throbber
[REDACTED VERSION]
`Case 6:20-cv-00810-ADA Document 89-1 Filed 05/24/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-810-ADA
`
`10TALES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`TIKTOK INC., TIKTOK PTE. LTD.,
`BYTEDANCE LTD., and BYTEDANCE
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DECLARATION OF RUDOLPH “RUDY” FINK IV IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF
`10TALES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER
`UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404
`
`I, Rudolph “Rudy” Fink IV, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and
`
`correct:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Texas. I am duly licensed to
`
`practice law in the United States District Court, Western District of Texas.
`
`2.
`
`I am an attorney with Davis Firm, P.C., representing Plaintiff 10Tales, Inc. in the
`
`above entitled cause of action.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 1 are true and correct copies of the registration certificates from
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s website for the TIKTOK trademarks, Reg. Nos.
`
`6,069,518; 5,981,213; 5,981,212; 5,974,902; and 5,653,614, which were registered by Bytedance
`
`Ltd.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of an e-mail exchange between
`
`counsel on March 24 and 25, 2021 as provided by counsel.
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00810-ADA Document 89-1 Filed 05/24/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the LinkedIn page for Mr. Sam
`
`Christie as downloaded by counsel.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the
`
` that was attached as Appendix 2 to Defendants’ First Supplemental Objections and
`
`Responses to 10Tales’ First Jurisdictional Interrogatories (Raghavan Deposition Ex. 5) as provided
`
`by counsel.
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the LinkedIn page for Mr. Jie
`
`Xu, the Senior Director of Engineering for ByteDance in Beijing City, China, as downloaded by
`
`counsel.
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,813,125 as
`
`obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of the Texas Secretary of State
`
`Business Organization Inquiry results for Bytedance Inc.
`
`10.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of Mr. Blake Chandlee’s LinkedIn
`
`page as downloaded by counsel.
`
`11.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the transcript from
`
`the deposition of
`
` taken on April 12, 2021.
`
`12.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the transcript
`
`from the deposition of
`
` taken on April 14, 2021.
`
`13.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the transcript
`
`from the deposition of
`
` taken on April 14, 2021.
`
`14.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the transcript
`
`from the deposition of
`
` taken on April 15, 2021.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00810-ADA Document 89-1 Filed 05/24/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`15.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of Defendants’ Objections and
`
`Responses to 10Tales’ Second Jurisdictional Interrogatories (
`
` Deposition Ex. 3) as provided
`
`by counsel.
`
`16.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of the Declaration of Mr. David
`
`Russek dated April 19, 2021.
`
`17.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of the Supplemental Declaration
`
`of Roland Cloutier dated October 12, 2020 which TikTok, Inc. and Bytedance Ltd. filed in the
`
`United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the case styled TikTok, Inc. v. Donald
`
`J. Trump, Civil Case No. 20-cv-2658, as downloaded by counsel.
`
`18.
`
`On or about March 1, 2021, Defendants produced documents to 10Tales’ counsel.
`
`The document production included
`
` that appear to be in response to
`
`this Court’s Scheduling Order requiring Defendants to produce “technical documents, including
`
`software where applicable, sufficient to show the operation of the accused product(s).”
`
`. Attached as Exhibit 16
`
`is a true and correct copy of one such document produced by Defendants on March 1, 2021 and
`
`which Defendants identified with Bates Numbers TT0002174-TT0002190.
`
`19.
`
`One of the
`
` documents produced by Defendants
`
`Attached as Exhibit 17 is a copy of this document produced by Defendants on March 1, 2021 and
`
`which Defendants have identified with Bates Numbers TT0002293-TT0002295.
`
`20.
`
`information published on LinkedIn, there is a Zuotao (Michael) Liu” who works for Defendants
`
` Based on
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00810-ADA Document 89-1 Filed 05/24/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`in Shanghai, China, and who claims to have been the “Engineer Manager – Recommendations,
`
`TikTok” from August 2018 through February 2021. Attached as Exhibit 18 is a printout from Mr.
`
`Liu’s LinkedIn
`
`page
`
`as
`
`downloaded
`
`by
`
`counsel which
`
`is
`
`accessible
`
`at
`
`https://www.linkedin.com/in/zuotao-liu-9164341b .
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on April 20, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Rudolph Fink IV
`Rudolph “Rudy” Fink IV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket