`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ACQIS LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED
`LIABILITY COMPANY;
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC., A
`TAIWAN CORPORATION; AND
`ASUS GLOBAL PTE. LTD.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL NO. W-20-CV-00966-ADA
`
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`This action came before the Court for a four-day trial by jury commencing on March 18,
`
`2024, between Plaintiff ACQIS LLC (“ACQIS”) and Defendants ASUSTeK Computer, Inc.
`
`(“ASUSTeK”) and ASUS Global Pte. Ltd. (“ASGL”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The issues
`
`have been tried and the jury rendered its unanimous verdict on March 22, 2024 (ECF No. 332).
`
`The jury reached and returned its unanimous verdict (ECF No. 332) finding that:
`
`• Defendant ASGL and non-party Asus Computer International (“ACI”) directly
`
`infringed Claims 10 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 9,529,768 (the ’768 Patent) and
`
`Claim 19 of U.S. Patent No. 8,756,359 (the ’359 Patent) (collectively, the “Asserted
`
`Claims”);
`
`• ASUSTeK and ASGL did not induce infringement of the Asserted Claims;
`
`• ASUSTeK is liable for the actions of ASGL and ACI, and ASGL is liable for the
`
`actions of ACI.
`
`• ACQIS provided ASUSTeK with notice of the ’768 and ’359 Patents and a specific
`
`charge of infringement of the same by a specific product prior to May 12, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00966-ADA Document 351 Filed 01/15/25 Page 2 of 3
`
`• ACQIS did not provide ASGL with notice of the ’768 and ’359 Patents and a
`
`specific charge of infringement of the same by a specific product prior to May 12,
`
`2020;
`
`• The Asserted Claims are not invalid for lack of written description or lack of
`
`enablement;
`
`• The amount of damages that would compensate ACQIS for the infringement of the
`
`Asserted Claims is $17,970,582; and
`
`• ASUSTeK and ASGL did not willfully infringe the Asserted Claims.
`
`The jury received instructions that it, “[i]f ACQIS can show that ASUSTeK and its
`
`subsidiaries, ASGL and ACI, are so closely linked that those subsidiaries have no separate mind,
`
`will or existence of their own and are business conduits of ASUSTeK . . . then you may find that
`
`ASUSTeK should be held personally liable for the subsidiary corporations for purposes of
`
`determining infringement liability.” ECF No. 317 at 28. The jury’s verdict confirmed agency and
`
`alter ego relationships involving ASUSTeK, ASGL, and ACI, holding that (i) ASUSTeK is liable
`
`for the actions of ASGL and ACI, and that (ii) ASGL is liable for the actions of ACI. In accordance
`
`with the jury’s verdict, it is hereby ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff,
`
`ACQIS LLC, and against the defendants, ASUSTeK and ASGL, as to patent infringement as
`
`follows:
`
`• Claims 10 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 9.529,768 (the “‘768 Patent”) and Claim 19
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 8,756,359 (the “’359 Patent”; collectively, the “Asserted
`
`Claims”) were directly infringed by ASGL and by ASUSTeK’s subsidiary, Asus
`
`Computer International (“ACI”);
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00966-ADA Document 351 Filed 01/15/25 Page 3 of 3
`
`• ASUSTeK is liable for the actions of ASGL and ACI, and ASGL is liable for the
`
`actions of ACI.
`
`• ASUSTeK and ASGL did not induce infringement of the Asserted Claims;
`
`• ASUSTeK and ASGL did not willfully infringe the Asserted Claims;
`
`• The Asserted Claims are not invalid for lack of written description or lack of
`
`enablement;
`
`• ASUSTeK was on notice of the ’768 and ’359 Patents as of May 15, 2018;
`
`• ACQIS is awarded and Defendants ASUSTeK and ASGL are liable for damages in
`
`the amount of $17,970,582;
`
`• ACQIS is awarded prejudgment interest in the amount of $2,108,6771 through June
`
`30, 2024, bringing the total monetary award to $20,079,259 as of that date. This
`
`award is to be supplemented with a revised calculation using the date of this Order;
`
`• ACQIS is awarded its costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 54, and Local Rule CV-54, and post-judgement interest assessed on
`
`those costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1961; and
`
`• ACQIS is awarded post-judgement interest on the total monetary award at the rate
`
`prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 and which shall accrue daily and compound
`
`annually.
`
`
`
`SIGNED this 15th day of January, 2025.
`
`
`
`
`1 The Court awards ACQIS prejudgment interest using the 1-Year T-Bill rate compounded quarterly, running from
`the start of infringement. See ECF No. 339-3 at ¶ 9.
`
`
`
`3
`
`