`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`IOENGINE, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`ROKU, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 6:21-cv-1296-ADA-DTG
`
`
`
`
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`ORDER REGARDING ASSERTED CLAIMS AND
`PRIOR ART REFERENCES AND COMBINATIONS
`
`
`
`On August 10, 2023, the Parties jointly informed the Court of a dispute regarding the
`
`narrowing of asserted claims and prior art references to triable limits.1 On August 17, 2023, the
`
`Court held a Discovery Hearing and issued oral rulings on the dispute.
`
`The Court GRANTS-IN-PART IOENGINE, LLC’s (“IOENGINE”) proposed narrowing,
`
`for Roku, Inc. (“Roku”) to provide, by no later than Wednesday, August 23, 2023, a narrowed
`
`disclosure of no more than ten (10) prior art references in total and an identification of no more
`
`than two (2) prior art combinations per Asserted Claim that Roku may rely on at trial for its
`
`invalidity case.2 Whether Roku may amend or alter its identification of the two prior art
`
`1 See Dkt. 182.
`
`
`
`2 Pursuant to the Court’s August 17 oral Order, on August 18, 2023, IOENGINE disclosed the
`twelve claims that it may rely on at trial for its infringement case (IOENGINE’s “Asserted
`Claims”).
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-01296-ADA-DTG Document 282 Filed 08/22/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`combinations per Asserted Claim, should such issue arise, will be addressed by the Court after
`
`ruling on all currently pending motions addressing prior art references.3
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 22, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEREK T. GILLILAND
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`3 Dkt. Nos. 164, 193, 194, 195, 197
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
