throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 1 of 7
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`CASE NO. 1:20-cv-00765-DAE
`
`
`

`
`§§
`
`








`
`BANDSPEED, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`AGREED DISCOVERY ORDER
`
`After a review of the pleaded claims and defenses in this action, in furtherance of the
`
`management of the Court’s docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, and after receiving
`
`the input of the parties to this action, it is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Initial Disclosures. The parties will serve the disclosures required by Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) no later than November 17, 2023.
`
`Disclosure of Expert Testimony.1 A party must disclose to the other parties the identity
`
`of any witness it may use at trial to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702,
`
`703 or 705, and:
`
`(a)
`
`if the witness is one retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in
`
`the case or one whose duties as the party’s employee regularly involve giving expert
`
`testimony, provide the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`26(a)(2)(B); and
`
`1 All expert reports should be written such that the report is organized with discrete paragraph
`numbers.
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 2 of 7
`
`(b)
`
`for all other such witnesses, provide the disclosure required by Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 26(a)(2)(C).
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Protective Orders. The Court will enter the parties’ Agreed Protective Order.
`
`Discovery Limitations. The discovery in this cause is limited to the disclosures described
`
`in this Discovery Order and discovery permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, except as modified as follows:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`21 hours for depositions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) per Side,
`
`60 hours of nonparty depositions (which does not include Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6)
`
`depositions) per Side,2 and
`
`4 expert witnesses per Side.
`
`“Side” means a party or a group of parties with a common interest. Any deposition time
`
`requiring the use of a translator shall be counted in an amount equal to 66% of the actual
`
`time incurred (e.g., three hours of deposition time requiring the use of a translator shall
`
`count as two hours). Any party may later move to modify these limitations for good cause.
`
`5.
`
`The Parties agree to the limitations of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 with regard to
`
`the discovery of expert materials. To the extent not already covered by Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26, the Parties further agree to the following limitations regarding the
`
`discovery of expert materials.
`
`i.
`
`No conversations or communications between or including any Party or its
`
`counsel and any testifying or non-testifying expert, or between or including
`
`any testifying expert and any non-testifying expert, including emails,
`
`2 Inventors, party employees, and other third parties (but not including experts) are nonparty
`witnesses for the purposes of this Discovery Order.
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 3 of 7
`
`written agreements, or correspondence, and notes or outlines pertaining
`
`thereto, whether drafted or occurring in connection with this Action or any
`
`prior or pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding (including inter
`
`partes review or reexamination proceedings before the USPTO), will be
`
`subject to discovery or examination at any deposition, hearing, or trial
`
`unless the conversations or communications are relied upon by a testifying
`
`expert in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in this Action.
`
`ii.
`
`All materials generated by any testifying expert in connection with this
`
`Action are exempt from discovery, unless relied upon by a testifying expert
`
`in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in this Action.
`
`Testifying experts shall not be subject to discovery or examination at any
`
`deposition, hearing, or trial on any draft of their expert reports, draft
`
`declarations, and draft affidavits, nor notes or outlines pertaining thereto,
`
`whether drafted in connection with this Action or any prior or pending
`
`investigation, litigation, or proceeding (including inter partes review or
`
`reexamination proceedings before the USPTO).
`
`iii.
`
`Discovery of materials provided to testifying experts, whether provided in
`
`connection with this Action or any prior or pending investigation, litigation,
`
`or proceeding (including inter partes review or reexamination proceedings
`
`before the USPTO), shall be limited to those materials, facts, non-testifying
`
`expert opinions, and other matters actually relied upon by a testifying expert
`
`in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in this Action.
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 4 of 7
`
`iv.
`
`Non-testifying experts shall not be subject to discovery, except to the extent
`
`a testifying expert is relying on the work or opinions of a non-testifying
`
`expert in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in this Action.
`
`Where a testifying expert is relying on the work or opinions of a non-
`
`testifying expert, discovery can be taken from the non-testifying expert with
`
`the same limitations that apply to testifying experts, but discovery shall be
`
`limited to the information provided to the testifying expert that the testifying
`
`expert is relying on in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in
`
`this Action and the basis for such information.
`
`(a) Privilege Logs. Documents or information created, conveyed, and/or dated after the
`
`filing date of these Actions that are protected by attorney-client privilege and/or
`
`attorney work product, including any applicable common interest privilege, are not
`
`required to be included in either party’s privilege log.
`
`(b) Third Party Discovery. A party who serves a subpoena in this matter on a third party
`
`shall provide a copy to all other parties. A party who receives documents from a third
`
`party pursuant to a subpoena shall reproduce those documents to the other party(s) as
`
`soon as practicable and at most no later than five (5) business days after receiving the
`
`documents. A party to whom documents or things are made available for inspection
`
`shall notify the other party(s) that such materials are available for inspection as soon as
`
`practicable and at most no later than three (3) business days after the documents are
`
`made available for inspection.
`
`(c) Email Discovery. General ESI production requests under Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure 34 and 45, or compliance with a mandatory disclosure order of this Court,
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 5 of 7
`
`shall not include email or other forms of electronic correspondence (collectively “e-
`
`mail”). The Parties further agree to forego serving and responding to specific email
`
`production requests. However, the parties do not waive their rights to seek email
`
`production upon a showing of good cause. To the extent a Party has shown good cause
`
`to seek the production of emails, the Parties agree to make a good faith effort to agree
`
`upon a procedure for the production of emails.
`
`(d) ESI Provisions.
`
`i. General Document Image Format. Each electronic document shall be
`
`produced in (1) multi-page PDF or (2) single-page Tagged Image File
`
`Format (“TIFF”) or (3) Joint Photographic Expert Group (“JPEG”) format,
`
`except for documents where production in such format would be impractical
`
`(including, for example, large spreadsheets). TIFF and JPEG files shall be
`
`single page and shall be named with a unique production number followed
`
`by the appropriate file extension. Load files shall be provided to indicate
`
`the location and unitization of the TIFF and JPEG files. If a document is
`
`more than one page, the unitization of the document and any attachments
`
`and/or affixed notes shall be maintained as they existed in the original
`
`document. To the extent reasonably possible, produced data will be de-
`
`duplicated across custodians using industry standard de-duplication
`
`techniques, including without limitation using an MD5 or SHA-1 hash
`
`value.
`
`ii.
`
`Text-Searchable Documents. No party has an obligation to make its
`
`production text-searchable; however, if a party’s documents already exist
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 6 of 7
`
`in text-searchable format independent of this litigation, or are converted to
`
`text-searchable format for use in this litigation, including for use by the
`
`producing party’s counsel, then such documents shall be produced in the
`
`same text-searchable format at no cost to the receiving party unless it cannot
`
`reasonably be done.
`
`iii.
`
`Footer. Each document image shall contain a footer with a sequentially
`
`ascending production number.
`
`iv.
`
`Native Files. A party that receives a document produced in a format
`
`specified above may make a reasonable request to receive the document in
`
`its native format, and upon receipt of such a request, the producing party
`
`shall produce the document in its native format unless it cannot reasonably
`
`be done. If the producing party objects to the request as unreasonable, the
`
`parties shall meet and confer.
`
`v.
`
`No Backup Restoration Required. Absent a showing of good cause, no
`
`party need restore any form of media upon which backup data is maintained
`
`in a party’s normal or allowed processes, including but not limited to backup
`
`tapes, disks, SAN, and other forms of media, to comply with its discovery
`
`obligations in the present case. Absent a showing of good cause, no party
`
`shall be required to produce ESI from sources that are not reasonably
`
`accessible in light of the burdens and costs required to locate, restore,
`
`review, and produce whatever responsive information may be found.
`
`vi.
`
`Voicemail and Mobile Devices. Absent a showing of good cause,
`
`voicemails, PDAs, text messages, instant messages and chats (including but
`
`- 6 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 7 of 7
`
`not limited to internal corporate chat and communication platforms), and
`
`mobile phones are deemed not reasonably accessible and need not be
`
`collected and preserved.
`
`vii. Metadata. Absent a showing of good cause, general ESI production
`
`requests under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 34 and 45, or compliance
`
`with a mandatory disclosure requirement of this Court, shall not include
`
`metadata. However, fields showing the date and time that the document
`
`was sent and received, the author of the document, as well as the complete
`
`distribution list, shall generally be included in the production if such fields
`
`exist.
`
`SIGNED this 27th day of November, 2023.
`
`THE HONORABLE DAVID A. EZRA
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket