
`12/13/2023
`
`Defendants’ Proposed Order Denying Jose Ruiz and
`Humberto Garcia’s Motion for New Trial
`
`12/13/2023
`
`Service of Relators’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus
`to Judge Sanchez
`
`Master Index to the Court Reporter’s Record,
`Volume 1 of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying transcription
`of the July 31, 2023 Voir Dire proceedings from the
`Trial on the Merits, Volume 2 of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying transcription
`of the August 1, 2023 proceedings from the Trial on
`the Merits, Volume 3 of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying transcription
`of the August 2, 2023 proceedings from the Trial on
`the Merits, Volume 4 of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying transcription
`of the August 3, 2023 proceedings from the Trial on
`the Merits, Volume 5 of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying transcription
`of the August 4, 2023 proceedings from the Trial on
`the Merits, Volume 6 of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying Plaintiffs’
`trial exhibits from the Trial on the Merits, Volume 7
`of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying Plaintiffs’
`trial exhibits from the Trial on the Merits, Volume 8
`of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying Plaintiffs’
`trial exhibits from the Trial on the Merits, Volume 9
`of 11
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying Defendants’
`trial exhibits from the Trial on the Merits, Volume
`10 of 11
`
`1/12/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`1/18/2024
`
`
`
`

`

`30
`
` MR2395
`
`31
`
` MR2396
`
`Certificate of Court Reporter certifying Defendants’
`trial exhibits from the Trial on the Merits, Volume
`11 of 11
`
`Declaration of Michelle Pector Authenticating the
`Contents of the Record and Appendix
`
`
`
`1/18/2024
`
`4/12/2024
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IZ, JOSE L
`1963
`
`* Consents - Auth (Verified) *
`
`01031564
`11465528
`
`™,
`
`POOR
`DISCLOSURE AND CONSENT
`Medical, Surgical and Diagnostic Procedures
`a
`(Page 4 of2) s
`:
`DSose 4
`|
`f ) Uiz
`EEN
`TO THE PATIENT: You havethe right, as a patient, to be informed about your condition and the recommended surgical,
`medical ordiagnosticprocedure to be usedso thatyou may makethe decision whether ornot to undergo theprocedure after
`knowingthe risks and hazards involved. This disclosure is not meant to scare oralarm you, itis simply an effort to make you
`better informed so you may give or withhold your consentto the procedure.
`we)voluntarily request Dr.
`‘
`‘as my physician, and such associates, technical assistants and other health care providers as they may deem necessary, to treat my
`condition which has been explained to me as:hhh:eh
`| }we) understandthatthe following surgical, medical and/ordiagnostic procedures are planned for me anfihwe)voluntarily consent
`
`QUALIT,
`
`ORIGIN,L
`
`
`
`and authorize these procedures:
`
`‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`we) understand that my physician may discover otheror different conditions which require additionalordifferent procedures than
`ase planned{|\we) authorize my physician, and such associates, technical assistants and other health care providers to perform
`such other procedures whichare advisablein their professional judgment.
`ACAwe) éo)(do not) consenttotheuse ofblood and blood products as deemed necessary.
`(wey understand that no warrantyor guarantee has been madeto me asto result or cure.
`(Dhwey consentto the disposal by hospital authorities of any tissues or parts which may be removed.
`Just as there may be risks and hazardsin continuing my present condition without treatment, there are also risks and hazards related
`to the performanceofthe surgical, medical, and/or diagnostic procedures planned for me(|(we)realize that commonto surgical,
`medical, and/or diagnostic proceduresis the potentialfor infection, blood clots in veins and lungs, hemorrhage,allergic reactions, and
`even death(Nwe) also realize that the following risks and hazards may occur in connection with this particular procedure:
`
`
`
`
`(IS uyTe
`es
`os
`Se)
`conn
`h IDHRHealth
`nia 01031564
`11465528
`MV
`ed
`MR: O1
`‘
`RUIZ. JOSE L
`We OBSERVATION (0Ya Male
`POOR QUALITY eater
`oa/t4i2
`oeeiiERO,GUILLERNO Phy: PECHERO, GUILLERNO
`i
`OUTPA]
`;
`Phy:PEC
`K
`mea
`iNOC DSR-ADM-01 (12/18) Pg.1 of15,
`
`|
`
`|
`
`+
`
`
`
`A
`LL
`
`ERMO
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Defendant's Exhibit
`170 pages of 255
`
`
`MR2032
`
`Defendant's Exhibit
`
`170
`
`MR2032
`
`€
`

