`
`FILEr
`
`NOV 0 32022
`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT CLERK
`WEB
`ffiIGi OF TEXAS
`BY
`
`DPUt.1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`GRANDE COMMUNICATIONS
`NETWORKS LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`No. l:17-cv-00365
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`We, the jury in the above-captioned action, answer the questions submitted to us as
`
`follows:
`
`1.
`
`Did the plaintiffs prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Grande is
`contributorily liable for copyright infringement?
`
`Answer:
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`If you answered "YES" to Question], answer Questions 2-5.
`
`Ifyou answered "NO" to Question 1, DO NOT answer any more questions. Sign and return your
`verdict form.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`What is the number of copyrighted works for which the plaintiffs have proved
`that Grande is liable for statutory damages?
`
`Answer:
`
`If you answered "yes" to Question 1, did the plaintiffs prove by a preponderance
`of the evidence that Grande's contributory infringement was willful?
`
`Answer:
`
`Yes V' No
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00365-DAE Document 458 Filed 11/03/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`4.
`
`If you answered "yes" to Question 1 and "no" to Question 3, did Grande prove by
`a preponderance of the evidence that Grande's contributory infringement was
`innocent?
`
`Answer:
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`If Innocent
`If Not Innocent
`and Not Willful
`If Willful
`
`You must award damages between $200 and $30,000 per work infringed.
`You must award damages between $750 and $30,000 per work infringed.
`
`You must award damages between $750 and $150,000 per work infringed.
`
`5. What is the total amount of statutory damages you award to Plaintiffs in this case?
`$_1o,7(a,2°°.OQ
`
`TOTAL STATUTORY DAMAGES
`
`Please sign and return the verdict form.
`
`Jury Foreperson
`
`ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
`REDACTED PURSUANT TO
`0VEINMENT ACT OF 2002
`C'-
`
`Date
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
