`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`JURY TRIAL
`
`C.A. NO. 6:22-cv-00031-ADA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`FLYPSI, INC. (D/B/A FLYP),
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`vs.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF FLYPSI, INC.’S OPPOSED
`MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT OR TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S
`INEQUITABLE CONDUCT DEFENSE
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion to Strike Defendant’s Answer to Second
`
`Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement or to Dismiss Defendant’s Inequitable Conduct
`
`Defense. After reviewing the relevant briefing and evidence filed by the parties, the Court finds
`
`that the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Google's amended answer is stricken, and its
`
`affirmative defense of inequitable conduct is dismissed.
`
`
`
`SIGNED on this ________ day of _________________, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`