`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`Richman Technology Corporation,
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-769
`
`Patent Case
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Google LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Richman Technology Corporation (“Plaintiff”), through its attorneys, complains
`
`of Google LLC (“Defendant”), and alleges the following:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Richman Technology Corporation is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of Delaware that maintains its principal place of business at 7840
`
`Mission Center Ct, San Diego, CA 92108.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Google LLC is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`
`Delaware that maintains an established place of business at 500 W 2nd Street, Austin, TX 78701.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`3.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35 of the United States Code.
`
`4.
`
`This Court has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1338(a).
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 2 of 12
`
`5.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because it has engaged in
`
`systematic and continuous business activities in this District. As described below, Defendant has
`
`committed acts of patent infringement giving rise to this action within this District.
`
`VENUE
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) because Defendant has
`
`committed acts of patent infringement in this District, and has an established place of business in
`
`this District. In addition, Plaintiff has suffered harm in this district.
`
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiff is the assignee of all right, title and interest in United States Patent Nos.
`
`7,990,268 (the “’268 Patent”); 8,174,378 (the “’378 Patent”); 8,981,933 (the “’933 Patent”);
`
`9,449,484 (the “’484 Patent”); (collectively the “Patents-in-Suit”); including all rights to enforce
`
`and prosecute actions for infringement and to collect damages for all relevant times against
`
`infringers of the Patents-in-Suit. Accordingly, Plaintiff possesses the exclusive right and standing
`
`to prosecute the present action for infringement of the Patents-in-Suit by Defendant.
`
`The ’268 Patent
`
`8.
`
`The ’268 Patent is entitled “Method and protocol for real time security system,”
`
`and issued 8/2/2011. The application leading to the ’268 Patent was filed on 10/17/2008. A true
`
`and correct copy of the ’268 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by
`
`reference.
`
`9.
`
`The ’268 Patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`The ’378 Patent
`
`10.
`
`The ’378 Patent is entitled “Human guard enhancing multiple site security
`
`system,” and issued 5/8/2012. The application leading to the ’378 Patent was filed on 3/18/2005.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 3 of 12
`
`A true and correct copy of the ’378 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein
`
`by reference.
`
`11.
`
`The ’378 Patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`The ’933 Patent
`
`12.
`
`The ’933 Patent is entitled “System for real time security monitoring,” and issued
`
`3/17/2015. The application leading to the ’933 Patent was filed on 12/28/2012. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ’933 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 3 and incorporated herein by
`
`reference.
`
`13.
`
`The ’933 Patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`The ’484 Patent
`
`14.
`
`The ’484 Patent is entitled “System for real time security monitoring,” and issued
`
`9/20/2016. The application leading to the ’484 Patent was filed on 2/17/2015. A true and correct
`
`copy of the ’484 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 4 and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`15.
`
`The ’484 Patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`COUNT 1: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’268 PATENT
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the above paragraphs herein by reference.
`
`Direct Infringement. Defendant has been and continues to directly infringe one
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`or more claims of the ’268 Patent in at least this District by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`selling and/or importing, without limitation, at least the Defendant products identified in the
`
`charts incorporated into this Count below (among the “Exemplary Defendant Products”) that
`
`infringe at least the exemplary claims of the ’268 Patent also identified in the charts incorporated
`
`into this Count below (the “Exemplary ’268 Patent Claims”) literally or by the doctrine of
`
`equivalents. On information and belief, numerous other devices that infringe the claims of the
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 4 of 12
`
`’268 Patent have been made, used, sold, imported, and offered for sale by Defendant and/or its
`
`customers.
`
`18.
`
`Defendant also has and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, the Exemplary ’268 Patent Claims, by having its employees internally
`
`test and use these Exemplary Products.
`
`19.
`
`The service of this Complaint upon Defendant constitutes actual knowledge of
`
`infringement as alleged here.
`
`20.
`
`Despite such actual knowledge, Defendant continues to make, use, test, sell, offer
`
`for sale, market, and/or import into the United States, products that infringe the ’268 Patent. On
`
`information and belief, Defendant has also continued to sell the Exemplary Defendant Products
`
`and distribute product literature and website materials inducing end users and others to use its
`
`products in the customary and intended manner that infringes the ’268 Patent. Thus, on
`
`information and belief, Defendant is contributing to and/or inducing the infringement of the ’268
`
`Patent.
`
`21.
`
`Induced Infringement. Defendant actively, knowingly, and intentionally has
`
`been and continues to induce infringement of the ’268 Patent, literally or by the doctrine of
`
`equivalents, by selling Exemplary Defendant Products to their customers for use in end-user
`
`products in a manner that infringes one or more claims of the ’268 Patent.
`
`22.
`
`Contributory Infringement. Defendant actively, knowingly, and intentionally
`
`has been and continues materially contribute to their own customers’ infringement of the ’268
`
`Patent, literally or by the doctrine of equivalents, by selling Exemplary Defendant Products to
`
`their customers for use in end-user products in a manner that infringes one or more claims of the
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 5 of 12
`
`’268 Patent. Moreover, the Exemplary Defendant Products are not a staple article of commerce
`
`suitable for substantial noninfringing use.
`
`23.
`
`Exhibit 5 includes charts comparing the Exemplary ’268 Patent Claims to the
`
`Exemplary Defendant Products. As set forth in these charts, the Exemplary Defendant Products
`
`practice the technology claimed by the ’268 Patent. Accordingly, the Exemplary Defendant
`
`Products incorporated in these charts satisfy all elements of the Exemplary ’268 Patent Claims.
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiff therefore incorporates by reference in its allegations herein the claim
`
`charts of Exhibit 5.
`
`25.
`
`Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for Defendant’s
`
`infringement.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`COUNT 2: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’378 PATENT
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the above paragraphs herein by reference.
`
`Direct Infringement. Defendant has been and continues to directly infringe one
`
`or more claims of the ’378 Patent in at least this District by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`selling and/or importing, without limitation, at least the Defendant products identified in the
`
`charts incorporated into this Count below (among the “Exemplary Defendant Products”) that
`
`infringe at least the exemplary claims of the ’378 Patent also identified in the charts incorporated
`
`into this Count below (the “Exemplary ’378 Patent Claims”) literally or by the doctrine of
`
`equivalents. On information and belief, numerous other devices that infringe the claims of the
`
`’378 Patent have been made, used, sold, imported, and offered for sale by Defendant and/or its
`
`customers.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant also has and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, the Exemplary ’378 Patent Claims, by having its employees internally
`
`test and use these Exemplary Products.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 6 of 12
`
`29.
`
`The service of this Complaint upon Defendant constitutes actual knowledge of
`
`infringement as alleged here.
`
`30.
`
`Despite such actual knowledge, Defendant continues to make, use, test, sell, offer
`
`for sale, market, and/or import into the United States, products that infringe the ’378 Patent. On
`
`information and belief, Defendant has also continued to sell the Exemplary Defendant Products
`
`and distribute product literature and website materials inducing end users and others to use its
`
`products in the customary and intended manner that infringes the ’378 Patent. Thus, on
`
`information and belief, Defendant is contributing to and/or inducing the infringement of the ’378
`
`Patent.
`
`31.
`
`Induced Infringement. Defendant actively, knowingly, and intentionally has
`
`been and continues to induce infringement of the ’378 Patent, literally or by the doctrine of
`
`equivalents, by selling Exemplary Defendant Products to their customers for use in end-user
`
`products in a manner that infringes one or more claims of the ’378 Patent.
`
`32.
`
`Contributory Infringement. Defendant actively, knowingly, and intentionally
`
`has been and continues materially contribute to their own customers’ infringement of the ’378
`
`Patent, literally or by the doctrine of equivalents, by selling Exemplary Defendant Products to
`
`their customers for use in end-user products in a manner that infringes one or more claims of the
`
`’378 Patent. Moreover, the Exemplary Defendant Products are not a staple article of commerce
`
`suitable for substantial noninfringing use.
`
`33.
`
`Exhibit 6 includes charts comparing the Exemplary ’378 Patent Claims to the
`
`Exemplary Defendant Products. As set forth in these charts, the Exemplary Defendant Products
`
`practice the technology claimed by the ’378 Patent. Accordingly, the Exemplary Defendant
`
`Products incorporated in these charts satisfy all elements of the Exemplary ’378 Patent Claims.
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 7 of 12
`
`34.
`
`Plaintiff therefore incorporates by reference in its allegations herein the claim
`
`charts of Exhibit 6.
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for Defendant’s
`
`infringement.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`COUNT 3: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’933 PATENT
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the above paragraphs herein by reference.
`
`Direct Infringement. Defendant has been and continues to directly infringe one
`
`or more claims of the ’933 Patent in at least this District by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`selling and/or importing, without limitation, at least the Defendant products identified in the
`
`charts incorporated into this Count below (among the “Exemplary Defendant Products”) that
`
`infringe at least the exemplary claims of the ’933 Patent also identified in the charts incorporated
`
`into this Count below (the “Exemplary ’933 Patent Claims”) literally or by the doctrine of
`
`equivalents. On information and belief, numerous other devices that infringe the claims of the
`
`’933 Patent have been made, used, sold, imported, and offered for sale by Defendant and/or its
`
`customers.
`
`38.
`
`Defendant also has and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, the Exemplary ’933 Patent Claims, by having its employees internally
`
`test and use these Exemplary Products.
`
`39.
`
`The service of this Complaint upon Defendant constitutes actual knowledge of
`
`infringement as alleged here.
`
`40.
`
`Despite such actual knowledge, Defendant continues to make, use, test, sell, offer
`
`for sale, market, and/or import into the United States, products that infringe the ’933 Patent. On
`
`information and belief, Defendant has also continued to sell the Exemplary Defendant Products
`
`and distribute product literature and website materials inducing end users and others to use its
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 8 of 12
`
`products in the customary and intended manner that infringes the ’933 Patent. Thus, on
`
`information and belief, Defendant is contributing to and/or inducing the infringement of the ’933
`
`Patent.
`
`41.
`
`Induced Infringement. Defendant actively, knowingly, and intentionally has
`
`been and continues to induce infringement of the ’933 Patent, literally or by the doctrine of
`
`equivalents, by selling Exemplary Defendant Products to their customers for use in end-user
`
`products in a manner that infringes one or more claims of the ’933 Patent.
`
`42.
`
`Contributory Infringement. Defendant actively, knowingly, and intentionally
`
`has been and continues materially contribute to their own customers’ infringement of the ’933
`
`Patent, literally or by the doctrine of equivalents, by selling Exemplary Defendant Products to
`
`their customers for use in end-user products in a manner that infringes one or more claims of the
`
`’933 Patent. Moreover, the Exemplary Defendant Products are not a staple article of commerce
`
`suitable for substantial noninfringing use.
`
`43.
`
`Exhibit 7 includes charts comparing the Exemplary ’933 Patent Claims to the
`
`Exemplary Defendant Products. As set forth in these charts, the Exemplary Defendant Products
`
`practice the technology claimed by the ’933 Patent. Accordingly, the Exemplary Defendant
`
`Products incorporated in these charts satisfy all elements of the Exemplary ’933 Patent Claims.
`
`44.
`
`Plaintiff therefore incorporates by reference in its allegations herein the claim
`
`charts of Exhibit 7.
`
`45.
`
`Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for Defendant’s
`
`infringement.
`
`COUNT 4: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’484 PATENT
`
`46.
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the above paragraphs herein by reference.
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 9 of 12
`
`47.
`
`Direct Infringement. Defendant has been and continues to directly infringe one
`
`or more claims of the ’484 Patent in at least this District by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`selling and/or importing, without limitation, at least the Defendant products identified in the
`
`charts incorporated into this Count below (among the “Exemplary Defendant Products”) that
`
`infringe at least the exemplary claims of the ’484 Patent also identified in the charts incorporated
`
`into this Count below (the “Exemplary ’484 Patent Claims”) literally or by the doctrine of
`
`equivalents. On information and belief, numerous other devices that infringe the claims of the
`
`’484 Patent have been made, used, sold, imported, and offered for sale by Defendant and/or its
`
`customers.
`
`48.
`
`Defendant also has and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, the Exemplary ’484 Patent Claims, by having its employees internally
`
`test and use these Exemplary Products.
`
`49.
`
`The service of this Complaint upon Defendant constitutes actual knowledge of
`
`infringement as alleged here.
`
`50.
`
`Despite such actual knowledge, Defendant continues to make, use, test, sell, offer
`
`for sale, market, and/or import into the United States, products that infringe the ’484 Patent. On
`
`information and belief, Defendant has also continued to sell the Exemplary Defendant Products
`
`and distribute product literature and website materials inducing end users and others to use its
`
`products in the customary and intended manner that infringes the ’484 Patent. Thus, on
`
`information and belief, Defendant is contributing to and/or inducing the infringement of the ’484
`
`Patent.
`
`51.
`
`Induced Infringement. Defendant actively, knowingly, and intentionally has
`
`been and continues to induce infringement of the ’484 Patent, literally or by the doctrine of
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 10 of 12
`
`equivalents, by selling Exemplary Defendant Products to their customers for use in end-user
`
`products in a manner that infringes one or more claims of the ’484 Patent.
`
`52.
`
`Contributory Infringement. Defendant actively, knowingly, and intentionally
`
`has been and continues materially contribute to their own customers’ infringement of the ’484
`
`Patent, literally or by the doctrine of equivalents, by selling Exemplary Defendant Products to
`
`their customers for use in end-user products in a manner that infringes one or more claims of the
`
`’484 Patent. Moreover, the Exemplary Defendant Products are not a staple article of commerce
`
`suitable for substantial noninfringing use.
`
`53.
`
`Exhibit 8 includes charts comparing the Exemplary ’484 Patent Claims to the
`
`Exemplary Defendant Products. As set forth in these charts, the Exemplary Defendant Products
`
`practice the technology claimed by the ’484 Patent. Accordingly, the Exemplary Defendant
`
`Products incorporated in these charts satisfy all elements of the Exemplary ’484 Patent Claims.
`
`54.
`
`Plaintiff therefore incorporates by reference in its allegations herein the claim
`
`charts of Exhibit 8.
`
`55.
`
`Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for Defendant’s
`
`infringement.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`56.
`
`Under Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff respectfully
`
`requests a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`A judgment that the ’268 Patent is valid and enforceable;
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 11 of 12
`
`B.
`
`A judgment that Defendant has infringed, contributorily infringed, and/or induced
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`E.
`
`F.
`
`G.
`
`H.
`
`I.
`
`J.
`
`infringement of one or more claims of the ’268 Patent;
`
`A judgment that the ’378 Patent is valid and enforceable;
`
`A judgment that Defendant has infringed, contributorily infringed, and/or induced
`
`infringement of one or more claims of the ’378 Patent;
`
`A judgment that the ’933 Patent is valid and enforceable;
`
`A judgment that Defendant has infringed, contributorily infringed, and/or induced
`
`infringement of one or more claims of the ’933 Patent;
`
`A judgment that the ’484 Patent is valid and enforceable;
`
`A judgment that Defendant has infringed, contributorily infringed, and/or induced
`
`infringement of one or more claims of the ’484 Patent;
`
`An accounting of all damages not presented at trial;
`
`A judgment that awards Plaintiff all appropriate damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284
`
`for Defendant’s past infringement and, with respect to the ’268 patent, the ’378
`
`patent, the ’933 patent, the ’484 patent, any continuing or future infringement, up
`
`until the date such judgment is entered including pre- or post-judgment interest,
`
`costs, and disbursements as justified under 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`K.
`
`And, if necessary, to adequately compensate Plaintiff for Defendant’s
`
`infringement, an accounting:
`
`i.
`
`that this case be declared exceptional within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285
`
`and that Plaintiff be awarded its reasonable attorneys’ fees against Defendant
`
`that it incurs in prosecuting this action;
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00769-ADA Document 1 Filed 08/25/20 Page 12 of 12
`
`ii.
`
`that Plaintiff be awarded costs, and expenses that it incurs in prosecuting this
`
`action; and
`
`iii.
`
`that Plaintiff be awarded such further relief at law or in equity as the Court
`
`deems just and proper.
`
`Dated: August 25, 2020
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Isaac Rabicoff
`Isaac Rabicoff
`Rabicoff Law LLC
`73 W Monroe St
`Chicago, IL 60603
`(773) 669-4590
`isaac@rabilaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`Richman Technology Corporation
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`