`

`RUIZ, JOSE L
`3/9/1963
`
`. )
`
`* Consents - Auth (Verified) *
`
`DISCLOSURE AND CONSENT
`
`01031564
`11465528
`
`Medical, Surgical and Diagnostic Procedures
`(Page 2 of2)
`(do not) consentto the photographing ofthe operations or procedures to be performed, including appropriate
`JILRAwe)
`portions of my bouy, for medical, scientific or educational purposes, providing my identity is not revealed by descriptive texts
`accompanying the pictures.
`we) o\do Not) agree to the possible presence ofa scientific observerin the operating room during my surgical care should
`my surgeon
`make Such a request!
`|we) understand that said observeris not in any way associated with Doctors Hospital at
`Renaissance(!
`{we) hereby relea
`octors Hospital at Renaissance,its agents, assigns and successors from anyandallliability which
`mayresult from
`presence of a scientific observer in the operating room.
`we) understand that anesthesia involves additional risks and hazanis bute) request the use of anesthetics forthe relief and
`rotection from pain during the planned and additional procedures.(l
`(we) understand the anesthesia may have to be changed possibly
`without explanation to
`(us).
`
`we) understandthat certain complications may result from the use of any anesthetic including respiratory problems, drug reaction,
`aralysis, brain damage or even death. Otherrisks,and hazards which mayresult from the use of general anesthetics range from minor
`discomfort to injury to vocal cords, teeth or eyes.(|
`(we) understandthat other risks and hazards resulting from spinal or epidural
`anesthetics.include headache and chronic pain.
`{ L Ke (i }we) have been given an opportunity to ask questions about my condition, alternative forms of an
`ia and treatment,
`risks of non- treatment, the proceduresto be used,the risks and hazardsinvolved, and benefits oftreatment, and
`) believe th
`(we) havesufficient information to give this informed consent.
`.
`|{we) certify this form has beenfully explained to me, thaiwe) have readit or have hadit read to (fefus), that the blank spaces have
`een filled in, and th
`) understandits contents.
`Patient Signature:
` Witness Signature:
`
`:
`
`time: A5Y___amipm
`Date: 2-9-
`Date: > F a Time:
`Hi5 7
`AM/PM
`
`
`
`Other Legally Responsible Party Signature:CCC atte:
`
`Time:
`
`:
`
`AM/PM
`
`
`
`Relationshipto Patient: - Address/City / State / Zip:
`
`Prior to the treatmentor procedure, the nurse or designeewill verify the patient's consent and signature:
`
`(Patient Signatire:
`Witness Signature:
`
`Z
`
`_\ ji Ron. S Ain wie} Lar
`
`Date: only les
`Date:
`
`Time:
`Time:
`
`PM
`PM
`
`mployee PHYSICIAN:
`
`/Read/Translated to Patient by
`
`ge
`
`3ED
`Ble
`
`ERIDHRHealth
`
`p
`
`ors Hospita
`
` A
`
`a 528
`sO
`MR: 01031564
`1465
`
`R RUIZ,99800:00 UNKNOWN, ROOM-UNKNOWE
`A Shae
`sere,RD RPhy:PEC!
`0, GUILLERMO
`Oi
`Phy:PECHERO, GUILLE!
`Pl
`
`DSR-ADM-01 (12/18) Pg.20f13
`
`Page 2 of 4
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Page6 of 255
`
`MR2033
`
`MR2033
`
`

