throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 19 Filed 09/14/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-cv-667-ADA
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) and Defendant Google LLC (“Google”)
`
`provide the following status report in advance of the initial Case Management Conference
`
`(CMC).
`
`FILING AND EXTENSIONS
`
`VoIP-Pal’s Complaint was filed on June 25, 2021. There has been one extension for a total
`
`of eight (8) days.
`
`RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
`
`On September 7, 2021, Google responded to VoIP-Pal’s Complaint by filing an Answer.
`
`Dkt. 17. Google did not assert any counterclaims against VoIP-Pal.
`
`PENDING MOTIONS
`
`There are no pending motions in this case at this time.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 19 Filed 09/14/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`●
`
`●
`
`●
`
`●
`
`●
`
`●
`
`RELATED CASES IN THIS JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`The following related cases are pending in this Judicial District:
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al, No. 21-cv-665-ADA
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., No. 21-cv-668-ADA
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 21-cv-670-ADA
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. AT&T Corp. et al., No. 21-cv-671-ADA
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al., No. 21-cv-672-ADA
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al., No. 21-cv-674-ADA
`
`The following set of related cases involving the parties are also pending in this Judicial District.
`
`VoIP-Pal, however, disputes that these cases are related to the instant case.
`
`●
`
`●
`
`●
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al., No. 6:20-cv-00267-ADA
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 6:20-cv-00269-ADA
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., No. 6:20-cv-00272-ADA
`
`IPR, CBM, AND OTHER PGR FILINGS
`
`There are no known inter partes review (IPR), covered business method review (CBM), or
`
`other post grant review (PGR) filings concerning the patents-in-suit at this time.
`
`NUMBER OF ASSERTED PATENTS AND CLAIMS
`
`In its Complaint, VoIP-Pal asserts two (2) patents and a total of two (2) patent claims.
`
`VoIP-Pal reserves the right to assert additional or different patent claims in its Preliminary
`
`Infringement Contentions.
`
`APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL ADVISOR
`
` The parties do not believe a technical advisor will be necessary for this case.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 19 Filed 09/14/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
` MEET AND CONFER STATUS
`
`VoIP-Pal and Google met and conferred telephonically on September 14, 2021.
`
`Google intends to move to transfer this case to the Northern District of California pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C. § 1404.
`
` Dated: September 14 , 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas
`nick@gikkaslaw.com
`Hudnell Law Group P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`T: 650.564.3698
`F: 347.772.3034
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VOIP-
`PAL.COM, INC.
`
`
`/s/Robert W. Unikel (with permission)
`Paige Arnette Amstutz
`State Bar No.: 00796136
`pamstutz@scottdoug.com
`SCOTT, DOUGLASS & MCCONNICO,
`LLP
`303 Colorado Street, Suite 2400
`Austin, TX 78701
`Telephone: (512) 495-6300
`Facsimile: (512) 495-6399
`
`Robert W. Unikel (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`robertunikel@paulhastings.com
`Matthew Lind (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`matthewlind@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`71 South Wacker Drive, 45th Floor
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 499-6000
`Facsimile: (312) 499-6100
`
`Robert R. Laurenzi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: (212) 318-6000
`Facsimile: (212) 319-4090
`
`Ariell N. Bratton (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`ariellbratton@paulhastings.com
`Cole D. Malmberg (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`colemalmberg@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`4747 Executive Drive, 12th Floor
`San Diego, CA 92121
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 19 Filed 09/14/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`Telephone: (858) 458-3000
`Facsimile: (858) 458-3005
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`GOOGLE LLC
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 19 Filed 09/14/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to
`
`electronic service are being served with a copy of the forgoing CASE READINESS STATUS
`
`REPORT via the Court’s CM/ECF system pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
`
`Local Rule CV-5(b)(1) this 14th day of September, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Hudnell Law Group P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`T: 650.564.3698
`F: 347.772.3034
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket