Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 60
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00916
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`RFCyber CORP.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`APPLE, INC.
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, RFCyber Corp. (“RFCyber” or “Plaintiff”), files this original Complaint against
`
`Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple” or “Defendant”), for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271
`
`and alleges as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`RFCyber is a Texas corporation with a place of business at 600 Columbus
`
`Avenue, Suite 106, Waco, Texas 76701. RFCyber is the owner of all right, title, and interest in
`
`and to, or is the exclusive licensee with the right to sue for U.S. Patent Nos. 8,118,218,
`
`9,189,787, 9,240,009, 10,600,046, and 11,018,724 (the “Patents-in-Suit” or “Asserted Patents”).
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Apple, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`
`California, with one or more regular and established places of business in this District at least at
`
`12545 Riata Vista Circle, Austin, Texas 78727; 12801 Delcour Drive, Austin, Texas 78727;
`
`6800 W Parmer Lane, Austin, Texas 78729, and 3121 Palm Way, Austin, Texas 78758. Apple
`
`may be served with process through its registered agent, the CT Corp System, at 1999 Bryan St.,
`
`Ste. 900 Dallas, Texas 75201-3136. In November 2019, Apple stated that it had approximately
`
`7,000 employees in Austin and that it expected to open, in 2022, a $1 billion, 3 million-square-
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 60
`
`foot campus with capacity for 15,000 employees. See
`
`https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/11/apple-expands-in-austin/. Apple is registered to do
`
`business in the State of Texas and has been since at least May 16, 1980.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332, 1338, and 1367.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
`
`This Court has specific and personal jurisdiction over Defendant consistent with
`
`the requirements of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution and the Texas Long
`
`Arm Statute. Upon information and belief, Defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the
`
`forum because Defendant has physical locations and transacts substantial business in the State of
`
`Texas and in this Judicial District. Further, Defendant has, directly or through subsidiaries or
`
`intermediaries, committed and continues to commit acts of patent infringement in the State of
`
`Texas and in this Judicial District as alleged in this Complaint, as alleged more particularly
`
`below.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1400(b) and
`
`1391(b) and (c) because Defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in this Judicial District, has
`
`committed acts of patent infringement in this Judicial District, and has a regular and established
`
`place of business in this Judicial District. Defendant, through its own acts, makes, uses, sells,
`
`and/or offers to sell infringing products within this Judicial District, regularly does and solicits
`
`business in this Judicial District, and has the requisite minimum contacts with the Judicial
`
`District such that this venue is a fair and reasonable one.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 3 of 60
`
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`7.
`
`On February 21, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,118,218 (the “’218 Patent”) entitled “Method and Apparatus for
`
`Providing Electronic Purse.” A true and correct copy of the ’218 Patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`8.
`
`On November 17, 2015, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 9,189,787 (the “’787 Patent”) entitled “Method and Apparatus for
`
`Conducting E-Commerce and M-Commerce.” A true and correct copy of the ’787 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit B.
`
`9.
`
`On January 19, 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 9,240,009 (the “’009 Patent”) entitled “Mobile Devices for
`
`Commerce Over Unsecured Networks.” A true and correct copy of the ’009 Patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit C.
`
`10.
`
`On January March 24, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly
`
`and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 10,600,046 (the “’046 Patent”) entitled “Method and
`
`Apparatus for Mobile Payments.” A true and correct copy of the ’046 Patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit D.
`
`11.
`
`On May 25, 2021, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 11,018,724 (the “’724 Patent”) entitled “Method and Apparatus for
`
`Emulating Multiple Cards in Mobile Devices.” A true and correct copy of the ’724 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit E
`
`12.
`
`RFCyber is the sole and exclusive owner of all right, title and interest to and in, or
`
`is the exclusive licensee with the right to sue for, the ’218, ‘787, ‘009, ‘046, and ‘724 Patents
`
`(together, the “Patents-in-Suit”), and holds the exclusive right to take all actions necessary to
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 4 of 60
`
`enforce its rights to the Patents-in-Suit, including the filing of this patent infringement lawsuit.
`
`RFCyber also has the right to recover all damages for past, present, and future infringement of
`
`the Patents-in-Suit and to seek injunctive relief as appropriate under the law.
`
`INFRINGEMENT ALLEGATIONS
`
`13.
`
`The technologies of the Patents-in-Suit were variously invented by Liang Seng
`
`Koh, Hsin Pan, Xiangzhen Xie, Futong Cho, and Fuliang Cho. The Patents-in-Suit generally
`
`cover apparatus and methods for enabling secure contactless payment with a portable device. In
`
`one exemplary embodiment, a smart card module including a secure element may emulate a
`
`payment card over near field communications (“NFC”). For example, users may select one of a
`
`plurality of payment cards stored in a memory of the secure element, and carry out a transaction
`
`via NFC at a point of service (“POS”). In another embodiment, the device may securely conduct
`
`transactions over an open network with a payment server. By facilitating the settlement of
`
`charges using an NFC mobile device to read off data pertaining to an electronic invoice, the
`
`inventions of the Patents-in-Suit provide significant time-savings, particularly in situations where
`
`a payment process would otherwise involve more than one contact between a merchant and
`
`consumer.
`
`14.
`
`Apple has manufactured, used, marketed, distributed, sold, offered for sale, and
`
`exported from and imported into the United States devices and software that infringe the Patents-
`
`in-Suit. Apple has distributed variants of Apple Pay that have included functionality to emulate a
`
`payment card and settle a transaction via NFC and/or MST at least since October 2014.1 Apple
`
`Pay is operable on a range of Apple devices, including at least all devices from the iPhone 6,
`
`iPhone 6 Plus, and above, including, at least all variants of the following Apple devices: iPhone
`
`
`1 See https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2014/09/09Apple-Announces-Apple-Pay/
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 5 of 60
`
`6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone SE, iPhone 7, iPhone 7Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone X, iPhone
`
`11, iPhone 12, iPad Pro, iPad Air, iPad, and iPad mini models with Touch ID or Face ID, Apple
`
`Watch Series 1 and later, Mac models with Touch ID, Mac computers with Apple Silicon that
`
`are paired with a Magic Keyboard with Touch ID, and all Apple devices released since October
`
`2014.2 The current and previous versions of Apple Pay and devices running Apple Pay, alone
`
`and together, are non-limiting instances of the Accused Products. The Accused Products include,
`
`for example, the representative iPhone X running Apple Pay. The Accused Products practice the
`
`claims of the Patents-in-Suit to improve the shopping experience of their users, and to improve
`
`Apple’s position in the market.
`
`15.
`
`Apple’s infringement of the Patents-in-Suit is willful. Apple continues to commit
`
`acts of infringement despite a high likelihood that its actions constitute infringement, and Apple
`
`knew or should have known that its actions constituted an unjustifiably high risk of infringement.
`
`16.
`
`RFCyber has at all times complied with the marking provisions of 35 U.S.C. §
`
`287 with respect to the Patents-in-Suit. On information and belief, any prior assignees and
`
`licensees have also complied with the marking provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 287.
`
`COUNT I
`(Infringement of the ’218 Patent)
`
`17.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 16 are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth
`
`in their entireties.
`
`18.
`
`RFCyber has not licensed or otherwise authorized Apple to make, use, offer for
`
`sale, sell, or import any products that embody the inventions of the ’218 Patent.
`
`19.
`
`Apple infringes, contributes to the infringement of, and/or induces infringement
`
`of the ’218 Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, distributing, exporting from,
`
`2 https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208531
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 6 of 60
`
`and/or importing into the United States products and/or methods covered by one or more claims
`
`of the ’218 Patent, including, but not limited to, at least the Accused Products.
`
`20.
`
`Apple has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the ’218 Patent,
`
`either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, without authority and in violation of 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271, by making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`products that satisfy each and every limitation of one or more claims of the ’218 Patent. Upon
`
`information and belief, these products include the Accused Products that practice the methods
`
`and systems covered by the ’218 Patent, including, for example, card emulation and NFC
`
`payment functionality implemented by Apple Pay running on an Apple device, such as the
`
`representative iPhone X. For example, these products infringe at least claim 1 of the ’218 Patent.
`
`21.
`
`For example, Apple has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 1 of the
`
`‘218 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`products that implement a method for providing an e-purse, the method comprising: providing a
`
`portable device including or communicating with a smart card pre-loaded with an emulator
`
`configured to execute a request from an e-purse applet and provide a response the e-purse applet
`
`is configured to expect, the portable device including a memory space loaded with a midlet that
`
`is configured to facilitate communication between the e-purse applet and a payment server over a
`
`wireless network, wherein the e-purse applet is downloaded and installed in the smart card when
`
`the smart card is in communication with the payment server, the portable device further includes
`
`a contactless interface that facilitates communication between the e-purse applet in the smart
`
`card and the payment server over a wired network; personalizing the e-purse applet by reading
`
`off data from the smart card to generate in the smart card one or more operation keys that are
`
`subsequently used to establish a secured channel between the e-purse applet and an e-purse
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 7 of 60
`
`security authentication module (SAM) external to the smart card, wherein said personalizing the
`
`e-purse applet comprises: establishing an initial security channel between the smart card and the
`
`e-purse SAM to install and personalize the e-purse applet in the smart card, and creating a
`
`security channel on top of the initial security channel to protect subsequent operations of the
`
`smart card with the e-purse SAM, wherein any subsequent operation of the emulator is
`
`conducted over the security channel via the e-purse applet.
`
`22.
`
`The Accused Products provide a portable device, such as the Apple iPhone X,
`
`including or communicating with a smart card pre-loaded with an emulator configured to execute
`
`a request from an e-purse applet and provide a response the e-purse applet is configured to
`
`expect. For example, the iPhone X includes or communicates with a smart card such as an NFC
`
`module, and/or assembly of an NFC module, secure element, processor, microcontroller, and/or
`
`memory, such as an NXP 80V18 PN80V NFC Controller. On information and belief, the smart
`
`card (e.g. NFC module) of the iPhone X is pre-loaded with an emulator configured to execute a
`
`request from an e-purse applet, such as a payment card applet within Apple Pay, and provide a
`
`response that the applet is configured to expect.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 8 of 60
`
`
`
`
`
`23.
`
`For example, Accused Products, such as the iPhone X, include a memory space
`
`loaded with a midlet, such as Apple Wallet or other software, that is configured to facilitate
`
`communication between the e-purse applet, such as a payment card stored on the product, and a
`
`payment server, such as a merchant and/or financial institution payment server, over a wireless
`
`network. For example, on information and belief, the Apple iPhone X comprises memory such as
`
`RAM, ROM, Flash, and/or EEPROM, including in both the NFC module and secure element.
`
`For example, on information and belief, the secure element of the Apple iPhone X running Apple
`
`Pay further comprises a memory such as RAM, ROM, Flash, and/or EEPROM.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 9 of 60
`
`
`
`
`
`https://support.apple.com/guide/security/apple-pay-component-security-sec2561eb018/1/web/1
`
`https://support.apple.com/guide/security/secure-element-and-nfc-controller-seccb53a35f0/web
`
`24.
`
`The Accused Products further perform a method wherein the e-purse applet is
`
`downloaded and installed in the smart card when the smart card is in communication with the
`
`payment server. For example, the Apple iPhone X running Apple Pay operates to download and
`
`install a payment card applet when the NFC module is in communication with the payment
`
`institution’s server:
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 10 of 60
`
`https://support.apple.com/guide/security/secure-element-and-nfc-controller-
`seccb53a35f0/web
`
`https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204506
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 11 of 60
`
`
`
`https://codeburst.io/how-does-apple-pay-actually-work-f52f7d9348b7
`
`25.
`
`The Accused Products further include a contactless interface that facilitates
`
`communication between the e-purse applet in the smart card and the payment server over a wired
`
`network. For example, on information and belief, the NFC module of the Apple iPhone X
`
`includes a contactless NFC interface that facilitates communication between a payment card
`
`applet and a payment server over a wired network, such as via a payment card reader at a POS
`
`connected to a payment server via wired network3:
`
`
`3 https://developer.apple.com/documentation/apple_pay_on_the_web/setting_up_your_server
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 12 of 60
`
`
`
`https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+X+Teardown/98975
`
`26.
`
`The Accused Products further personalize the e-purse applet (e.g. payment card
`
`applet within Apple Pay) by reading off data from the smart card (e.g. NFC Module or secure
`
`element) to generate in the smart card one or more operation keys that are subsequently used to
`
`establish a secured channel between the e-purse applet and an e-purse security authentication
`
`module (SAM) external to the smart card. For example, on information and belief, Apple Pay
`
`establishes operations keys that operate to establish secure connections between a stored
`
`payment card and an authentication module at a server of the card issuer and/or merchant when
`
`adding a given card to the device for the first time, and/or subsequently during transactions:
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 13 of 60
`
`https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203027
`
`27.
`
`The Accused Products further practice a method wherein personalizing the e-
`
`purse applet (e.g. configuring the payment card applet within Apple Pay) comprises establishing
`
`an initial security channel between the smart card and the e-purse SAM to install and personalize
`
`the e-purse applet in the smart card. For example, on information and belief, Apple Pay operates
`
`to establish a security channel with at least an Apple server after a user enters details for a given
`
`payment card, and operates to install and personalize the applet in the smart card, such as to
`
`install the card with the user’s personal information in the secure element:
`
`
`
`https://support.apple.com/guide/security/secure-element-and-nfc-controller-seccb53a35f0/web
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 14 of 60
`
`
`
`https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203027
`
`28.
`
`The Accused Products create a security channel on top of the initial security
`
`channel to protect subsequent operations of the smart card within the e-purse SAM, wherein any
`
`subsequent operation of the emulator is conducted over the security channel via the e-purse
`
`applet. For example, on information and belief, once a payment card applet is installed, operation
`
`of the emulator is conducted via operation of the e-purse applet using the security key installed
`
`during the personalization process.
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 15 of 60
`
`https://support.apple.com/guide/security/secure-element-and-nfc-controller-seccb53a35f0/web
`
`
`
`
`
`https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203027
`
`29.
`
`Apple has had knowledge and notice of the ‘218 Patent at least as of the filing of
`
`the complaint.
`
`30.
`
`Apple has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’218 Patent, as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by inducing infringement by
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 16 of 60
`
`others, such as Apple’s customers and end-users, in this District and elsewhere in the United
`
`States. For example, Apple’s customers and end-users directly infringe, either literally or under
`
`the doctrine of equivalents, through their use of the inventions claimed in the ’218 Patent. Apple
`
`induces this direct infringement through its affirmative acts of manufacturing, selling,
`
`distributing, and/or otherwise making available the Accused Products, and providing
`
`instructions, documentation, and other information to customers and end-users suggesting that
`
`they use the Accused Products in an infringing manner, including technical support, marketing,
`
`product manuals, advertisements, and online documentation. Because of Apple’s inducement,
`
`Apple’s customers and end-users use Accused Products in a way Apple intends and directly
`
`infringe the ’218 Patent. Apple performs these affirmative acts with knowledge of the ’218
`
`Patent and with the intent, or willful blindness, that the induced acts directly infringe the ’218
`
`Patent.
`
`31.
`
`Apple has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’218 Patent, as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), by contributing to direct
`
`infringement by others, such as customers and end-users, in this District and elsewhere in the
`
`United States. Apple’s affirmative acts of selling and offering to sell the Accused Products in
`
`this District and elsewhere in the United States and causing the Accused Products to be
`
`manufactured, used, sold and offered for sale contributes to others’ use and manufacture of the
`
`Accused Products such that the ’218 Patent is directly infringed by others. The accused
`
`components within the Accused Products are material to the invention of the ’218 Patent, are not
`
`staple articles or commodities of commerce, have no substantial non-infringing uses, and are
`
`known by Apple to be especially made or adapted for use in the infringement of the ’218 Patent.
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 17 of 60
`
`Apple performs these affirmative acts with knowledge of the ’218 Patent and with intent, or
`
`willful blindness, that they cause the direct infringement of the ’218 Patent.
`
`32.
`
`Because of Apple’s direct and indirect infringement of the ’218 Patent, RFCyber
`
`has suffered, and will continue to suffer, damages in an amount to be proved at trial.
`
`33.
`
`Because of Apple’s direct and indirect infringement of the ’218 Patent, RFCyber
`
`has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy
`
`at law, unless Apple’s infringement is enjoined by this Court.
`
`COUNT II
`(Infringement of the ’787 Patent)
`
`34.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 16 are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth
`
`in their entireties.
`
`35.
`
`RFCyber has not licensed or otherwise authorized Apple to make, use, offer for
`
`sale, sell, or import any products that embody the inventions of the ’787 Patent.
`
`36.
`
`Apple infringes, contributes to the infringement of, and/or induces infringement
`
`of the ’787 Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, distributing, exporting from,
`
`and/or importing into the United States products and/or methods covered by one or more claims
`
`of the ’787 Patent, including, but not limited to, at least the Accused Products.
`
`37.
`
`Apple has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the ’787 Patent,
`
`either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, without authority and in violation of 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271, by making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`products that satisfy each and every limitation of one or more claims of the ’787 Patent. Upon
`
`information and belief, these products include the Accused Products that practice the methods
`
`and systems covered by the ’787 Patent, including, for example, card emulation and NFC
`
`payment functionality implemented by Apple Pay running on an Apple device, such as the
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 18 of 60
`
`representative Apple iPhone X. For example, these products infringe at least claim 1 of the ’787
`
`Patent.
`
`38.
`
`For example, Apple has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 1 of the
`
`‘787 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`products that comprise a portable device for commerce, the portable device comprising an
`
`emulator loaded in a smart card module for storing security values and updated transaction logs,
`
`and an e-purse applet to cause the portable device to function as an electronic purse (e-purse),
`
`wherein both of the emulator and e-purse applet are already personalized via a personalization
`
`process built on a first security channel so that the emulator is set to store a set of keys for
`
`subsequent data access authentication and the e-purse applet is configured to conduct a
`
`transaction with a network server over a second security channel; a first interface configured to
`
`perform field communication (NFC) with a reader to perform electronic commerce with the e-
`
`purse applet against a fund stored in the emulator; a second interface configured to perform
`
`mobile commerce with a payment server via an application against the fund stored in the
`
`emulator; and a purse manager midlet being executed in the portable device to act as an agent to
`
`facilitate communications between the e-purse applet and a payment server to conduct
`
`transactions therebetween.
`
`39.
`
`The Accused Products comprise an emulator loaded in a smart card module for
`
`storing security values and updated transaction logs. For example, the Apple iPhone X comprises
`
`an NFC Module and secure element with an emulator for storing security values, such as device
`
`account number, operating keys and/or a tokenized card and cryptogram, and for updating
`
`transaction logs, such as via Apple Pay:
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 19 of 60
`
`https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+X+Teardown/98975
`
`https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203027
`
`19
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 20 of 60
`
`https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/manage-cards-and-activity-iph7b666943a/ios
`
`
`
`40.
`
`The accused products further comprise an e-purse applet, such as a payment card
`
`applet within Apple Pay, to cause the portable device (e.g. the Apple iPhone X) to function as an
`
`electronic purse. For example, applets within Apple Pay cause IOS devices to carry out a
`
`transaction, such as via NFC:
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 21 of 60
`
`https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203027
`
`41.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a portable device wherein both of the
`
`emulator (e.g. emulator of the NFC module) and e-purse applet (e.g. payment card applet) are
`
`already personalized via a personalization process built on a first security channel so that the
`
`emulator is set to store a set of keys for subsequent data access authentication and the e-purse
`
`applet is configured to conduct a transaction with a network server over a second security
`
`channel. For example, on information and belief, the emulator and applet of a iPhone X running
`
`Apple Pay are personalized during installation so that the emulator stores a set of keys (e.g.
`
`device account number, operating keys and/or a tokenized card and cryptogram) for subsequent
`
`access and authentication during transactions.
`
`https://support.apple.com/guide/security/secure-element-and-nfc-controller-seccb53a35f0/web
`
`
`
`
`
`21
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 22 of 60
`
`
`
`https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203027
`
`42.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a first interface configured to perform
`
`field communication (NFC) with a reader to perform electronic commerce with the e-purse
`
`applet against a fund stored in the emulator. For example, the Apple iPhone X comprises an NFC
`
`Module, such as an NXP 80V18 PN80V NFC Controller, including an NFC interface to perform
`
`electronic commerce with a card reader.
`
`22
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 23 of 60
`
`
`
`https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+X+Teardown/98975
`
`43.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a second interface configured to perform
`
`mobile commerce with a payment server via an application against the fund stored in the
`
`emulator. For example, on information and belief, the Apple iPhone X comprises a second
`
`interface to perform mobile commerce with a payment server, such as the payment server of an
`
`issuer and/or a merchant, against a fund stored in the emulator, such as a gift card fund stored in
`
`the emulator of an NFC module via the payment servers of Apple Pay-enabled applications.
`
`23
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 24 of 60
`
`
`
`https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203027
`
`44.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a purse manager midlet, such as Apple
`
`Wallet or other software, being executed in the portable device to act as an agent to facilitate
`
`communications between the e-purse applet and a payment server to conduct transactions
`
`therebetween. For example, on information and belief, the Apple iPhone X executes Apple
`
`Wallet to facilitate communications between payment cards (e.g. cards within an emulator and/or
`
`secure element of an NFC module) and a payment server (e.g. an issuer and/or merchant
`
`payment server) during transactions conducted via NFC and/or via Apple Pay-enabled
`
`application.
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 25 of 60
`
`https://support.apple.com/guide/security/apple-pay-component-security-sec2561eb018/1/web/1
`
`45.
`
`Apple has had knowledge and notice of the ‘787 Patent at least as of the filing of
`
`
`
`the complaint.
`
`46.
`
`Apple has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ‘787 Patent, as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by inducing infringement by
`
`others, such as Apple’s customers and end-users, in this District and elsewhere in the United
`
`States. For example, Apple’s customers and end-users directly infringe, either literally or under
`
`the doctrine of equivalents, through their use of the inventions claimed in the ‘787 Patent. Apple
`
`induces this direct infringement through its affirmative acts of manufacturing, selling,
`
`distributing, and/or otherwise making available the Accused Products, and providing
`
`instructions, documentation, and other information to customers and end-users suggesting that
`
`they use the Accused Products in an infringing manner, including technical support, marketing,
`
`product manuals, advertisements, and online documentation. Because of Apple’s inducement,
`
`Apple’s customers and end-users use Accused Products in a way Apple intends and directly
`
`infringe the ‘787 Patent. Apple performs these affirmative acts with knowledge of the ‘787
`
`25
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 26 of 60
`
`Patent and with the intent, or willful blindness, that the induced acts directly infringe the ‘787
`
`Patent.
`
`47.
`
`Apple has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ‘787 Patent, as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), by contributing to direct
`
`infringement by others, such as customers and end-users, in this District and elsewhere in the
`
`United States. Apple’s affirmative acts of selling and offering to sell the Accused Products in
`
`this District and elsewhere in the United States and causing the Accused Products to be
`
`manufactured, used, sold and offered for sale contributes to others’ use and manufacture of the
`
`Accused Products such that the ‘787 Patent is directly infringed by others. The accused
`
`components within the Accused Products are material to the invention of the ‘787 Patent, are not
`
`staple articles or commodities of commerce, have no substantial non-infringing uses, and are
`
`known by Apple to be especially made or adapted for use in the infringement of the ‘787 Patent.
`
`Apple performs these affirmative acts with knowledge of the ‘787 Patent and with intent, or
`
`willful blindness, that they cause the direct infringement of the ‘787 Patent.
`
`48.
`
`Because of Apple’s direct and indirect infringement of the ’218 Patent, RFCyber
`
`has suffered, and will continue to suffer, damages in an amount to be proved at trial.
`
`49.
`
`Because of Apple’s direct and indirect infringement of the ’218 Patent, RFCyber
`
`has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy
`
`at law, unless Apple’s infringement is enjoined by this Court.
`
`COUNT III
`(Infringement of the ’009 Patent)
`
`50.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 16 are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth
`
`in their entireties.
`
`26
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 27 of 60
`
`51.
`
`RFCyber has not licensed or otherwise authorized Apple to make, use, offer for
`
`sale, sell, or import any products that embody the inventions of the ’009 Patent.
`
`52.
`
`Apple infringes, contributes to the infringement of, and/or induces infringement
`
`of the ’009 Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, distributing, exporting from,
`
`and/or importing into the United States products and/or methods covered by one or more claims
`
`of the ’009 Patent, including, but not limited to, at least the Accused Products.
`
`53.
`
`Apple has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the ’009 Patent,
`
`either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, without authority and in violation of 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271, by making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing into the United States
`
`products that satisfy each and every limitation of one or more claims of the ’009 Patent. Upon
`
`information and belief, these products include the Accused Products that practice the methods
`
`and systems covered by the ’009 Patent, incl