`

`¥ 2/16/2023 07:14
`
`€19563621918
`
`Doctor's Hospital at Renalssan
`
`RRD~ 19566866817
`
`2/4
`
`
`
` itp
`;okLae Hom::5501S.McCollRoad
`! Doctors Hospital at Renaissance
`ey bérors
`ItyieARENAISSANGE.Edinburg, TX 78539
`
`05:50 CST
`2/14/2023
`Admit Date/Time:
`Patient Name: RUIZ, JOSEL
`15:40 CST
`2/15/2023
`Discharge Date/Time:
`MRN;
`01031564
`PECHERO MD,GUILLERMO RUBEN
`Admitting:
`VID:
`11465528
`PECHERO MD,GUILLERMO RUBEN
`
`DOB/Age/Sex. FM} «959 years=Male Referring:
`Location:
`Doctors Hospital at Renalssance
`NT 2nd MS
`213
`
`
`Progress Notes
`
`DOCUMENT TYPE:
`SERVICE DATE/TIME:
`RESULT STATUS:
`AUTHORIZEDBY:
`
`Progress Note
`2/15/2023 07:58 CST
`Auth (Verified)
`Barron,Eleaine PA-C (2/15/2023 07:59 CST)
`
`Subjective
`Patient is a 59 year old male presenting to our clinic with severe LEFT knee pain due ta
`advanced osteoarthritis. Afier trying andfailing conservative treatmentincluding 1A knee
`injection, PT end oral medications, it was
`recommended to continue with LEFT TKA. Patient underwent LEFT total knee
`arthroplasty 2/14/23. They are presenting well today post-operatively. They are
`ambulating well, managing pain well, managing diet well and voiding. Nofever. chilis or
`drainage from the incision site. Per nursing staff, no acute events were nated
`vi
`negative except per HPI
`
`Objective
`Vitals/Measurements
`T: 98.5 °F (Oral) HR: 62 (Peripheral) RR: 17 BP: 120/62 SpO2; 94%
`
`PRRUEESS £ {npatient
`
`PhysicalExam
`Objective:
`LEFT LE: No soaking of dressing noted. No warmth, erythema, purulent discharge or
`drainage noted. No signs of active infection at this time. Grossly neurovascularly intact.
`Soft compartment noted upon palpation. No pain with passive stretch. Limited ROM
`secondary to pain as can be expected. No tendemess along gastroc. Negative Homans
`testing. Able to ambulate with assistive devices.
`
`Procedure
`LEFT total knee arthroplasty
`
`Assessment/Pian
`Assessment/Plan:
`1, Continue WBATwith assistive devices and proceed with PT as recommended. Is
`already scheduled to start PT.
`2. Continue pain management as needed and antibiotics as recommended. Aware to
`get RX upon discharge,
`3. DVT prophylaxis with ASA 81mg BID, compression stockings and ambulatory status.
`4. May discharge once medicallystable today with family
`§. F/u outpatient in 2 weeks at clinic for wound check and X-
`
`Ca
`:
`Tee 11,07
`
`E
`
`second Sa
`cst
`INR
`oanneas12:2:
`
`acetaminophen, 650 mg=2tab, Oral. q6h
`aspirin, 81 mg= 1 tab, Oral, BID
`CeleBREX, 200 mg= 1 cap, Oral, BID
`Colace, 100 mg= 1 cap. Oral, 8ID
`
`Report Request ID:
`
`116728463
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`2/16/2023 07:03 CST
`
`Page 3 of 4
`Page3 of 4
`
`MR2034
`
`MR2034
`
`

`

`Page 4 of 4
`
`ee
`Page 4 of 4
`
`MR2035
`
`

`

`CAUSE NO. 2020-DCL-03939
`
`JOSE RUIZ; HECTOR GARCIA, JR.;
`AND HUMBERTO GARCIA
`
`IN THE DISTRICT COURT
`
`v .
`
`CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`SPACE EXPLORATION
`TECHNOLOGIES CORP. D/B/A SPACEX;
`LAUREN ELIZABETH KRUEGER
`
`444TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`CHARGE OF THE COURT
`
`MEMBERS OF THE JURY:
`
`After the closing arguments, you will go to the jury room to decide the case, answer the
`questions that are attached, and reach a verdict. You may discuss the case with other jurors only
`when you are all together in the jury room.
`
`Remember my previous instructions: Do not discuss the case with anyone else, either in
`person or by any other means. Do not do any independent investigation about the case or conduct
`any research. Do not look up any words in dictionaries or on the Internet. Do not post information
`about the case on the Internet. Do not share any special knowledge or experiences with the other
`jurors. Do not use your phone or any other electronic device during your deliberations for any
`reason. I will give you a number where others may contact you in case of an emergency.
`
`Any notes you have taken are for your own personal use. You may take your notes back
`into the jury room and consult them during deliberations, but do not show or read your notes to
`your fellow jurors during your deliberations. Your notes are not evidence. Each of you should rely
`on your independent recollection of the evidence and not be influenced by the fact that another
`juror has or has not taken notes.
`
`You must leave your notes with the bailiff when you are not deliberating. The bailiff will
`give your notes to me promptly after collecting them from you. I will make sure your notes are
`kept in a safe, secure location and not disclosed to anyone. After you complete your deliberations,
`the bailiff will collect your notes. When you are released from jury duty, the bailiff will promptly
`destroy your notes so that nobody can read what you wrote.
`
`Here are the instructions for answering the questions:
`
`1. Do not let bias, prejudice, or sympathy play any part in your decision.
`
`2. Base your answers only on the evidence admitted in court and on the law that is in these
`instructions and questions. Do not consider or discuss any evidence that was not admitted
`in the courtroom.
`
`MR2036
`
`

`

`3. You are to make up your own minds about the facts. You are the sole judges of the
`credibility of the witnesses and the weight to give their testimony. But on matters of law,
`you must follow all of my instructions.
`
`4. If my instructions use a word in a way that is different from its ordinary meaning, use the
`meaning I give you, which will be a proper legal definition.
`
`5. All the questions and answers are important. No one should say that any question or answer
`is not important.
`
`6. Answer "yes" or "no" to all questions unless you are told otherwise. A "yes" answer must
`be based on a preponderance of the evidence. Whenever a question requires an answer
`other than "yes" or "no," your answer must be based on a preponderance of the evidence.
`
`The term "preponderance of the evidence" means the greater weight of credible evidence
`presented in this case. If you do not find that a preponderance of the evidence supports a
`"yes" answer, then answer "no." A preponderance of the evidence is not measured by the
`number of witnesses or by the number of documents admitted in evidence. For a fact to be
`proved by a preponderance of the evidence, you must find that the fact is more likely true
`than not true.
`
`7. Do not decide who you think should win before you answer the questions and then just
`answer the questions to match your decision. Answer each question carefully without
`considering who will win. Do not discuss or consider the effect your answers will have.
`
`8. Do not answer questions by drawing straws or by any method of chance.
`
`9. Some questions might ask you for a dollar amount. Do not agree in advance to decide on a
`dollar amount by adding up each juror's amount and then figuring the average.
`
`10. Do not trade your answers. For example, do not say, "I will answer this question your way
`if you answer another question my way."
`
`11. The answers to the questions must be based on the decision of at least ten of the twelve
`jurors. The same ten jurors must agree on every answer. Do not agree to be bound by a
`vote of anything less than ten jurors, even if it would be a majority.
`
`As I have said before, if you do not follow these instructions, you will be guilty of juror
`misconduct, and I might have to order a new trial and start this process over again. This would
`waste your time and the parties' money, and would require the taxpayers of this county to pay for
`another trial. If a juror breaks any of these rules, tell that person to stop and report it to me
`immediately.
`
`INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS
`
`You are instructed that the "occurrence in question" refers to the event which occurred on
`Boca Chica Boulevard in Brownsville, Cameron County, Texas on the morning of February 5,
`2020.
`
`"SpaceX" means Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
`
`MR2037
`
`

`

`QUESTION ONE:
`
`Did the negligence, if any, of Lauren Elizabeth Krueger proximately cause the occurrence in
`question?
`
`"Negligence" means failure to use ordinary care, that is, failing to do that which a person
`of ordinary prudence would have done under the same or similar circumstances or doing
`that which a person of ordinary prudence would not have done under the same or similar
`circumstances.
`
`"Ordinary care" means that degree of care that would be used by a person of ordinary
`prudence under the same or similar circumstances.
`
`"Proximate cause" means a cause that was a substantial factor in bringing about an
`occurrence, and without which cause such occurrence would not have occurred. In order
`to be a proximate cause, the act or omission complained of must be such that a person using
`ordinary care would have foreseen that the occurrence, or some similar occurrence, might
`reasonably result therefrom. There may be more than one proximate cause of an
`occurrence.
`
`Answer, "YES" or "NO":
`
`Answer:
`
`MR2038
`
`

`

`If you answered "YES" with respect to Question One, then answer the remaining questions.
`Otherwise do not answer the remaining questions.
`
`QUESTION TWO:
`
`At the time of the occurrence in question, was Lauren Elizabeth Krueger acting in the course and
`scope of her employment with SpaceX?
`
`An employee is not in the course and scope of employment while driving a vehicle to and
`from work unless the employee is on a "special mission." An employee is on a "special mission"
`if the employee is performing a specific errand either as part of her regular duties or at the specific
`order of her employer or implied approval. An employee may or may not be on a "special mission"
`if the employee is staying and working at a location away from home. Whether an employer
`owned or paid for a vehicle being driven by the employee is not relevant to whether the employee
`was acting in the course and scope of her employment. A special mission involves work or a work-
`related activity apart from the employee's regular job duties. If on a special mission, the employee
`is within the course and scope of employment until the mission is complete or until the employee
`deviates from the mission for personal reasons.
`
`Answer "Yes"
`
`Answer:
`
`• or N6
`
`MR2039
`
`

`

`QUESTION THREE:
`
`What sum of money, if paid now in cash, would fairly and reasonably compensate Jose Ruiz for
`his injuries, if any, that resulted from the occurrence in question?
`
`Consider the elements of damages listed below and none other. Consider each element
`separately. Do not award any sum of money on any element if you have otherwise, under
`some other element, awarded a sum of money for the same loss. That is, do not compensate
`twice for the same loss, if any. Do not include interest on any damages you find.
`
`Do not include any amount for any injury or condition that did not result from the
`occurrence in question. However, if a pre-existing injury or condition was not causing any
`symptoms at the time of the occurrence in question, but made the Plaintiff more susceptible
`to injury than a person without that injury or condition, include damages, if any, resulting
`from a combination of the preexisting injury or condition and the occurrence in question.
`
`Do not include any amount for any condition resulting from the failure, if any, of Jose Ruiz
`to have acted as a person of ordinary prudence would have done under the same or similar
`circumstances in caring for and treating his injuries, if any, that resulted from the
`occurrence in question.
`
`Answer separately, in dollars and cents, for damages, if any. Any recovery will be
`determined by the court when it applies the law to your answers at the time of judgment.
`
`1.
`
`Physical pain and mental anguish sustained in the past.
`
`Answer: $ S L I OD° • -53
`
`2.
`
`Physical pain and mental anguish that, in reasonable probability Jose Ruiz will sustain in
`the future.
`
`3.
`
`Physical impairment sustained in the past.
`
`Answer: $
`Answer: $ Z2.../ COD. ° C)
`
`4.
`
`Physical impairment that, in reasonable probability, Jose Ruiz will sustain in the future.
`
`Answer: $ 15--; COO .-Qfr
`
`MR2040
`
`

`

`QUESTION FOUR:
`
`What sum of money, if paid now in cash, would fairly and reasonably compensate Humberto
`Garcia for his injuries, if any, that resulted from the occurrence in question?
`
`Consider the elements of damages listed below and none other. Consider each element
`separately. Do not award any sum of money on any element if you have otherwise, under
`some other element, awarded a sum of money for the same loss. That is, do not compensate
`twice for the same loss, if any. Do not include interest on any damages you find.
`
`Do not include any amount for any injury or condition that did not result from the
`occurrence in question. However, if a pre-existing injury or condition was not causing any
`symptoms at the time of the occurrence in question, but made Humberto Garcia more
`susceptible to injury than a person without that injury or condition, include damages, if
`any, resulting from a combination of the preexisting injury or condition and the occurrence
`in question.
`
`Do not include any amount for any condition resulting from the failure, if any, of Humberto
`Garcia to have acted as a person of ordinary prudence would have done under the same or
`similar circumstances in caring for and treating his injuries, if any, that resulted from the
`occurrence in question.
`
`Answer separately, in dollars and cents, for damages, if any. Any recovery will be
`determined by the court when it applies the law to your answers at the time of judgment.
`
`1.
`
`Physical pain and mental anguish sustained in the past.
`
`Answer: $
`
`IC/ 6G0 .
`
`2.
`
`Physical pain and mental anguish that, in reasonable probability Humberto Garcia will
`sustain in the future.
`
`Answer: $ ZOf O(X) . Oa
`
`3.
`
`Physical impairment sustained in the past.
`
`Answer: $ <
`
`(X)0, tr' °
`
`4.
`
`Physical impairment that, in reasonable probability, Humberto Garcia will sustain in the
`future.
`
`Answer: $
`
`4)C0
`
`MR2041
`
`

`

`QUESTION FIVE:
`
`What sum of money, if paid now in cash, would fairly and reasonably compensate Hector Garcia,
`Jr. for his injuries, if any, that resulted from the occurrence in question?
`
`Consider the elements of damages listed below and none other. Consider each element
`separately. Do not award any sum of money on any element if you have otherwise, under
`some other element, awarded a sum of money for the same loss. That is, do not compensate
`twice for the same loss, if any. Do not include interest on any damages you find.
`
`Do not include any amount for any injury or condition that did not result from the
`occurrence in question. However, if a pre-existing injury or condition was not causing any
`symptoms at the time of the occurrence in question, but made Hector Garcia more
`susceptible to injury than a person without that injury or condition, include damages, if
`any, resulting from a combination of the preexisting injury or condition and the occurrence
`in question.
`
`Do not include any amount for any condition resulting from the failure, if any, of Hector
`Garcia, Jr. to have acted as a person of ordinary prudence would have done under the same
`or similar circumstances in caring for and treating his injuries, if any, that resulted from
`the occurrence in question.
`
`Answer separately, in dollars and cents, for damages, if any. Any recovery will be
`determined by the court when it applies the law to your answers at the time of judgment.
`
`1.
`
`Physical pain and mental anguish sustained in the past.
`
`Answer: $
`
`2.
`
`Physical pain and mental anguish that, in reasonable probability Hector Garcia, Jr. will
`sustain in the future.
`Answer: $ lota:o.o°
`
`3.
`
`Physical impairment sustained in the past.
`
`Answer: $
`
`0
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Physical impairment that, in reasonable probability, Hector Garcia, Jr. will sustain in the
`future.
`Answer: $ 0
`
`Medical care expenses that, in reasonable probability, Hector Garcia, Jr. will sustain in
`the future.
`
`Answer: $ •
`
`MR2042
`
`

`

`Presiding Juror:
`
`1. When you go into the jury room to answer the questions, the first thing you will need to
`do is choose a presiding juror.
`
`2. The presiding juror has these duties:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`e.
`f.
`
`have the complete charge read aloud if it will be helpful to your
`deliberations;
`preside over your deliberations, meaning manage the discussions, and see
`that you follow these instructions;
`give written questions or comments to the bailiff who will give them to the
`judge;
`write down the answers you agree on
`get the signatures for the verdict certificate; and
`notify the bailiff that you have reached a verdict.
`
`Do you understand the duties of the presiding juror? If you do not, please tell me now.
`
`Instructions for Signing the Verdict Certificate:
`
`You may answer the questions on a vote of ten jurors. The same ten jurors must
`1.
`agree on every answer in the charge. This means you may not have one group of ten jurors agree
`on one answer and a different group of ten jurors agree on another answer.
`
`If ten jurors agree on every answer, those ten jurors sign the verdict. If eleven
`2.
`jurors agree on every answer, those eleven jurors sign the verdict. If all twelve of you agree on
`every answer, you are unanimous and only the presiding juror signs the verdict.
`
`All jurors should deliberate on every question. You may end up with all twelve
`3.
`of you agreeing on some answers, while only ten or eleven of you agree on other answers. But
`when you sign the verdict, only those ten who agree on every answer will sign the verdict.
`
`Do you understand these instructions? If not, please tell me now.
`
`GE PRESIDING
`
`l e(o'clock
`FILED
`LAURA PEREZ-REYES - !STRICT CLERK
`
`AUG - 4 2023
`
`DISTRICT COURT OF CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`B A,0ktole-
`
`puty
`
`MR2043
`
`

`

`Verdict Certificate
`
`Our verdict is unanimous. All twelve of us have agreed to ach and every answer. The
`presiding juror has signed the certificate for all skeof us.
`
`PRESIDI G
`
`0
`
`OfiV\SkikACk_ OCti c,
`
`Printed Name of Presiding Juror
`
`Our verdict is not unanimous. Eleven of us have agreed to each and every answer and
`
`have signed the certificate below.
`
`Our verdict is not unanimous. Ten of us have agreed to each and every answer and have
`
`signed the certificate below.
`
`Jurors' Si ma es
`
`Jurors' Printed Names
`
`ICILN nAipioL
`
`r
`
`
`
`efel 41 11 a ytier
`-i'scI la 0 l i vcu-12—
`ir\kavi'(k. CA-i), -6(14k avides
`. 51et,--1,0
`I) ):;_ 2-- 1 — cA
`g/ri jac 6://nglob
`
`-1Y1OJL
`
`j5(
`
`SOT) oti
`
`t_ 0 Pt -7
`
`71J,
`
`(3
`
`ecTorks
`
`FILED ( f' Oo'clock
`LAUHA PEHEZ-REYS - ItTRICT CLERK
`
`AUG -4 2023
`
`DISTRICT COURT
`COURT OF CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`Deputy
`
`MR2044
`
`

`

`RECEIVED 9/18/2023 6:22 PM
`2020-DCL-03939 / 79679892
`LAURA PEREZ-REYES
`Cameron County District Clerk
`By Brenda Ramirez Deputy Clerk
`
`CAUSE NO. 2020-DCL-03939
`
`Plaintiffs,
`

`JOSE RUIZ, HECTOR GARCIA, JR.

`And HUMBERTO GARCIA

`

`

`

`

`

`SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES
`CORP. d/b/a SPACEX, LAUREN ELIZABETH §
`KRUEGER

`
`
`v.
`
`IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
`
`444TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`
`
`
`On July 31, 2023, this matter was called for trial before a jury of twelve persons duly
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`impaneled and sworn. The Plaintiffs are Jose Ruiz, Humberto Garcia, and Hector Garcia Jr.
`
`(collectively “Plaintiffs”) and the Defendants are Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
`
`(“SpaceX”) and Lauren Elizabeth Krueger (“Krueger”).
`
`Trial of this matter occurred from July 31–August 4, 2023. After all parties rested, the jury
`
`returned its verdict in this matter on August 4, 2023. The Court received, filed, and entered the
`
`jury’s verdict of record. The questions submitted to the jury and the jury’s findings are attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit 1 hereto. After the jury was released, Defendants move for judgment based on
`
`the verdict. Having considered the motion and all related materials, the Court enters Final
`
`Judgment as follows:
`
`1. In light of the jury’s finding that Krueger was not in the course and scope of her
`
`employment with SpaceX and not on a special mission at the time of the accident
`
`at issue, all of Plaintiffs’ claims against SpaceX are denied in their entirety, a take-
`
`nothing judgment is rendered in favor of SpaceX, and Plaintiffs shall recover
`
`nothing against or from SpaceX.
`
`
`
`MR2045
`
`

`

`2. Plaintiffs are awarded the following damages against Krueger:
`
`a. Jose Ruiz: $73,500 ($58,500 of which is subject to 8.25% prejudgment
`
`interest from April 12, 2021 until the day prior to this Final Judgment);
`
`b. Humberto Garcia: $40,000 ($20,000 of which is subject to 8.25%
`
`prejudgment interest from April 12, 2021 until the day prior to this Final
`
`Judgment); and
`
`c. Hector Garcia: $10,000 (none of which is subject to prejudgment interest).
`
`3. Postjudgment interest for the amounts in paragraphs 2(a)–2(c) and 4 will accrue at
`
`8.25% and will cease accruing once payment of such amounts are made in full.
`
`4. The Court finds that SpaceX is the successful party as against Plaintiffs, per Texas
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 131, and orders that Plaintiffs shall pay SpaceX all taxable
`
`costs, consisting of all fees of the clerk, all service fees, interpreter fees, and all fees
`
`of the court reporters for the original stenographic deposition, hearing, and trial
`
`transcripts and exhibits obtained for use in the suit. The amount of taxable costs to
`
`which SpaceX is entitled from Plaintiffs is $40,252.33.
`
`5. The Court finds that neither any of Plaintiffs nor Krueger are a successful party
`
`under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 131. Accordingly, each of Plaintiffs and
`
`Krueger shall bear their own costs.
`
`
`
`This is a Final Judgment on all claims and as to all parties in this case. All relief not granted
`
`herein is DENIED.
`
`SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED this ___ day of ______________, 2023.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket