`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`CASE NO. 1:20-cv-00765-DAE
`
`
`
`§
`
`§§
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`BANDSPEED, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`AGREED DISCOVERY ORDER
`
`After a review of the pleaded claims and defenses in this action, in furtherance of the
`
`management of the Court’s docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, and after receiving
`
`the input of the parties to this action, it is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Initial Disclosures. The parties will serve the disclosures required by Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) no later than November 17, 2023.
`
`Disclosure of Expert Testimony.1 A party must disclose to the other parties the identity
`
`of any witness it may use at trial to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702,
`
`703 or 705, and:
`
`(a)
`
`if the witness is one retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in
`
`the case or one whose duties as the party’s employee regularly involve giving expert
`
`testimony, provide the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`26(a)(2)(B); and
`
`1 All expert reports should be written such that the report is organized with discrete paragraph
`numbers.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 2 of 7
`
`(b)
`
`for all other such witnesses, provide the disclosure required by Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 26(a)(2)(C).
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Protective Orders. The Court will enter the parties’ Agreed Protective Order.
`
`Discovery Limitations. The discovery in this cause is limited to the disclosures described
`
`in this Discovery Order and discovery permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, except as modified as follows:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`21 hours for depositions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) per Side,
`
`60 hours of nonparty depositions (which does not include Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6)
`
`depositions) per Side,2 and
`
`4 expert witnesses per Side.
`
`“Side” means a party or a group of parties with a common interest. Any deposition time
`
`requiring the use of a translator shall be counted in an amount equal to 66% of the actual
`
`time incurred (e.g., three hours of deposition time requiring the use of a translator shall
`
`count as two hours). Any party may later move to modify these limitations for good cause.
`
`5.
`
`The Parties agree to the limitations of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 with regard to
`
`the discovery of expert materials. To the extent not already covered by Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26, the Parties further agree to the following limitations regarding the
`
`discovery of expert materials.
`
`i.
`
`No conversations or communications between or including any Party or its
`
`counsel and any testifying or non-testifying expert, or between or including
`
`any testifying expert and any non-testifying expert, including emails,
`
`2 Inventors, party employees, and other third parties (but not including experts) are nonparty
`witnesses for the purposes of this Discovery Order.
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 3 of 7
`
`written agreements, or correspondence, and notes or outlines pertaining
`
`thereto, whether drafted or occurring in connection with this Action or any
`
`prior or pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding (including inter
`
`partes review or reexamination proceedings before the USPTO), will be
`
`subject to discovery or examination at any deposition, hearing, or trial
`
`unless the conversations or communications are relied upon by a testifying
`
`expert in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in this Action.
`
`ii.
`
`All materials generated by any testifying expert in connection with this
`
`Action are exempt from discovery, unless relied upon by a testifying expert
`
`in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in this Action.
`
`Testifying experts shall not be subject to discovery or examination at any
`
`deposition, hearing, or trial on any draft of their expert reports, draft
`
`declarations, and draft affidavits, nor notes or outlines pertaining thereto,
`
`whether drafted in connection with this Action or any prior or pending
`
`investigation, litigation, or proceeding (including inter partes review or
`
`reexamination proceedings before the USPTO).
`
`iii.
`
`Discovery of materials provided to testifying experts, whether provided in
`
`connection with this Action or any prior or pending investigation, litigation,
`
`or proceeding (including inter partes review or reexamination proceedings
`
`before the USPTO), shall be limited to those materials, facts, non-testifying
`
`expert opinions, and other matters actually relied upon by a testifying expert
`
`in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in this Action.
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 4 of 7
`
`iv.
`
`Non-testifying experts shall not be subject to discovery, except to the extent
`
`a testifying expert is relying on the work or opinions of a non-testifying
`
`expert in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in this Action.
`
`Where a testifying expert is relying on the work or opinions of a non-
`
`testifying expert, discovery can be taken from the non-testifying expert with
`
`the same limitations that apply to testifying experts, but discovery shall be
`
`limited to the information provided to the testifying expert that the testifying
`
`expert is relying on in formulating his or her final report or any opinion in
`
`this Action and the basis for such information.
`
`(a) Privilege Logs. Documents or information created, conveyed, and/or dated after the
`
`filing date of these Actions that are protected by attorney-client privilege and/or
`
`attorney work product, including any applicable common interest privilege, are not
`
`required to be included in either party’s privilege log.
`
`(b) Third Party Discovery. A party who serves a subpoena in this matter on a third party
`
`shall provide a copy to all other parties. A party who receives documents from a third
`
`party pursuant to a subpoena shall reproduce those documents to the other party(s) as
`
`soon as practicable and at most no later than five (5) business days after receiving the
`
`documents. A party to whom documents or things are made available for inspection
`
`shall notify the other party(s) that such materials are available for inspection as soon as
`
`practicable and at most no later than three (3) business days after the documents are
`
`made available for inspection.
`
`(c) Email Discovery. General ESI production requests under Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure 34 and 45, or compliance with a mandatory disclosure order of this Court,
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 5 of 7
`
`shall not include email or other forms of electronic correspondence (collectively “e-
`
`mail”). The Parties further agree to forego serving and responding to specific email
`
`production requests. However, the parties do not waive their rights to seek email
`
`production upon a showing of good cause. To the extent a Party has shown good cause
`
`to seek the production of emails, the Parties agree to make a good faith effort to agree
`
`upon a procedure for the production of emails.
`
`(d) ESI Provisions.
`
`i. General Document Image Format. Each electronic document shall be
`
`produced in (1) multi-page PDF or (2) single-page Tagged Image File
`
`Format (“TIFF”) or (3) Joint Photographic Expert Group (“JPEG”) format,
`
`except for documents where production in such format would be impractical
`
`(including, for example, large spreadsheets). TIFF and JPEG files shall be
`
`single page and shall be named with a unique production number followed
`
`by the appropriate file extension. Load files shall be provided to indicate
`
`the location and unitization of the TIFF and JPEG files. If a document is
`
`more than one page, the unitization of the document and any attachments
`
`and/or affixed notes shall be maintained as they existed in the original
`
`document. To the extent reasonably possible, produced data will be de-
`
`duplicated across custodians using industry standard de-duplication
`
`techniques, including without limitation using an MD5 or SHA-1 hash
`
`value.
`
`ii.
`
`Text-Searchable Documents. No party has an obligation to make its
`
`production text-searchable; however, if a party’s documents already exist
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 6 of 7
`
`in text-searchable format independent of this litigation, or are converted to
`
`text-searchable format for use in this litigation, including for use by the
`
`producing party’s counsel, then such documents shall be produced in the
`
`same text-searchable format at no cost to the receiving party unless it cannot
`
`reasonably be done.
`
`iii.
`
`Footer. Each document image shall contain a footer with a sequentially
`
`ascending production number.
`
`iv.
`
`Native Files. A party that receives a document produced in a format
`
`specified above may make a reasonable request to receive the document in
`
`its native format, and upon receipt of such a request, the producing party
`
`shall produce the document in its native format unless it cannot reasonably
`
`be done. If the producing party objects to the request as unreasonable, the
`
`parties shall meet and confer.
`
`v.
`
`No Backup Restoration Required. Absent a showing of good cause, no
`
`party need restore any form of media upon which backup data is maintained
`
`in a party’s normal or allowed processes, including but not limited to backup
`
`tapes, disks, SAN, and other forms of media, to comply with its discovery
`
`obligations in the present case. Absent a showing of good cause, no party
`
`shall be required to produce ESI from sources that are not reasonably
`
`accessible in light of the burdens and costs required to locate, restore,
`
`review, and produce whatever responsive information may be found.
`
`vi.
`
`Voicemail and Mobile Devices. Absent a showing of good cause,
`
`voicemails, PDAs, text messages, instant messages and chats (including but
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00765-DAE Document 76 Filed 11/27/23 Page 7 of 7
`
`not limited to internal corporate chat and communication platforms), and
`
`mobile phones are deemed not reasonably accessible and need not be
`
`collected and preserved.
`
`vii. Metadata. Absent a showing of good cause, general ESI production
`
`requests under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 34 and 45, or compliance
`
`with a mandatory disclosure requirement of this Court, shall not include
`
`metadata. However, fields showing the date and time that the document
`
`was sent and received, the author of the document, as well as the complete
`
`distribution list, shall generally be included in the production if such fields
`
`exist.
`
`SIGNED this 27th day of November, 2023.
`
`THE HONORABLE DAVID A. EZRA
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`