`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`FLYPSI, INC. (D/B/A FLYP),
`
` Civil Action No. 6:22-cv-00031-ADA
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` vs.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
` Defendant.
`
` JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
` FILED UNDER SEAL
`
`ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION REGARDING THE PARTIES’
`AGREED MOTIONS IN LIMINE
`
`Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion Regarding the Parties’ Agreed Motions in
`
`Limine. After considering the Motion, the Court hereby rules that:
`
`Flyp’s Motion in Limine No. 2 is GRANTED and mutually applicable to both parties, and
`
`that no party, its counsel, nor any witnesses shall introduce, rely upon, or make reference to a lay
`
`person’s understanding of any claim term. If a lay witness uses a claim term in their testimony,
`
`they may not apply their understanding of any claim term to the claims or testify as to how a person
`
`of ordinary skill in the art may understand that claim term.
`
`Flyp’s Motion in Limine No. 6 is GRANTED and mutually applicable to both parties, and
`
`that no party, its counsel, nor any witnesses shall introduce, rely upon, or make reference to any
`
`patents, patent applications (including any pending applications by Flyp), claims, defenses, or prior
`
`art no longer asserted or at issue in this case. Either party may approach the bench if any issue
`
`regarding this arises.
`
`Flyp’s Motion in Limine No. 9 is GRANTED and mutually applicable to both parties, and
`
`that no party, its counsel, nor any witnesses shall introduce, rely upon, or make reference regarding
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 259 Filed 01/30/24 Page 2 of 2
`
`any untoward or illegal use of secondary number services or that either party intended its product
`
`to be used for such purposes.
`
`Google’s Motion in Limine No. 2 is GRANTED and mutually applicable to both parties,
`
`and that no lay witnesses shall introduce, rely upon, or make reference to whether any version of
`
`Google Voice does or does not practice the alleged invention or any specific claim limitation.
`
`Pursuant to this Court’s Standing Order in Limine No. 18, no party, its counsel, nor any
`
`witness shall argue or elicit testimony to the effect that Flyp’s commercial product limits the
`
`asserted claims.
`
`Further, pursuant to this Court’s Orders in Limine No. 13, the parties shall be precluded
`
`from introducing argument, evidence, or testimony related to other proceedings, including without
`
`limitation foreign and domestic governmental investigations and related penalties, unless for
`
`purposes of impeachment or untruthfulness under Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b). The parties
`
`may approach the bench and seek modification of this order as necessary.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:45)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:17)
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
