Case 6:20-cv-00420-ADA Document 58 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`AMENDED STANDING ORDER REGARDING
`NOTICE OF READINESS FOR PATENT CASES
`
`In all patent cases pending before the undersigned, the Parties are directed to jointly file
`
`the Case Readiness Status Report (“CRSR”) in the format attached as Exhibit A: (a) within seven
`
`(7) days after the defendant (or at least one defendant among a group of related defendants sued
`
`together) has responded to the initial pleadings in cases where there are no CRSR Related Cases
`
`as defined below1, or (b) when there are CRSR Related Cases, within seven (7) days after the last
`
`defendant (or last defendant group when at least one defendant among the group has responded)
`
`among the CRSR Related Cases has responded to the initial pleadings. The CRSR shall be filed
`
`in each case and, with regard to CRSR Related Cases, it shall identify all other CRSR Related
`
`Cases.
`
`The Parties are directed to meet and confer before jointly filling the CRSR. Plaintiff shall
`
`be responsible for ensuring the prompt filing of the CRSR. Plaintiff shall also email the Court
`
`(TXWDml_LawClerks_JudgeAlbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) a courtesy copy of the CRSR and
`
`shall also copy the Defendant(s). If the parties have any pre-Markman issues in need of
`
`resolution, the parties are directed to email the Court a joint submission of the parties’ positions
`
`after filing the CRSR so the Court can consider whether to hold a telephonic hearing to resolve
`
`these issues.
`
`Once the CRSR has been filed, the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) shall be
`
`deemed to occur fourteen (14) days after the filing date of the CRSR. With regard to CRSR
`
`1 For purposes of this Order, cases shall be considered CRSR Related Cases when: (1) they are filed
`within thirty (30) days after the first case is filed, and (2) they share at least one common asserted patent.
`
`VERSION 2.2
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`AMENDED STANDING ORDER REGARDING
`NOTICE OF READINESS FOR PATENT CASES
`
`In all patent cases pending before the undersigned, the Parties are directed to jointly file
`
`the Case Readiness Status Report (“CRSR”) in the format attached as Exhibit A: (a) within seven
`
`(7) days after the defendant (or at least one defendant among a group of related defendants sued
`
`together) has responded to the initial pleadings in cases where there are no CRSR Related Cases
`
`as defined below1, or (b) when there are CRSR Related Cases, within seven (7) days after the last
`
`defendant (or last defendant group when at least one defendant among the group has responded)
`
`among the CRSR Related Cases has responded to the initial pleadings. The CRSR shall be filed
`
`in each case and, with regard to CRSR Related Cases, it shall identify all other CRSR Related
`
`Cases.
`
`The Parties are directed to meet and confer before jointly filling the CRSR. Plaintiff shall
`
`be responsible for ensuring the prompt filing of the CRSR. Plaintiff shall also email the Court
`
`(TXWDml_LawClerks_JudgeAlbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) a courtesy copy of the CRSR and
`
`shall also copy the Defendant(s). If the parties have any pre-Markman issues in need of
`
`resolution, the parties are directed to email the Court a joint submission of the parties’ positions
`
`after filing the CRSR so the Court can consider whether to hold a telephonic hearing to resolve
`
`these issues.
`
`Once the CRSR has been filed, the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) shall be
`
`deemed to occur fourteen (14) days after the filing date of the CRSR. With regard to CRSR
`
`1 For purposes of this Order, cases shall be considered CRSR Related Cases when: (1) they are filed
`within thirty (30) days after the first case is filed, and (2) they share at least one common asserted patent.
`
`VERSION 2.2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00420-ADA Document 58 Filed 06/16/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`Related Cases, if the CRSRs are not all submitted on the same date, the CMC shall be deemed to
`
`occur fourteen (14) days after the last CRSR in those CRSR Related Cases is filed. The Court
`
`intends to coordinate the CRSR Related Cases on the same schedule with a single Markman
`
`hearing, so the parties should plan accordingly. In all cases, the Markman hearing shall be initially
`
`scheduled for twenty-three (23) weeks after the CMC and should be included in the parties’
`
`proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with the Court’s Order Governing Proceedings.
`
`This Order shall apply to all cases where the CRSR has not already been filed as of the date
`
`of this Order. In any case where the parties have submitted their CRSR before the date of this
`
`Order but have not received an order setting their CMC, the CMC for that case (or cases) will be
`
`deemed to occur fourteen (14) days after the date of this Order. To the extent that the CRSR in a
`
`case (or related cases) is overdue pursuant to this Order, the parties are directed to file the CRSR
`
`within seven (7) days after the date of this Order. If after entry of this Order there are any cases
`
`awaiting a CMC where the CMC will not be set by operation of this Order, the parties should
`
`contact the Court for guidance.
`
`If any party believes that the operation of this Order will cause undue prejudice, that party
`
`may contact the Court to seek appropriate relief.
`
`SIGNED this 16th day of June, 2021.
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`VERSION 2.2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00420-ADA Document 58 Filed 06/16/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`Exhibit A
`
`VERSION 2.2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00420-ADA Document 58 Filed 06/16/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`[Plaintiff],
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`
` v.
`
`[Defendant],
`
`Defendant
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00000-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`Plaintiff [names] and Defendant [name(s)], hereby provide the following status report.
`
`FILING AND EXTENSIONS
`
`Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed on [filing date]. There have been [one/two] extension[s]
`
`for a total of __ days.
`
`RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
`[Indicate if/when the defendant(s) responded to the Complaint, whether it was an Answer or
`
`Motion, and whether any counterclaims were filed other than counterclaims for non-infringement
`
`or invalidity]
`
`PENDING MOTIONS
`
`[Identify all pending motions]
`RELATED CASES IN THIS JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`[Identify all related cases in this Judicial District, including any other cases where a
`common patent is asserted]
`IPR, CBM, AND OTHER PGR FILINGS
`[There are no known IPR, CBM, or other PGR filings.] [Or]
`
`VERSION 2.2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00420-ADA Document 58 Filed 06/16/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`ALT: IPR2021-00000 was filed on ____ and docketed on ____. An institution decision is
`expected on or before ___. A Final Written decision is expected on or before _____.]
`NUMBER OF ASSERTED PATENTS AND CLAIMS
`Plaintiff has asserted [Num Patents] patent[s] and a total of [Num Claims] claims. The
`asserted patent(s) are U.S. Patent Nos. ____.
`[If a Plaintiff has already served Preliminary Infringement Contentions (“PICs”), note the date of
`service. Note: Per the Court’s Order Governing Proceeding, Plaintiff must serve PICs no later
`than 7 days before the CMC]
`APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL ADVISER
`[Indicate whether the parties request a technical adviser to be appointed to the case to assist the
`Court with claim construction or other technical issues]
`MEET AND CONFER STATUS
`Plaintiff and Defendant met and conferred. [The parties have no pre-Markman issues to
`raise at the CMC.] or [The parties identified the following pre-Markman issues to raise at the CMC
`[list].
`
`Dated: ___________
`
`Respectfully Submitted
`
`/s/
`
`VERSION 2.2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
